Advertisement

Food challenges

  • Barbara K. Ballmer-Weber
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Barbara K. Ballmer-Weber, MD, Chefärztin Allergologie, Zentrum für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital Luzern, 6016 Luzern, Switzerland.
    Affiliations
    Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

    Center of Dermatology and Allergology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kirsten Beyer
    Affiliations
    Department of Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
      Discuss this article on the JACI Journal Club blog: www.jaci-online.blogspot.com.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Sampson H.A.
        • Gerth van Wijk R.
        • Bindslev-Jensen C.
        • Sicherer S.
        • Teuber S.S.
        • Burks A.W.
        • et al.
        Standardizing double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130: 1260-1274
        • Blumchen K.
        • Beder A.
        • Beschorner J.
        • Ahrens F.
        • Gruebl A.
        • Hamelmann E.
        • et al.
        Modified oral food challenge used with sensitization biomarkers provides more real-life clinical thresholds for peanut allergy.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 134: 390-398
        • Ballmer-Weber B.K.
        • Fernandez-Rivas M.
        • Beyer K.
        • Defernez M.
        • Sperrin M.
        • Mackie A.R.
        • et al.
        How much is too much? Threshold dose distributions for 5 food allergens.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015; 135: 964-971
        • Grabenhenrich L.B.
        • Reich A.
        • Bellach J.
        • Trendelenburg V.
        • Sprikkelman A.B.
        • Roberts G.
        • et al.
        A new framework for the documentation and interpretation of oral food challenges in population-based and clinical research.
        Allergy. 2017; 72: 453-461
        • Ballmer-Weber B.K.
        • Holzhauser T.
        • Scibilia J.
        • Mittag D.
        • Zisa G.
        • Ortolani C.
        • et al.
        Clinical characteristics of soybean allergy in Europe: a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge study.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 119: 1489-1496
        • Mackie A.
        • Knulst A.
        • Le T.M.
        • Bures P.
        • Salt L.
        • Mills E.N.
        • et al.
        High fat food increases gastric residence and thus thresholds for objective symptoms in allergic patients.
        Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012; 56: 1708-1714
        • Osborne N.J.
        • Koplin J.J.
        • Martin P.E.
        • Gurrin L.C.
        • Lowe A.J.
        • Matheson M.C.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of challenge-proven IgE-mediated food allergy using population-based sampling and predetermined challenge criteria in infants.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 127: 668-676
        • Ahrens B.
        • Niggemann B.
        • Wahn U.
        • Beyer K.
        Positive reactions to placebo in children undergoing double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge.
        Clin Exp Allergy. 2014; 44: 572-578

      Linked Article

      • Additional oral food challenge considerations
        Journal of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyVol. 141Issue 6
        • Preview
          We read with great interest the excellent review article by Ballmer-Weber and Beyer entitled “Food challenges.”1 We recognize that a brief “Methods of allergy and immunology” review cannot provide a comprehensive manual of operations for complex procedures, such as a diagnostic oral food challenge (OFC). We commend the authors for including a host of detail in this brief report. However, we are concerned that the necessary brevity of the review may have resulted in a focus on characteristics of high risk and research–based OFCs, resulting in comments and suggestions that may dissuade office-based practitioners from undertaking the procedure.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF