Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with fresh foods and commercial food extracts) and RAST in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      One hundred adult patients with a history of oral allergy syndrome (OAS) after ingestion of fruits and vegetables, 77 patients with hay fever and 13 with skin prick tests and RAST positive to pollens but without seasonal symptoms, and 32 normal nonallergic control subjects, had Phadebas RAST and skin prick tests with commercial extracts (CSPT) and with fresh foods (FFSPT) to assess the reliability of these three tests. Sensitivity was better with FFSPT for carrot, celery, cherry, apple, tomato, orange, and peach; better with CSPT for peanut, pea, and walnut; and better with RAST for hazelnut. Specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the three tests were determined for apple, carrot, hazelnut, orange, pea, peanut, and tomato. Specificity in the patient groups ranged between 40% (pea) and 100% (apple) for CSPT, between 61% (peanut) and 87% (carrot) for RAST, and between 42% (carrot) and 93% (peanut) for FFSPT. However, all tests were negative in the control group. Thus, false positive results may result from cross-reactivity with pollen allergens. The diagnostic accuracy of these tests in the population with OAS proved comparable for peanut, carrot, hazelnut, and pea. FFSPT proved more sensitive than CSPT or RAST in confirming a history of OAS to certain alimentary allergens, such as apple, orange, tomato, carrot, cherry, celery, and peach.


      OAS (Oral allergy syndrome), HS (Hollister-Stier Laboratories), SPT (Skin prick test), CSPT (Commercial extracts skin prick test), FFSPT (Fresh food skin prick test), SE (Sensitivity), SP (Specificity), PPV (Positive predictive value), NPV (Negative predictive value)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


        • Amlot PL
        • Kemeny DM
        • Zachary C
        • Parkes P
        • Lessof MH
        Oral allergy syndrome (OAS): symptoms of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to foods.
        Clin Allergy. 1987; 17: 33
        • Eriksson N
        • Formgreen H
        • Svenonius E
        Food hypersensitivity in patients with pollen allergy.
        Allergy. 1982; 37: 437
        • Dreborg S
        • Foucard T
        Allergy to apple, carrot, and potato in children with birch-pollen allergy.
        Allergy. 1983; 38: 167
        • Lowenstein H
        • Eriksson N
        Hypersensitivity to foods among birch pollen-allergic patients.
        Allergy. 1983; 38: 577
        • Hannuksela M
        • Lahti A
        Immediate reactions to vegetables.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1977; 3: 79
        • Lahti A
        • Bjorksten F
        • Hannuksela M
        Allergy to birch pollen and apple and cross-reactivity of the allergens studied with the RAST.
        Allergy. 1980; 35: 297
        • Andersen KE
        • Lowenstein H
        An investigation of the possible immunological relationship between allergen extracts from birch pollen, hazelnut, potato, and apple.
        Contact Dermatitis. 1970; 4: 73
        • Halmepuro L
        • Lowenstein H
        Immunological investigation of possible structural similarities between pollen antigens and antigens in apple, carrot, and celery tuber.
        Allergy. 1985; 40: 264
        • Pauli G
        • Bessot JC
        • Dieterann-Molard A
        • Braun PA
        • Tierry R
        Celery sensitivity: clinical and immunological correlation with pollen allergy.
        Clin Allergy. 1985; 15: 273
        • Anderson LB
        • Dreyfuss EM
        • Logan J
        • Johnstone DE
        • Glaser J
        Melon and banana sensitivity coincident with ragweed pollinosis.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1970; 45: 310
        • Bjorksten F
        • Halmepuro L
        • Hannuksela M
        • Lahti A
        Extraction and properties of apple allergens.
        Allergy. 1980; 35: 671
        • Aas K
        • Belin L
        Standardization of diagnostic work in allergy.
        Acta Allergol. 1972; 27: 439
        • Aas K
        Some variables in skin prick testing.
        Allergy. 1980; 35: 250
        • Fleiss TL
        Statistical methods for rates and proportions.
        in: John Wiley, New York1981: 212-225
        • Goldman L
        Quantitative aspects of clinical reasoning.
        in: Principles of internal medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York1987: 5-11
        • Bock SA
        • Lee WY
        • Remigio LK
        • May CD
        Studies of hypersensitivity reactions to foods in infants and children.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987; 62: 327
        • Sampson HA
        Role of immediate food hypersensitivity in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983; 71: 473
        • Bernstein M
        • Day JH
        • Welsh A
        Double-blind food challenge in the diagnosis of food sensitivity in the adult.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982; 70: 205
        • Atkins FM
        • Steinberg SS
        • Metcalfe DD
        Evaluation of immediate adverse reactions to foods in adult patients. I. Correlation of demographic, laboratory, and prick skin test data with response to controlled oral food challenge.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1985; 75: 348
        • Lessof MH
        • Wraith
        • Merrett TG
        • Merrett J
        • Buisseret PD
        Food allergy and intolerance in 100 patients—local and systemic effects.
        QJ Med. 1980; : 259-272
        • Sampson HA
        • Albergo R
        Comparison of results of skin tests, RAST, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis.
        J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984; 74: 26
        • Loomis WD
        • Battaile Y
        Plant phenolic compounds and the isolation of plant enzymes.
        Phytochem. 1966; 5: 423