« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 103, Issue 2
, Pages
227-231
, February 1999
Evaluation of materials used for bedding encasement: Effect of pore size in blocking cat and dust mite allergen
-
Diagrammatic representation of a modified Fussnecker dust trap showing placement of fabric, location of flow meter and pressure gauges, and direction of airflow.
Diagrammatic representation of a modified Fussnecker dust trap showing placement of fabric, location of flow meter and pressure gauges, and direction of airflow.
-
Scanning electron microscope pictures of 4 woven fabrics: laboratory control (A) , 50-μm fabric (B) , 10-μm fabric (C) , and 2-μm fabric (D) (see Table I for details).
Scanning electron microscope pictures of 4 woven fabrics: laboratory control (A) , 50-μm fabric (B) , 10-μm fabric (C) , and 2-μm fabric (D) (see Table I for details).
-
Allergen recovered from filter after testing fine woven fabrics with 1.0 g of dust containing 510 μg/g Fel d 1, 5.5 μg/g Der f 1, 3.7 μg/g Der p, 1 or 26.9 μg/g concentrated Der p 1. The amounts of al
Allergen recovered from filter after testing fine woven fabrics with 1.0 g of dust containing 510 μg/g Fel d 1, 5.5 μg/g Der f 1, 3.7 μg/g Der p, 1 or 26.9 μg/g concentrated Der p 1. The amounts of allergen recovered from the 6-μm and 2-μm fabrics reflect the lower limit of the assay. The control was a used cotton sheet (laboratory control).
☆ Supported by grants AI-20565 and AI-34607 from the National Institutes of Health and educational grants from Precision Fabrics Group and Allergy Control Products.
☆☆ Reprint requests: Thomas A. E. Platts-Mills, MD, PhD, UVA Asthma and Allergic Diseases Center, Box 225, Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
★ 0091-6749/99 $8.00 + 0 1/1/93920
PII: S0091-6749(99)70495-1
© 1999 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 103, Issue 2
, Pages
227-231
, February 1999
