The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 102, Issue 6 , Pages 927-934, December 1998

Effect of rush immunotherapy on airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness after bronchoprovocation with allergen in asthma☆☆

Tokyo and Kanagawa, Japan

Received 18 May 1998; received in revised form 17 July 1998; accepted 3 August 1998.

Abstract 

Background: Rush immunotherapy (RIT) has been shown to be effective in allergic asthma. Objective: We investigated the mechanisms of RIT on the basis of cytokine production by T-cell lines and airway inflammation and responsiveness. Methods: Subjects were 8 patients with house dust mite–allergic asthma treated with dust mite extract RIT for 6 months and 6 RIT-untreated control patients. IL-5 production by Dermatophagoides farinae –specific T-cell lines, eosinophil percentages, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in induced sputum and airway responsiveness to allergen and histamine were evaluated before and after treatment. Changes in eosinophil percentages and ECP in induced sputum and responsiveness to histamine 24 hours after allergen inhalation were also studied. Results: After 6 months of RIT, percentages of total eosinophils (43.0% ± 6.90% to 16.8% ± 2.48%; P < .01), percentages of EG2+ eosinophils (32.6% ± 6.39% to 19.7% ± 4.68%; P < .01) and ECP (362.7 ± 125.3 ng/mL to 26.2 ± 5.15 ng/mL; P < .05) decreased in induced sputum, and IL-5 production by T-cell lines decreased (617 ± 93.2 pg/mL to 200.0 ± 34.1 pg/mL; P < .01). RIT decreased both early- and late-phase bronchoconstriction (early phase: 33.2% ± 3.46% to 25.4% ± 1.42%; P < .03; late phase: 16.2% ± 3.52% to 6.2% ± 1.96%; P < .03) and suppressed increases in the percentages of total (61.8% ± 4.89% to 42.0% ± 4.67%; P < .01) and EG2-positive eosinophils (55.54% ± 7.21% to 36.5% ± 6.43%; P < .01) and ECP (685.6 ± 217.0 ng/mL to 85.4 ± 23.4 ng/mL; P < .05) in induced sputum after allergen inhalation. RIT also decreased airway responsiveness to dust mite (1:303.7 ± 123.7 wt/vol to 1:65.0 ± 13.2 wt/vol; P < .03) and to histamine before (397.1 ± 206.9 μg/mL to 1391.3 ± 283.3 μg/mL; P < .03) and after allergen inhalation (139.2 ± 36.5 μg/mL to 629.1 ± 196.3 μg/mL; P < .03). Conclusion: RIT decreases airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness before and after bronchial provocation with allergen, possibly by inhibiting both allergen-specific T-cell– and mast cell-dependent pathways. RIT is an effective antiinflammatory treatment in allergic asthma. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;102:927-34.)

Keywords:  Asthma, rush immunotherapy, T H2 cell, mast cell, IL-5, eosinophil, airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, late asthmatic response

Abbreviations:  DM: , Dust mite, EAR: , Early asthmatic response, ECP: , Eosinophil cationic protein, LAR: , Late asthmatic response, PEF: , Peak expiratory flow, RIT: , Rush immunotherapy, TH : , T helper

 

 From a the First Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo; and b the Department of Immunology and Medicine, St Mariannna University, Kanagawa.

☆☆ Reprint requests: Kenji Minoguchi, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University, School of Medicine, 1-5-8, Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142, Japan.

 0091-6749/98 $5.00 + 0  1/1/93729

PII: S0091-6749(98)70330-6

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 102, Issue 6 , Pages 927-934, December 1998