Volume 125, Issue 1 , Pages 191-197.e13, January 2010
Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: Prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics
Background
Not all peanut-sensitized children develop allergic reactions on exposure.
Objective
To establish by oral food challenge the proportion of children with clinical peanut allergy among those considered peanut-sensitized by using skin prick tests and/or IgE measurement, and to investigate whether component-resolved diagnostics using microarray could differentiate peanut allergy from tolerance.
Methods
Within a population-based birth cohort, we ascertained peanut sensitization by skin tests and IgE measurement at age 8 years. Among sensitized children, we determined peanut allergy versus tolerance by oral food challenges. We used open challenge among children consuming peanuts (n = 45); others underwent double-blind placebo-controlled challenge (n = 34). We compared sensitization profiles between children with peanut allergy and peanut-tolerant children by using a microarray with 12 pure components (major peanut and potentially cross-reactive components, including grass allergens).
Results
Of 933 children, 110 (11.8%) were peanut-sensitized. Nineteen were not challenged (17 no consent). Twelve with a convincing history of reactions on exposure, IgE ≥15 kUa/L and/or skin test ≥8mm were considered allergic without challenge. Of the remaining 79 children who underwent challenge, 7 had ≥2 objective signs and were designated as having peanut allergy. We estimated the prevalence of clinical peanut allergy among sensitized subjects as 22.4% (95% CI, 14.8% to 32.3%). By using component-resolved diagnostics, we detected marked differences in the pattern of component recognition between children with peanut allergy (n = 29; group enriched with 12 children with allergy) and peanut-tolerant children (n = 52). The peanut component Ara h 2 was the most important predictor of clinical allergy.
Conclusion
The majority of children considered peanut-sensitized on the basis of standard tests do not have peanut allergy. Component-resolved diagnostics may facilitate the diagnosis of peanut allergy.
Key words: Peanut allergy, oral food challenge, component-resolved diagnostics, Ara h 2, microarray, birth cohort
Abbreviations used: CRD, Component-resolved diagnostics, DBPCFC, Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, MWD, Mean wheal diameter, OFC, Oral food challenge, sIgE, Serum IgE, SPT, Skin prick test, UK, United Kingdom
Core clinical follow-up of the cohort was supported by Asthma UK grant no. 04/014 and the Moulton Charitable Trust and is currently supported by MRC grant G0601361. The peanut study within the cohort was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Jackie and Carl Michaelsen. Serum IgE and component-resolved diagnostics assays were funded by Phadia AB.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Poorafshar, A. Härlin, and H. Winell are employees of Phadia AB. S. Ahlstedt is a previous employee of Phadia AB. A. Simpson has received research support from the Medical Research Council, the Moulton Charitable Foundation, and the Grand Charity of Freemasons. A. Custovic has received lecture fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Phadia, is on the advisory board of ALK, and has received research support from the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(09)01534-6
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.008
© 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 125, Issue 1 , Pages 191-197.e13, January 2010
