Volume 124, Issue 6 , Pages 1267-1272, December 2009
Epinephrine treatment is infrequent and biphasic reactions are rare in food-induced reactions during oral food challenges in children
Background
Data about epinephrine use and biphasic reactions in childhood food-induced anaphylaxis during oral food challenges are scarce.
Objective
To determine the prevalence and risk factors of reactions requiring epinephrine and the rate of biphasic reactions during oral food challenges (OFCs) in children.
Methods
Reaction details of positive OFCs in children between 1999 and 2007 were collected by using a computerized database. Selection of patients for OFCs was generally predicated on ≤50% likelihood of a positive challenge and a low likelihood of a severe reaction on the basis of the clinical history, specific IgE levels, and skin prick tests.
Results
A total of 436 of 1273 OFCs resulted in a reaction (34%). Epinephrine was administered in 50 challenges (11% of positive challenges, 3.9% overall) for egg (n = 15, 16% of positive OFCs to egg), milk (n = 14, 12%), peanut (n = 10, 26%), tree nuts (n = 4, 33%), soy (n = 3, 7%), wheat (n = 3, 9%), and fish (n = 1, 9%). Reactions requiring epinephrine occurred in older children (median, 7.9 vs 5.8 years; P < .001) and were more often caused by peanuts (P = .006) compared with reactions not treated with epinephrine. There was no difference in the sex, prevalence of asthma, history of anaphylaxis, specific IgE level, skin prick tests, or amount of food administered. Two doses of epinephrine were required in 3 of 50 patients (6%) reacting to wheat, cow's milk, and pistachio. There was 1 (2%) biphasic reaction. No reaction resulted in life-threatening respiratory or cardiovascular compromise.
Conclusion
Older age and reactions to peanuts were risk factors for anaphylaxis during oral food challenges. Reactions requiring multiple doses of epinephrine and biphasic reactions were infrequent.
Key words: Food allergy, autoinjector, self-injectable, epinephrine, children, anaphylaxis, oral food challenge, food-induced anaphylaxis, peanut allergy, tree nut allergy, cow's milk allergy, milk allergy, egg allergy, allergic reaction
Abbreviations used: GCRC, General Clinical Research Center, OFC, Oral food challenge, SPT, Skin prick test
K.M.J. is supported in part by the 2007 AAAAI Fellow-in-Training Research Award and NIH K12 HD052890. S.H.S. and H.A.S. are supported in part by grants from the NIH, AI44236 and AI066738. A.N.-W. is supported in part by grant NIH NIAID K23 AI059318. The funding to the General Clinical Research Center comes partially from NIH M01 RR00071.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: K. M. Järvinen has received research support from the National Institutes of Health and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. S. H. Sicherer is a consultant for the Food Allergy Initiative, has received research support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and is medical adviser for the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network. H. A. Sampson is a consultant for and shareholder in Allertein Pharmaceuticals, has received research support and is a consultant and scientific adviser for the Food Allergy Initiative and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is president of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, and is 45% owner of Herbal Springs, LLC. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(09)01480-8
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.006
© 2009 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 124, Issue 6 , Pages 1267-1272, December 2009
