The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 124, Issue 6 , Pages 1259-1266 , December 2009

Hypersensitivity reactions to mAbs: 105 desensitizations in 23 patients, from evaluation to treatment

Received 13 July 2009 ,Revised 3 September 2009 ,Accepted 8 September 2009.

  • Image Result

    Evaluation of a patient for desensitization. At the initial evaluation, patients with reactions that were not thought to be amenable to desensitization were excluded. Patients with symptoms suggestive

    Evaluation of a patient for desensitization. At the initial evaluation, patients with reactions that were not thought to be amenable to desensitization were excluded. Patients with symptoms suggestive of a Gell and Coombs type I HSR, including pruritus, urticaria, flushing, chest tightness, wheezing, nausea, dizziness, or neuromuscular symptoms, were evaluated by means of skin testing. If skin test results were positive, desensitization was offered. If skin test results were negative, the decision whether to offer desensitization was based on the severity of the initial reaction and clinical judgment.

  • Image Result
    Management of reactions during desensitization. The infusion was held for all reactions. Severe reactions were treated aggressively, as shown. Histamine H1 and H2 blockade was administered for all rea

    Management of reactions during desensitization. The infusion was held for all reactions. Severe reactions were treated aggressively, as shown. Histamine H1 and H2 blockade was administered for all reactions. For flushing or airway symptoms, specific treatment was initiated, as depicted.

  • Image Result
    Severity of initial reactions and reactions during desensitization. A, The percentage of patients with mild, moderate, and severe reactions is presented by agent for the initial reaction, with the tot

    Severity of initial reactions and reactions during desensitization. A, The percentage of patients with mild, moderate, and severe reactions is presented by agent for the initial reaction, with the total number of patients for each agent shown in parentheses after the name of the agent. B, Reactions during desensitization were graded as mild, moderate, severe, or no reaction and are presented as a percentage of total desensitizations for a given agent. The number of desensitizations for each agent is shown in parentheses after the name of the agent.

  • Image Result
    Characteristics of initial reactions and reactions during desensitization. The characteristics of reactions are depicted by agent for the initial reaction (A) and for reactions during desensitization

    Characteristics of initial reactions and reactions during desensitization. The characteristics of reactions are depicted by agent for the initial reaction (A) and for reactions during desensitization (B). Data in Fig 4, B, are expressed as percentages of the total desensitizations performed for each agent. CUT, Cutaneous; CV, cardiovascular; RESP, respiratory; THROAT, throat tightness, F/C, fever/chills; GI, gastrointestinal; NEURO, neurologic/muscular.

  • Image Result
    Timing of reactions during desensitization. The steps at which reactions occurred among 30 reactions during desensitization are shown as a percentage of all reactions. One patient with an extended pro

    Timing of reactions during desensitization. The steps at which reactions occurred among 30 reactions during desensitization are shown as a percentage of all reactions. One patient with an extended protocol reacted in the final step, and this reaction was included under step 12.

  • Image Result
    Reactions over multiple desensitizations. The frequency of reactions at each desensitization number is presented. The number of patients who reached each number of desensitizations is indicated in par

    Reactions over multiple desensitizations. The frequency of reactions at each desensitization number is presented. The number of patients who reached each number of desensitizations is indicated in parentheses.

 The desensitization program at Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's hospital is supported in part by Ovations for the Cure.

 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: P. J. Brennan received research support from the National Institutes of Health. T Rodriguez Bouza received research support from Real Colegio Complutense. F. I. Hsu received research support from Dyax. D. E. Sloane previously served on the speakers' bureau for Genentech and Novartis. M. C. Castells served as a consultant for Schering-Plough and ICON, received research support from Ovations for the Cure, and served as an expert witness on adverse drug reactions and desensitizations.

PII: S0091-6749(09)01338-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.009

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 124, Issue 6 , Pages 1259-1266 , December 2009