« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 124, Issue 5
, Pages
903-910.e7
, November 2009
Predicting the long-term prognosis of children with symptoms suggestive of asthma at preschool age
-
Predicted and observed risk of asthma development at 7 to 8 years of age per prediction score category. The number of children observed per category is shown in brackets. Expected risk is estimated by
Predicted and observed risk of asthma development at 7 to 8 years of age per prediction score category. The number of children observed per category is shown in brackets. Expected risk is estimated by using the average score per 5-point category. ∗Estimate for the merged category (≥35 points) is weighed by the number of children actually observed at each 5-point subcategory between 35 and 55 points.
-
Receiver operating characteristic curve of categorized prediction score on the outcome of asthma at 7 to 8 years of age. Cutoff values of prediction scores are reported in the curve (dots). The area uReceiver operating characteristic curve of categorized prediction score on the outcome of asthma at 7 to 8 years of age. Cutoff values of prediction scores are reported in the curve (dots). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (C-index) for the categorized score is 0.736 (before validation). Also, the sensitivity and specificity for a doctor's diagnosis of asthma at the age when symptoms were first reported (between 0 and 4 years) are displayed (square).
-
Proportion of children with asthma at 7 to 8 years of age explained by the proportion of children at highest risk according to the prediction score. Cutoff values of prediction scores are reported inProportion of children with asthma at 7 to 8 years of age explained by the proportion of children at highest risk according to the prediction score. Cutoff values of prediction scores are reported in the curve (dots). Also, data for a doctor's diagnosis of asthma at the age when symptoms were first reported (between 0-4 years) are displayed (square).
-
Flowchart of the study population. ∗Two thousand seven hundred seventy-nine allergic and 5,083 nonallergic mothers were invited, as determined before initiation of the study based on a power calculatiFlowchart of the study population. ∗Two thousand seven hundred seventy-nine allergic and 5,083 nonallergic mothers were invited, as determined before initiation of the study based on a power calculation. Of the 4,146 women included in the study, the proportion of allergic women (31%) was very similar to that in the general Dutch population. †Symptoms were defined as a positive response to the following questions: “Has your child had wheezing or whistling in the chest in the last 12 months?,” “Has your child had cough during the night, when he/she did not have a cold or a chest infection, in the last 12 months?,” or both. Reasons for loss to follow-up included lack of motivation, illness of child, repeated nonresponse, moved, and personal reasons.
Supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research; the Netherlands Asthma Fund; the Netherlands Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing, and the Environment; and the Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. The salary of D. C. was paid by a “Toptalent” grant from Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: The authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(09)01011-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.045
© 2009 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 124, Issue 5
, Pages
903-910.e7
, November 2009
