Received 11 August 2008; received in revised form 11 March 2009; accepted 23 March 2009.
Oral food challenges are procedures conducted by allergists/immunologists to make an accurate diagnosis of immediate, and occasionally delayed, adverse reactions to foods. The timing of the challenge is carefully chosen based on the individual patient history and the results of skin prick tests and food specific serum IgE values. The type of the challenge is determined by the history, the age of the patient, and the likelihood of encountering subjective reactions. The food challenge requires preparation of the patient for the procedure and preparation of the office for the organized conduct of the challenge, for a careful assessment of the symptoms and signs and the treatment of reactions. The starting dose, the escalation of the dosing, and the intervals between doses are determined based on experience and the patient's history. The interpretation of the results of the challenge and arragements for follow-up after a challenge are important. A negative oral food challenge result allows introduction of the food into the diet, whereas a positive oral food challenge result provides a sound basis for continued avoidance of the food.
aJaffe Food Allergy Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
bCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
cLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, La
dNational Jewish Health and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo
eUniversity of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, Calif
Reprint requests: Amal Assa'ad, MD, Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and Past-Chair, Adverse Reactions to Foods Committee, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229.
Supported by the Food Allergy Initiative. The Food Allergy Initiative is a nonprofit corporation dedicated to finding a cure for food allergies by funding food allergy research; it does not conduct scientific research or render medical advice. The opinion in the manuscript reflects that of the authors and not that of the Food Allergy Initiative, and Food Allergy Initiative is not responsible or liable for the information set forth in the manuscript or for any damages that may result from its use.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: A. Assa'ad has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline. A. Nowak-Węgrzyn has received research support from the National Institutes of Health. S. L. Bahna has received research support from Genentech/Novartis and CSL Behring. S. H. Sicherer has received research support from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and is a consultant for the Food Allergy Initiative and a medical advisor for the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.