The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 123, Issue 1 , Pages 231-238.e4, January 2009

Impairing oral tolerance promotes allergy and anaphylaxis: A new murine food allergy model

  • Kirthana Ganeshan, BS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Colleen V. Neilsen, BS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • April Hadsaitong, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Robert P. Schleimer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Xunrong Luo, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Paul J. Bryce, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Paul Bryce, PhD, Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60610.

Received 17 July 2008; received in revised form 26 September 2008; accepted 6 October 2008. published online 21 November 2008.

Background

Food allergy is a disorder in which antigenic food proteins elicit immune responses. Animal models of food allergy have several limitations that influence their utility, including failure to recapitulate several key immunologic hallmarks. Consequently, little is known regarding the pathogenesis and mechanisms leading to food allergy. Staphylococcus aureus–derived enterotoxins, a common cause of food contamination, are associated with antigen responses in atopic dermatitis.

Objective

We hypothesized that S aureus–derived enterotoxins might influence the development of food allergy. We examined the influence of administration of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) with food allergens on immunologic responses and compared these responses with those elicited by a cholera toxin–driven food allergy model.

Methods

Oral administration of ovalbumin or whole peanut extract with or without SEB was performed once weekly. After 8 weeks, mice were challenged with oral antigen alone, and the physiologic and immunologic responses to antigen were studied.

Results

SEB administered with antigen resulted in immune responses to the antigen. Responses were highly TH2 polarized, and oral challenge with antigen triggered anaphylaxis and local and systemic mast cell degranulation. SEB-driven sensitization induced eosinophilia in the blood and intestinal tissues not observed with cholera toxin sensitization. SEB impaired tolerance specifically by impairing expression of TGF-β and regulatory T cells, and tolerance was restored with high-dose antigen.

Conclusions

We demonstrate a new model of food allergy to oral antigen in common laboratory strains of mice that recapitulates many features of clinical food allergy that are not seen in other models. We demonstrate that SEB impairs oral tolerance and permits allergic responses.

Key words: Food allergy, Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B, TH2, anaphylaxis, murine, peanut, ovalbumin, tolerance, mast cells, eosinophils

Abbreviations used: AD, Atopic dermatitis, CT, Cholera toxin, OVA, Ovalbumin, SEB, Staphylococcal enterotoxin B, TIM, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain molecule, Treg, Regulatory T, WPE, Whole peanut extract

 

 Supported by the Food Allergy Project. R.P.S. was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants RO1 HL068546, HL078860, and AI072570. P.J.B. was supported by NIH grants RO1 AI076456 and R21 AI078525.

 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: X. Luo has received research support from the National Institutes of Health and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

PII: S0091-6749(08)01854-X

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.10.011

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 123, Issue 1 , Pages 231-238.e4, January 2009