Volume 123, Issue 1 , Pages 116-121.e10, January 2009
High-dose inhaled corticosteroids versus add-on long-acting β-agonists in asthma: An observational study
Background
Guidelines recommend that for patients uncontrolled on inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), step-up options include an increase in ICS dosage or addition of a long-acting β-agonist (LABA). Controversy persists about the best option in routine practice.
Objective
To compare asthma outcomes in patients whose first step-up from ICS monotherapy was by addition of LABA (LABA cohort) or increase in ICS dosage or formulation (ICS cohort).
Methods
Observational study using the General Practice Research Database, comparing outcomes in the following 12 months with regression modeling allowing for baseline cohort differences: age, sex, socioeconomic status, body mass index, comorbidity (rhinitis, heart disease), smoking status, short-acting β-agonist (SABA) use, oral corticosteroid use, and use of asthma complicating medication.
Results
We found 46,930 patients in the ICS and 17,418 in the LABA cohort. In adjusted analysis, the odds ratio (95% CI) of successful treatment (no hospitalization, no oral corticosteroid use, average daily SABA use <1 dose/d) was lower in the ICS cohort (0.75; 0.72-0.79). The adjusted odds ratio of needing rescue SABA prescriptions was higher in the ICS cohort (1.67; 1.59-1.76). However, the adjusted odds of using any oral corticosteroids were lower (0.75; 0.71-0.78), particularly of using 3 or more courses (0.50, 0.46-0.55), and the adjusted odds of respiratory hospitalization were lower (0.69; 0.59-0.81).
Conclusion
Although symptomatic control and rescue bronchodilator use may be improved by the addition of a LABA to ICS, there may be a lower risk of severe exacerbations and hospitalizations from ICS dose increase.
Key words: Asthma, long-acting β-agonist, inhaled corticosteroid, safety, inflammation, observational study
Abbreviations used: BMI, Body mass index, GINA, Global Initiative for Asthma, GPRD, General Practice Research Database, ICS, Inhaled corticosteroid, IQR, Interquartile range, LABA, Long-acting β-agonist, OR, Odds ratio, SABA, Short-acting β-agonist, UK, United Kingdom
Costs for accessing the General Practice Research Database were met by Schering-Plough.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Thomas has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., Inc., and AstraZeneca and has served on the speakers' bureau for Merck & Co., Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline. A. J. Lee has received funding from Altana Pharma for trial committee work and from Respiratory Research Limited for statistical consulting. D. Price has consultant arrangements with Aerocrine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dey Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Schering-Plough, and Teva; has received grants and research support from the UK National Health Service, Aerocrine, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Schering-Plough, and Teva; and is on the speakers' bureau for Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme, and Pfizer. J. von Ziegenweidt has declared that she has no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(08)01732-6
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.09.035
© 2009 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 123, Issue 1 , Pages 116-121.e10, January 2009
