Volume 123, Issue 2 , Pages 452-458.e4, February 2009
Soybean (Glycine max) allergy in Europe: Gly m 5 (β-conglycinin) and Gly m 6 (glycinin) are potential diagnostic markers for severe allergic reactions to soy
Background
Soybean is considered an important allergenic food, but published data on soybean allergens are controversial.
Objective
We sought to identify relevant soybean allergens and correlate the IgE-binding pattern to clinical characteristics in European patients with confirmed soy allergy.
Methods
IgE-reactive proteins were identified from a soybean cDNA expression library, purified from natural soybean source, or expressed in Escherichia coli. The IgE reactivity in 30 sera from subjects with a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled soybean challenge (n = 25) or a convincing history of anaphylaxis to soy (n = 5) was analyzed by ELISA or CAP-FEIA.
Results
All subunits of Gly m 5 (β-conglycinin) and Gly m 6 (glycinin) were IgE-reactive: 53% (16/30) of the study subjects had specific IgE to at least 1 major storage protein, 43% (13/30) to Gly m 5 , and 36% (11/30) to Gly m 6. Gly m 5 was IgE-reactive in 5 of 5 and Gly m 6 in 3 of 5 children. IgE-binding to Gly m 5 or Gly m 6 was found in 86% (6/7) subjects with anaphylaxis to soy and in 55% (6/11) of subjects with moderate but only 33% (4/12) of subjects with mild soy-related symptoms. The odds ratio (P < .05) for severe versus mild allergic reactions in subjects with specific IgE to Gly m 5 or Gly m6 was 12/1.
Conclusion
Sensitization to the soybean allergens Gly m 5 or Gly m 6 is potentially indicative for severe allergic reactions to soy.
Key words: Soybean allergy, soybean allergens, β-conglycinin, glycinin, DBPCFC, anaphylaxis, cDNA expression library
Abbreviations used: AP, Alkaline phosphatase, BC, β-Conglycinin, Gly m 5, DBPCFC, Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, G, Glycinin, Gly m 6, IUIS, International Union of Immunological Societies, OAS, Oral allergy syndrome, OR, Odds ratio, pfu, Plaque-forming unit
Supported by the 5th Framework Programme: Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources of the European Commission, QLK4-CT-2001-00301, and by the Swiss Federal Office for Education and Science, BBW01.0159-1.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: C. Bindslev-Jensen has served as an expert witness in a patient antihistamine injury case. L. K. Poulsen has served as an expert witness for Novozymes Ltd. S. Vieths is an associate at the Institute for Product Quality Berlin; has received honoraria from Phadia and the Food Allergy Resource and Research Program; has received research support from the European Union, the Germany Research Society, the Research Fund of the German Food Industry, Monsanto Co, and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicine and Health Care; and has served as a member of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the International Union of Immunological Diseases, the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, the European Pharmacopoeia Commission, the International Life Sciences Institute Health and Environmental Science Institute, the European Committee for Standardization, and Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Allergie und Klinische Immunologie. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(08)01729-6
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.09.034
© 2009 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 123, Issue 2 , Pages 452-458.e4, February 2009
