The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 122, Issue 2 , Pages 225-235, August 2008

Airway injury as a mechanism for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes

  • Sandra D. Anderson, PhD, DSc

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Sandra D. Anderson, PhD, DSc, Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, 11 West, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 50 Missenden Road, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia.
  • ,
  • Pascale Kippelen, PhD

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, and the University of Aberdeen School of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Received 1 April 2008; received in revised form 30 April 2008; accepted 1 May 2008. published online 13 June 2008.

Article Outline

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a consequence of evaporative water loss in conditioning the inspired air. The water loss causes cooling and dehydration of the airway surface. One acute effect of dehydration is the release of mediators, such as prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and histamine, that can stimulate smooth muscle, causing contraction and a change in vascular permeability. Inspiring cold air increases dehydration of the surface area and causes changes in bronchial blood flow. This article proposes that the pathogenesis of EIB in elite athletes relates to the epithelial injury arising from breathing poorly conditioned air at high flows for long periods of time or high volumes of irritant particles or gases. The evidence to support this proposal comes from many markers of injury. The restorative process after injury involves plasma exudation and movement of cells into the airways, a process repeated many times during a season of training. This process has the potential to expose smooth muscle to a wide variety of plasma- and cell-derived substances. The exposure to these substances over time can lead to an alteration in the contractile properties of the smooth muscle, making it more sensitive to mediators of bronchoconstriction. It is proposed that cold-weather athletes have airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to pharmacologic agents as a result of epithelial injury. In those who are allergic, AHR can also be expressed as EIB. The role of β2-receptor agonists in inhibiting and enhancing the development of AHR and EIB is discussed.

Key words: Epithelial injury, airway smooth muscle, mast cells, microvascular permeability, eicosanoids, β2-agonists

Abbreviations used: AHR, Airway hyperresponsiveness, ASL, Airway surface liquid, ASM, Airway smooth muscle, CC16, 16-kd Clara cell protein, EIB, Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, EVH, Eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, 15 HETE, 15 Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, 5-LO, 5-Lipoxygenase, LT, Leukotriene, LTRA, Leukotriene receptor antagonist, MVP, Microvascular permeability, PG, Prostaglandin

 

Back to Article Outline

Information for Category 1 CME Credit 

Credit can now be obtained, free for a limited time, by reading the review articles in this issue. Please note the following instructions.

Method of Physician Participation in Learning Process: The core material for these activities can be read in this issue of the Journal or online at the JACI Web site: www.jacionline.org. The accompanying tests may only be submitted online at www.jacionline.org. Fax or other copies will not be accepted.

Date of Original Release: August 2008. Credit may be obtained for these courses until July 31, 2010.

Copyright Statement: Copyright © 2008-2010. All rights reserved.

Overall Purpose/Goal: To provide excellent reviews on key aspects of allergic disease to those who research, treat, or manage allergic disease.

Target Audience: Physicians and researchers within the field of allergic disease.

Accreditation/Provider Statements and Credit Designation: The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AAAAI designates these educational activities for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

List of Design Committee Members: Authors: Sandra D. Anderson, PhD, DSc, and Pascale Kippelen, PhD

Activity Objectives

1. To understand the mechanisms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and airway hyperresponsiveness in elite athletes.

2. To understand the role of inflammatory cells and mediators in EIB.

3. To review the therapeutic approaches for EIB in athletes.

Recognition of Commercial Support: This CME activity has not received external commercial support.

Disclosure of Significant Relationships with Relevant Commercial

Companies/Organizations: Sandra D. Anderson owns stock in Pharmaxis Pty Ltd and has received research support from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Pascale Kippelen has received research support from NHS Grampian and the British Olympic Association.

In 1999, the year before the Summer Olympic Games in Sydney, there was still debate about the mechanism whereby exercise provokes airway narrowing.1 The initiating stimulus had been identified 20 years earlier as evaporative water loss after it was shown that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was markedly inhibited or even completely abolished by preventing that loss.2, 3, 4 The relative importance of the thermal (cooling) and osmotic (drying) consequences of the water loss, however, remained unclear. It was clear that abnormal cooling of the airways was not necessary for them to narrow because severe EIB could occur when hot dry air was inspired.5, 6, 7

Both release of inflammatory mediators and contraction of airway smooth muscle (ASM) were central to the osmotic theory of EIB.1, 8 In 2000, it was proposed that EIB, as described in asthmatic subjects, is an exaggerated response to airway dehydration in the presence of inflammatory cells and their mediators.1 By contrast, the thermal theory proposed a purely mechanical cause of airway narrowing involving vasoconstriction of the bronchial vasculature in response to airway cooling, followed by a reactive hyperemia accompanied by vascular leakage and airway edema.9, 10 The cooling and osmotic aspects of water loss were brought together by the suggestion that cold dry air be considered not only for its capacity to cool the airways but also for its potential to increase the area of the airway surface becoming dehydrated and hyperosmotic during exercise.1

Everyone has to condition inspired air, and therefore respiratory water loss is common to all during exercise. The ability to return water to the airway surface, however, is likely to be different for the healthy and the inflamed lower airway, just as it is in the upper airway.11 In healthy persons the upper limit of the decrease in FEV1 is less than 10% in response to breathing dry air at high flows, and the response can be enhanced by breathing cold air.12, 13

Back to Article Outline

Water return in response to dehydration and increased osmolarity 

It appears that the return of water to the airway surface is not sufficiently fast to prevent the progressive recruitment of generations of airways into the humidifying process over 6 to 8 minutes of intense exercise while breathing dry air.1, 14 That water is not replaced almost instantaneously in response to an osmotic force seems surprising. It can be explained in part by the increase in concentrations of Na+ and Cl ions delaying the water flux caused by the osmotic gradient because the restoration of a normal balance of Cl and Na+ ions on the airway surface takes precedence over restoration of normal osmolarity.15, 16 The water flux in response to ion concentration occurs through activation of ion channels,16 whereas the water flux in response to osmotic changes is through activation of aquaporins.17 The release of adenosine triphosphate at the airway surface in response to sheer stress, a change in osmolarity of the airway surface liquid (ASL), or both is also likely to be an important mechanism for restoration of normal ASL volume during exercise.18

In persons with clinically recognized asthma, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to water loss appears early in the disease as EIB and is related to airway inflammation, particularly the presence of eosinophils.19 Inflammation is implied by the significant reduction in severity of EIB in most asthmatic subjects when they are treated with inhaled steroids daily for 3 to 12 weeks.20, 21, 22 The reduction in severity of EIB increases with the dose of steroid and is usually associated with a reduction in the number of eosinophils.23

Back to Article Outline

Athletes with AHR 

By the late 1990s, EIB was being reported quite frequently in cold-weather athletes.24, 25, 26 The possibility was raised that edema and excessive mucus could amplify the small decrease in FEV1 that normally occurs and account for this increase in prevalence of EIB in cold-weather athletes.27 It was proposed that the amplifying effect would be sufficient for a mild responder to achieve the 10% decrease required for the diagnosis of EIB.

There also appeared to be a difference in symptoms and AHR when the ambient environment for training varied, as it did between Norway at −5°C and Sweden at −20°C. Thus Swedish cross-country skiers reported more cough on winter training (64% vs 42%, P < .01) and had a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms on exposure to cold (45% vs 14%, P < .001), AHR to methacholine (43% vs 14%, P < .001), current asthma (28% vs 9%, P < .01), and clinically diagnosed asthma (42% vs 12%, P < .001).28 The Swedish skiers were also more likely to consult their doctor, to be given a diagnosis of asthma, and to take medication. Self-reported allergy was not associated with asthma symptoms, AHR, or current asthma. One in 3 skiers with a positive response to methacholine had no symptoms at all.28

It was also considered at the time that the “asthma” symptoms of breathlessness, cough, and increased mucus production (on exercise), reported frequently by cold-weather athletes, could be accounted for by the cooling and osmotic effects of airway dehydration.27 For example, stimulation of sensory nerves29 and mucous glands30 could cause cough, breathlessness, and the excessive mucus production reported in cold-weather athletes.31, 32

Athletes performing endurance sports were also reported to have a higher prevalence of nonspecific AHR than those performing other sports,33, 34 and the reason for this required an explanation.

Back to Article Outline

Unexpected findings on AHR and EIB in athletes 

It was common at that time to use pharmacologic agents, such as methacholine, to demonstrate AHR in athletes with possible asthma rather than to use exercise or a surrogate of exercise (eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea [EVH] or hyperosmolar aerosols). The new insights into the pathogenesis of EIB came from unexpected findings in athletes when investigators compared responses to pharmacologic challenge with responses to exercise and its surrogates in the same subjects. In 2002, it was reported that elite summer athletes were less sensitive to provocation with methacholine than they were to provocation with EVH or inhaled dry powder mannitol.35, 36 These findings were not accounted for by the higher (20%) decrease in FEV1 from baseline required to identify AHR to methacholine compared with EVH (10%) or mannitol (15%). There are at least 2 possible explanations for these findings. First, the mediators involved in EIB and hyperosmolar aerosols (prostaglandin [PG] D2 and leukotriene [LT] E437, 38, 39, 40) are 100 and 1000 times as potent as methacholine and histamine in healthy persons.41, 42 Second, finding a negative response to a pharmacologic challenge in a person with a positive response to exercise has usually been made in persons with very good lung function.43, 44 Both these observations might explain why EIB precedes AHR to pharmacologic agents by many years in children.45, 46

In contrast to summer athletes, winter athletes with good lung function have a high prevalence of AHR to methacholine, and yet the same athletes have a low prevalence of positive responses to EVH, mannitol, AMP,47 or exercise.48 This raises the question as to whether the AHR in cold-weather/dry-weather athletes is a reflection of airway injury rather than a sign of classical asthma. The AHR in these winter athletes is also much milder than would be expected in subjects with classical asthma.49 There are some summer athletes who also appear to have airway injury. Thus swimmers who train for long hours in irritant environments might also have a high prevalence of reported AHR to methacholine.50, 51

There are differences in the mode of action of the provoking stimuli used to assess athletes. For example, the pharmacologic agent methacholine acts directly on acetylcholine receptors to cause bronchial smooth muscle contraction. The transient hyperosmotic effects of evaporative water loss or the inhalation of hyperosmolar aerosols are not a direct stimulus to the smooth muscle. Rather the hyperosmolar stimulus acts indirectly through release of mediators from inflammatory cells (mast cells and eosinophils) situated in or close to the airway surface. These mediators, including PGD2, LTE4, and histamine, then act on receptors to cause contraction of the smooth muscle and narrowing of the airways. The same mediators can increase vascular permeability. Hyperosmolarity is a stimulus for epithelial cells to produce PGE2 and 15 hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15 HETE) and for neuronal cells to release tachykinins.52, 53 Adenosine is also released in response to hyperosmolarity.54 All these outcomes help to restore the ASL toward normal ion concentration, volume, and osmolarity.

Another unexpected finding was that the AHR in cross-country skiers with symptoms of asthma was not improved by treatment with inhaled steroids, a benefit well-described in asthmatic subjects.55 Respiratory symptoms and airway responses only improved after a reduction in workload during training, a finding in keeping with less injury.55 An important and unexpected finding was that montelukast provided greater protection against EIB (90%) in a high-particulate-matter environment compared with that seen in a low-particulate-matter environment (35%), suggesting the response to the particulate matter is predominantly LT mediated.56 Finally, an unexpected finding came from the Winter Olympics in Turin. In those games only 32.1% of the athletes applying to use a β2-adrenoceptor agonist (β2-agonist) reported asthma in childhood, and for 48.7% of them, the onset of asthma or EIB occurred after 20 years of age, which is very unusual.57

Back to Article Outline

Pathogenesis of AHR and EIB in athletes 

In 2005, an hypothesis for the pathogenesis of EIB and AHR in elite athletes was put forward (Fig 1).58 In brief, the hypothesis proposed that when cold air was inspired at high flow, the epithelia of the small airways recruited into the conditioning process would become susceptible to dehydration injury. The response to this epithelial injury would involve exudation of bulk plasma as part of the restorative process.59, 60 In elite athletes performing winter sports, this process of epithelial injury and repair would be repeated many times during the season (Fig 2).61 It was proposed that AHR and EIB could develop for the first time58 as a result of changes in the contractile properties of ASM after repeated exposure to plasma-derived products.61, 62 Thus cold-weather athletes could experience AHR to pharmacologic agents simply as a result of epithelial injury and repair. This concept was supported by the return to the normal range of airway responsiveness out of season63 or after retirement.64 Furthermore, this reversal of AHR suggests that airway remodeling does not occur in response to this type of acute injury and is likely not a predictor of chronic disease.65

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 1. 

    Flow chart describing the acute events leading to EIB in the subject with classic asthma (left) and the events leading to the development of EIB in the athlete (right). Reproduced with permission from Anderson SD, Kippelen P. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: Pathogenesis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2005;5:116-22.58

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 2. 

    A diagram of the airway mucosa in which exudative inflammation goes on either with the epithelium intact (left) or with shedding and restitution as a prominent feature (right). In both conditions plasma-derived adhesive proteins and other plasma-derived effector solutes contribute significantly to the molecular milieu of the lamina propria, epithelium, and mucosal surface. PAF, Platelet-activating factor; ECP, eosinophil cationic protein; MBP, major basic protein. Reproduced with permission from Persson CG, Erjefalt JS, Andersson M, Greiff L, Svensson C. Extravasation, lamina propria flooding and lumenal entry of bulk plasma exudate in mucosal defence, inflammation and repair. Pulm Pharmacol 1996;9:129-39.61

For summer athletes, who are more likely to be atopic,66 have rhinitis, and have higher than normal levels of circulating IgE, the ASM would become “passively sensitized” in vivo as a result of transient but repeated exposure to bulk plasma.58, 67 The degree to which this could happen would likely be related to circulating levels of IgE.67, 68

It had been known for several years that some athletes have an increase in circulating levels of inflammatory mediators, such as LTs and PGs, in response to exercise.69, 70 Furthermore, mast cells close to the ASM had been described in the small airways of healthy subjects.71 It was proposed that EIB could be the end result of the ASM becoming more sensitive to these mediators through changes in its contractile properties brought about by sensitization.58

Back to Article Outline

Evidence for airway injury 

In the last 10 years, attention has been focused on cellular responses in the airways associated with airway injury and the potential for these responses to explain AHR. First, there is evidence, consistent with wound healing and injury, from a study reporting an increase in tenascin in the basement membrane of skiers (Fig 3).72 Second, in keeping with airway injury, many athletes have increased numbers of neutrophils in their sputum.72, 73, 74, 75 Third, the severity of EIB in asthmatic subjects is related to epithelial cell numbers in the sputum at baseline, presumably a marker of epithelial injury.76 Fourth, epithelial cells are a source of the protective PGE2, and a reduction in PGE2 levels in relation to cysteinyl LT levels was shown in the same asthmatic subjects and is also in keeping with injury.77 Fifth, there is increased expression of the gene MUC5, which is important in the production of mucus, a key defense mechanism of the airways to cope with dehydration injury.78 Finally, direct evidence of damage and repair of the bronchiolar epithelium has been shown both after endurance training in mice79 and after dry air challenges in dogs.80

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 3. 

    Thickness of the tenascin immunoreactive band in the subepithelial basement membrane zone in control subjects, skiers with and without bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR), and asthmatic subjects. The horizontal bar indicates median value. The graph is reproduced with permission from Karjalainen E-M, Laitinen A, Sue-Chu M, Altraja A, Bjermer L, Laitinen LA. Evidence of airway inflammation and remodeling in ski athletes with and without bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:2086-91.72 The histomicrograph of the tenascin band for one skier is shown in brown and was provided by Malcolm Sue-Chu.

Stimulation of epithelial cells by means of hyperosmolarity and airway cooling leads to an increased production of IL-8.81 The increased levels of IL-8 might account for the neutrophilia observed in athletes performing heavy exercise.72, 74, 82, 83 Further exposure to particulate matter, such as diesel fuel, is a stimulus to attract neutrophils.84 Elite endurance-trained athletes seem more prone to viral infections, and therefore neutrophils might be present in the airways for a longer duration than in nonexercising subjects.85, 86 For athletes exposed to particulate matter, irritants, and viral infections, there might be activation of innate immune or other mechanisms rather than IgE-based mechanisms.87 These athletes might more resemble persons with neutrophilic rather than eosinophilic asthma.88 Neutrophils are known to increase the responsiveness of ASM.89 The airway inflammation caused by the presence of neutrophils can increase the sensitivity of the ASM, accounting for the increased prevalence of AHR in elite athletes. Thus the approach to treatment might need to be different between a subject with classical asthma and sputum eosinophilia and an athlete with mild EIB and sputum neutrophilia.

Back to Article Outline

ASM and mast cells 

Fernandes et al90 have stated that “smooth muscle dysfunction may be one of the first mechanisms whereby inflammation leads to AHR.” Studies in ASM in vitro have provided important supportive information. For example, sensitized ASM has increased levels of myosin light chain kinase, the significance of which is to increase the shortening velocity of the ASM.91 Other studies have demonstrated that ASM is a very active organ, secreting cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, which contribute to ASM hyperplasia and act as chemoattractants for mast cell and enhance their coexistence.92, 93

It has been suggested that infiltration of the ASM by mast cells (mast cell myositis) is the key event that makes the person asthmatic.93 Mast cells are also found in the bronchial epithelium, mucous glands,94 and peripheral airways,71 supporting the concept that these cells “function as sensors of the microenvironment.”95 Mast cell numbers are increased in sensitized human ASM96 in those with asthma, and they are even present in the ASM of healthy subjects.97 ASM responsiveness increases after incubation with mast cell products, such as TNF-α98 and tryptase.99 Sensitized ASM becomes more responsive to mediators such as histamine100 and LTD4.101

The requirement for mast cells to be present on the smooth muscle to be a case of asthma might help explain “why atopic patients do not necessarily have asthma.” Although mast cell infiltration of ASM is more likely in those who are atopic, atopy per se is not a reflection of the presence of mast cells on ASM.

Back to Article Outline

Microvascular and epithelial permeability 

Another potential factor contributing to injury and recovery is alteration in microvascular permeability (MVP), usually identified through markers of microvascular leakage. An increased MVP after exercise has been demonstrated by an increase in the sputum/serum ratio of albumin and is related to the severity of EIB (Fig 4).102 Many mediators increase MVP, and these include histamine, PGD2, LTC4, and Substance P.103 Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin 2 also stimulate MVP, and levels after exercise are related to the severity of EIB.104, 105 Furthermore, the angiopoietin 2 levels in asthmatic subjects were reduced with montelukast, and this might contribute to their mode of action in enhancing recovery from bronchoconstriction.106

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 4. 

    Relationship between the airway vascular permeability index (ie, the ratio of albumin concentration in induced sputum and serum) and the severity of EIB in asthmatic patients expressed as a maximal decrease from baseline and as the area under the FEV1 time curve (AUC) up to 30 minutes after exercise. Reproduced with permission from Kanazawa H, Asai K, Hirata K, Yoshikawa J. Vascular involvement in exercise-induced airway narrowing in patients with bronchial asthma. Chest 2002;122:166-70.102

Recently, a new approach based on the assay in serum or urine of lung-derived proteins107 gave support to the hypothesis of altered pulmonary epithelial permeability after intense exercise. A transient increase in serum of one of the major proteins secreted by Clara cells in the airways (ie, the 16-kd Clara cell protein [CC16]) was shown in firefighters both after submaximal fire tasks and near-maximal treadmill exercise.108 A peak of CC16 levels in serum was also identified immediately after strenuous exercise in trained swimmers, although not in recreational swimmers.109 This could suggest a link between training status, exercise intensity, or both and the degree of “leakiness” of CC16 from the airways into the bloodstream. The higher the fitness level of the individual, the intensity of the exercise, or both, the more likely the epithelial barrier will be disrupted by hyperpnea-induced osmotic changes of the airway lining fluid during exercise. Interestingly, the postexercise peak of CC16 was present in trained athletes both in the copper/silver pool and in the chlorinated pool.109 This is in contradiction with some earlier studies, which identified an increase of CC16 levels in serum only after exercise in an air-polluted environment.110

Several human exposure and laboratory animal studies have shown transient changes in serum CC16 concentrations after exposure to pulmonary irritants.111 Recent studies performed on children attending indoor chlorinated swimming pools suggest that trichloramine, together probably with aerosolized hypochlorous acid and chloramines, could damage the lung epithelium109 and promote the development of asthma, especially in atopic children.112, 113, 114, 115 This concept is in keeping with the high prevalence of asthma and AHR in elite swimmers.83 Moreover, recent serum CC16 results obtained in cyclists before and after exercise confirm that the lung epithelial barrier is particularly sensitive to ozone-oxidative stress.110

It is possible, however, that an increase in MVP might be a normal adaptation to excessive dehydration in an attempt to restore normal ionic and osmotic environment.80, 116, 117, 118 Furthermore, an increase in MVP and leakage might be an epiphenomenon of exercise rather than a cause of EIB.119, 120

Back to Article Outline

Neurogenic inflammation 

Injury to the epithelium exposes sensory nerve endings to exogenous foreign particles and to endogenous inflammatory mediators. Removal of the epithelium from human isolated bronchi enhances the contractile response to tachykinins121 by removing functional neutral endopeptidase and slowing tachykinin degradation.122

In patients with asthma, a tachykinin neurokinin 1 (NK1)/NK2 receptor antagonist has been shown to block neurokinin A–induced bronchoconstriction.123 It seems reasonable to speculate that in cold-weather athletes EIB could be partly mediated by neuropeptide from airway sensory nerves. This hypothesis is attractive because sensory neuropeptides are well known for enhancing tracheobronchial MVP, respiratory secretion, and mucociliary transport.124 Moreover, the neutrophil infiltration that follows sensory nerve stimulation is consistent with the neutrophilia observed in skiers with “ski asthma.”72 Finally, experimental evidence suggest that the calcitonin gene-related peptide could modulate sulfidopeptide LT-induced responses125 and be involved in the pathophysiology of EIB.126

Back to Article Outline

Eicosanoids 

Key enzymes in the biosynthesis of eicosanoids, such as secreted phospholipase A2–X are overexpressed in epithelial cells and macrophages in response to exercise in asthmatic subjects.127 The events summarized in Fig 5 emphasize that physical activity in healthy subjects can trigger transcription of the genes ALOX5 and ALOX5AP encoding 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) and 5-LO activating protein (FLAP).128 Furthermore, it shows that 5-LO activity is influenced through changes in p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is activated by a wide variety of stimuli that include osmotic shock. Hallstrand et al127 have suggested “dysregulation” of eicosanoid synthesis in asthmatic subjects with EIB. This is supported by the finding that pharmacologic interventions that reduce the number of cells producing these mediators,69, 129 blocking their release,38 or blocking the responses130, 131 all have a favorable effect on EIB.

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 5. 

    Model of transcription response and activation changes in exercise-induced asthma– relevant mediators focusing on the LT pathway. ERK, Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FLAP-5, lipoxygenase-activating protein; JNK, c-Jun NH2–terminal kinases; MAPKAP, mitogen-activated protein kinase–activated protein; MEKK, MAPK/ERK kinase; MEK, MAPK/ERK; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; ROS, reactive oxygen species; STAT6, signal transducer and activator of transcription. Reproduced with permission from Hilberg T. Etiology of exercise-induced asthma: physical stress-induced transcription. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2007;7:27-32.128

LTs have long been recognized as playing an important role in EIB. The levels of LTE4 are increased after exercise in asthmatic and healthy subjects who exercise at the same intensity as elite athletes.69, 70 Studies with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) show that although other mediators initiate the decrease in lung function, LTs sustain the airway narrowing after exercise. Thus recovery from EIB is markedly enhanced in the presence of LTRAs. Agents that block the 5-LO pathway, such as zileuton, also have a modifying effect on the severity of EIB and the response to cold air.132, 133

Another recent finding is the expression of 15-lipoxygenase (15-LO)-1 by mast cells treated with IL-4.134 An increase in osmolarity has recently been reported to activate the 15-LO-1 pathway in human cord blood–derived mast cells, which suggests a role for mast cells in the generation of 15 HETE. The significance of this for “asthma” symptoms is that 15 HETE might be important in generating the cough in response to hyperosmolarity of the ASL. 15-HETE is an endogenous ligand of the vanilloid receptor that is stimulated by capsaicin and results in cough.135 Cough can occur in healthy subjects exercising in dry environments, and the frequency of cough is reduced as the water content of the inspired air increases.136

Research into the role of inflammatory mediators has been facilitated by the development of sensitive assays. For example, the immunoassay developed for measurement of 9α,11β-PGF2, the active metabolite of PGD2, is more widely used now and has highlighted the importance of the mast cell not only in EIB but also in asthma.95 Both sodium cromoglycate and the β2-agonist eformoterol administered acutely through inhalation inhibited the release of PGD2, and this might be one important mechanism of their action in preventing EIB.38 In addition to being potent mediators of bronchoconstriction, these PGs affect vasomotor tone and cell recruitment.

Back to Article Outline

Role of β2-agonists 

Considerable attention has been given in recent years to the subject of β2-agonists.57, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143 Daily use of this class of drug induces tolerance that is manifested in several ways. First, there is a reduction in the duration of the protective effect of both short- and long-acting β2-agonists against stimuli mediated through the mast cell, such as exercise, allergen, and hyperosmolar aerosols. The tolerance is in part attributed to the sequestration and degradation of mast cell β-receptors, making the cells more susceptible to osmotic and allergic stimuli, and in part due to generic polymorphisms of the β2-adrenoceptor ADRB2.144 Second, tolerance of the ASM is demonstrated by slow recovery from bronchoconstriction in response to a β2-agonist. This has been shown when exercise and methacholine have been used as the provoking agents.145, 146 The greater the bronchoconstriction provoked, the greater the tolerance.137 Fortunately, both manifestations of tolerance are reversed 72 hours after discontinuation of β2-agonist therapy.146 Furthermore, tolerance does not develop to the protective effects when formoterol is taken 3 times weekly,147 although the effects on recovery from bronchoconstriction are not known with this dosing regimen.

The question that is important to athletes is whether, on balance, the use of β2-agonists enhances or inhibits the development of AHR and EIB. β2-Agonists have a wide range of actions at many different sites in the airways.148 In addition to their well-recognized effects on ASM and mast cells, there is evidence that β2-agonists reduce MVP.148, 149, 150 Reducing microvascular leakage might reduce airway injury and the development of AHR and EIB in this group.151 For example, formoterol inhibits the histamine-induced plasma exudation in the lower airways of human subjects,152 probably by inhibiting endothelial gap formation.149 There might be additional antiexudative benefits when the β2-agonists are used in conjunction with inhaled steroids that reduce the inflammatory stimuli for vascular leakage.

On the downside, a reduction in the number of β2-receptors on mast cells might reduce the threshold for release of mediators in response to osmotic141, 153 and allergic154 stimuli. Tryptase levels after allergen challenge were enhanced after regular use of β2-agonists.155 In patients with rhinitis, but not asthma, there was an increase in sensitivity to hypertonic saline after daily treatment with β2-agonists for 4 weeks.156 In asthmatic subjects 2 weeks' treatment with 800 μg/d salbutamol increased the late response to allergen in association with an increase in eosinophils.157 Studies have reported an increase in AHR and a decrease in recovery time with daily use of β2-agonists, and these reports have recently been reviewed.141, 153

The mechanism for the smooth muscle becoming more sensitive with daily use of β2-agonists is of interest and could result from an increase in the number of histamine receptors,158 cross-talk between the relaxing and contractile pathways through Gs protein, or both (Fig 6).141, 159, 160 This cross-talk functionally antagonizes β2-receptor responses in vitro and in vivo.161, 162

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig 6. 

    β2-Agonists stimulate β2-receptors to activate adenyl cyclase through Gαs protein. This increases cyclic AMP levels and leads to relaxation. Chronic use can lead to cross-talk between the pathways when contraction is mediated through Gαq protein–coupled receptors, such as histamine, cysteinyl LT, thromboxane A2, or muscarinic M3 receptors. The figure is based on McGraw et al159 and reproduced with permission from Anderson SD, Caillaud C, Brannan JD. β2-agonists and exercise-induced asthma. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2006;31:163-80.141

The frequency of β2-agonist, either short-acting β-agonists or long-acting β-agonists, use should be audited and the dose minimized if tolerance occurs to reduce the risk of tolerance and tachyphylaxis. The audit could also include confirming that EIB still occurs and that the β2-agonist is not just being taken before exercise out of habit. The audit should also confirm whether there is a need for combination therapy for control of asthma because a β2-agonist can be prescribed separately and reserved for use before exercise. Inhaled corticosteroids alone, when taken regularly in an adequate dose, reduce the severity of EIB and the consequent need for a β2-agonist. When protection from EIB is incomplete, there are also other agents that can be used in conjunction with inhaled steroids to further reduce the frequency of use of a β2-agonist. These include sodium cromoglycate or nedocromil sodium taken immediately before exercise or an LTRA taken a few hours before exercise. The International Olympic Medical Commission consensus statement on asthma (see this issue of the Journal) states that although β2-agonists remain the most effective bronchodilators, in the future, they might have a less important role in the management of asthma because EIB should be better controlled by use of other therapies. Further understanding of both the positive and negative aspects of regular use of β2-agonists in elite athletes is needed.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Anderson SD, Daviskas E. The mechanism of exercise-induced asthma is …. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:453–459
  2. Chen WY, Horton DJ. Heat and water loss from the airways and exercise-induced asthma. Respiration. 1977;34:305–313
  3. Strauss RH, McFadden ER, Ingram RH, Deal EC, Jaeger JJ, Stearns D. Influence of heat and humidity on the airway obstruction induced by exercise in asthma. J Clin Invest. 1978;61:433–440
  4. Anderson SD, Daviskas E, Schoeffel RE, Unger SF. Prevention of severe exercise-induced asthma with hot humid air. Lancet. 1979;2:629
  5. Anderson SD, Schoeffel RE, Black JL, Daviskas E. Airway cooling as the stimulus to exercise-induced asthma—a re-evaluation. Eur J Respir Dis. 1985;67:20–30
  6. Aitken ML, Marini JJ. Effect of heat delivery and extraction on airway conductance in normal and in asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985;131:357–361
  7. Argyros GJ, Phillips YY, Rayburn DB, Rosenthal RR, Jaeger JJ. Water loss without heat flux in exercise-induced bronchospasm. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:1419–1424
  8. Anderson SD. Is there a unifying hypothesis for exercise-induced asthma?. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984;73:660–665
  9. McFadden ER. Hypothesis: exercise-induced asthma as a vascular phenomenon. Lancet. 1990;1:880–883
  10. McFadden ER, Lenner KA, Strohl KP. Postexertional airway rewarming and thermally induced asthma. J Clin Invest. 1996;78:18–25
  11. Rouadi P, Baroody FM, Abbott D, Naureckas E, Solway J, Naclerio RM. A technique to measure the ability of the human nose to warm and humidify air. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87:400–406
  12. Nicolai T, Mutius EV, Reitmeir P, Wjst M. Reactivity to cold-air hyperventilation in normal and in asthmatic children in a survey of 5,697 schoolchildren in southern Bavaria. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:565–572
  13. O'Cain CF, Dowling NB, Slutsky AS, Hensley MJ, Strohl KP, McFadden ER, et al. Airway effects of respiratory heat loss in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1980;49:875–880
  14. Daviskas E, Gonda I, Anderson SD. Local airway heat and water vapour losses. Respir Physiol. 1991;84:115–132
  15. Chen BT, Yeates DB. Ion transport and regulation of respiratory tract fluid output in dogs. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90:821–831
  16. Chen BT, Yeates DB. Differentiation of ion-associated and osmotically driven water transport in canine airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1715–1722
  17. Folkesson HG, Matthay MA, Frigeri A, Verkman AS. Transepithelial water permeability in microperfused distal airways. Evidence for channel-mediated water transport. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:664–671
  18. Button B, Picher M, Boucher RC. Differential effects of cyclic and constant stress on ATP release and mucociliary transport by human airway epithelia. J Physiol. 2007;580:577–592
  19. Yoshikawa T, Shoji S, Fujii T, Kanazawa H, Kudoh S, Hirata K, et al. Severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is related to airway eosinophilic inflammation in patients with asthma. Eur Respir J. 1998;12:879–884
  20. Jonasson G, Carlsen KH, Hultquist C. Low-dose budesonide improves exercise-induced bronchospasm in schoolchildren. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2000;11:120–125
  21. Hofstra WB, Neijens HJ, Duiverman EJ, Kouwenberg JM, Mulder PG, Kuethe MC, et al. Dose-response over time to inhaled fluticasone propionate: treatment of exercise- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000;29:415–423
  22. Subbarao P, Duong M, Adelroth E, Otis J, Obminski G, Inman M, et al. Effect of ciclesonide dose and duration of therapy on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:1008–1013
  23. Duong M, Subbarao P, Adelroth E, Obminski G, Strinich T, Inman M, et al. Sputum Eosinophils and the response of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction to corticosteroid in asthma. Chest. 2008;133:404–411
  24. Provost-Craig MA, Arbour KS, Sestili DC, Chabalko JJ, Ekinci E. The incidence of exercise-induced bronchospasm in competitive figure skaters. J Asthma. 1996;33:67–71
  25. Mannix ET, Manfredi F, Farber MO. A comparison of two challenge tests for identifying exercise-induced bronchospasm in figure skaters. Chest. 1999;115:649–653
  26. Wilber RL, Rundell L, Szmedra L, Jenkinson DM, Im J, Drake SD. Incidence of exercise-induced bronchospasm in Olympic Winter Sport athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:732–737
  27. Anderson SD, Holzer K. Exercise-induced asthma: is it the right diagnosis in elite athletes?. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:419–428
  28. Sue-Chu M, Larsson L, Bjermer L. Prevalence of asthma in young cross-country skiers in central Scandinavia: differences between Norway and Sweden. Respir Med. 1996;90:99–105
  29. Pisarri TE, Jonzon A, Coleridge HM, Coleridge JC. Vagal afferent and reflex responses to changes in surface osmolarity in lower airways in dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1992;73:2305–2313
  30. Dwyer TM, Farley JM. Mucus glycoconjugate secretion in cool and hypertonic solutions. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 1997;272:L1121–L1125
  31. Rundell KW, Im J, Mayers LB, Wilber RL, Szmedra L, Schmitz HR. Self-reported symptoms and exercise-induced asthma in the elite athlete. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:208–213
  32. Sont JK, Booms P, Bel EH, Vandenbroucke JP, Sterk PJ. The severity of breathlessness during challenges with inhaled methacholine and hypertonic saline in atopic asthmatic subjects. The relationship with deep breath-induced bronchodilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:38–44
  33. Larsson K, Ohlsén P, Malmberg P, Rydström P-O, Ulriksen H. High prevalence of asthma in cross country skiers. BMJ. 1993;307:1326–1329
  34. Leuppi JD, Kuln M, Comminot C, Reinhart WH. High prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma in ice hockey players. Eur Respir J. 1998;12:13–16
  35. Holzer K, Anderson SD, Douglass J. Exercise in elite summer athletes: challenges for diagnosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:374–380
  36. Holzer K, Anderson SD, Chan H-K, Douglass J. Mannitol as a challenge test to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:534–547
  37. Brannan JD, Gulliksson M, Anderson SD, Chew N, Kumlin M. Evidence of mast cell activation and leukotriene release after mannitol inhalation. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:491–496
  38. Brannan JD, Gulliksson M, Anderson SD, Chew N, Seale JP, Kumlin M. Inhibition of mast cell PGD2 release protects against mannitol-induced airway narrowing. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:944–950
  39. Gulliksson M, Palmberg L, Nilsson G, Ahlstedt S, Kumlin M. Release of prostaglandin D2 and leukotriene C in response to hyperosmolar stimulation of mast cells. Allergy. 2006;61:1473–1479
  40. Moloney ED, Griffin S, Burke CM, Poulter LW, O'Sullivan S. Release of inflammatory mediators from eosinophils following a hyperosmolar stimulus. Respir Med. 2003;97:1–5
  41. Barnes NC, Piper PJ, Costello JF. Comparative effects of inhaled leukotriene C4, leukotriene D4, and histamine in normal human subjects. Thorax. 1984;39:500–504
  42. Hardy CC, Robinson C, Tattersfield AE, Holgate ST. The bronchoconstrictor effect of inhaled prostaglandin D2 in normal and asthmatic men. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:209–213
  43. Haby MM, Anderson SD, Peat JK, Mellis CM, Toelle BG, Woolcock AJ. An exercise challenge protocol for epidemiological studies of asthma in children: comparison with histamine challenge. Eur Respir J. 1994;7:43–49
  44. Backer V, Dirksen A, Bach-Mortensen N, Hansen KK, Laursen EM, Wendelboe D. The distribution of bronchial responsiveness to histamine and exercise in 527 children and adolescents. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;88:68–76
  45. Ernst P, Ghezzo H, Becklake MR. Risk factors for bronchial hyperresponsiveness in late childhood and early adolescence. Eur Respir J. 2002;20:635–639
  46. Jones A, Bowen M. Screening for childhood asthma using an exercise test. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:127–131
  47. Sue-Chu M, Brannan JD, Anderson SD, Chew N, Bjermer L. Airway responsiveness to methacholine (Mch), adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP), mannitol (Man), eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) and sport specific field exercise challenge (Ex) in cross country ski athletes. Eur Respir J. 2002;20:410s
  48. Stensrud T, Mykland KV, Gabrielsen K, Carlsen KH. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in skiers: field test versus methacholine provocation?. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1681–1686
  49. Langdeau J-B, Turcotte H, Bowie DM, Jobin J, Desgagné P, Boulet L-P. Airway hyperresponsiveness in elite athletes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1479–1484
  50. Potts J. Factors associated with respiratory problems in swimmers. Sports Med. 1996;21:256–261
  51. Potts J. Adverse respiratory health effects of competitive swimming: the prevalence of symptoms, illnesses and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and exercise [MD thesis] Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 1994.
  52. Koskela H, Di Sciascio M, Anderson SD, Andersson M, Chan H-K, Gadalla S, et al. Nasal hyperosmolar challenge with a dry powder of mannitol in patients with allergic rhinitis. Evidence for epithelial cell involvement. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:1627–1636
  53. Baraniuk JN, Ali M, Yuta A, Fang SY, Naranch K. Hypertonic saline nasal provocation stimulates nociceptive nerves, substance P release, and glandular mucous exocytosis in normal lumens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:655–662
  54. Lazarowski ER, Tarran R, Grubb BR, van Heusden CA, Okada S, Boucher RC. Nucleotide release provides a mechanism for airway surface liquid homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:36855–36864
  55. Sue-Chu M, Karjalainen E-M, Laitinen A, Larsson L, Laitinen LA, Bjermer L. Placebo-controlled study of inhaled budesonide on indices of airways inflammation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and bronchial biopsies in cross country skiers. Respiration. 2000;67:417–425
  56. Rundell KW, Spiering BA, Baumann JM, Evans TM. Bronchoconstriction provoked by exercise in a high-particulate-matter environment is attenuated by montelukast. Inhal Toxicol. 2005;17:99–105
  57. Fitch KD. β2-agonists at the Olympic Games. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006;31:259–268
  58. Anderson SD. Kippelen P. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: Pathogenesis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2005;5:116–122
  59. Greiff L, Andersson M, Erjefalt JS, Persson CGA, Wollmer P. Airway microvascular extravasation and luminal entry of plasma. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2003;23:301–306
  60. Greiff L, Andersson M, Coman WB, Lindberg H, Marko-Varga G, Wallwork B, et al. Challenge-induced plasma exudation and mucinous secretion in human airways. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2005;25:241–245
  61. Persson CG, Erjefalt JS, Andersson M, Greiff L, Svensson C. Extravasation, lamina propria flooding and lumenal entry of bulk plasma exudate in mucosal defence, inflammation and repair. Pulm Pharmacol. 1996;9:129–139
  62. Persson CG, Erjefalt JS, Greiff L, Andersson M, Erjefalt I, Godfrey RW, et al. Plasma-derived proteins in airway defence, disease and repair of epithelial injury. Eur Respir J. 1998;11:958–970
  63. Hemingson HB, Davis BE, Cockcroft DW. Seasonal fluctuations in airway responsiveness in elite endurance athletes. Can Respir J. 2004;11:399–401
  64. Helenius I, Rytilä P, Sarna S, Lumme A, Helenius M, Remes V, et al. Effect of continuing or finishing high-level sports on airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and asthma: a 5-year prospective follow-up study of 42 highly trained swimmers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109:962–968
  65. Kujala UM, Sarna S, Kaprio J. Use of medications and dietary supplements in later years among male former top-level athletes. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1064–1068
  66. Helenius IJ, Tikkanen HO, Sarna S, Haahtela T. Asthma and increased bronchial responsiveness in elite athletes: atopy and sport event as risk factors. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101:646–652
  67. Berger P, Walls AF, Marthan R, Tunon-de-Lara JM. Immunoglobulin E-induced passive sensitization of human airways: an immunohistochemical study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:610–616
  68. Watson N, Bodtke K, Coleman RA, Dent G, Morton BE, Ruhlmann E, et al. Role of IgE in hyperresponsiveness induced by passive sensitization of human airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:839–844
  69. Mickleborough TD, Murray RL, Ionescu AA, Lindley MR. Fish oil supplementation reduces severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:1181–1189
  70. Caillaud C, Le Creff C, Legros P, Denjean A. Strenuous exercise increases plasmatic and urinary leukotriene E4 in cyclists. Can J Appl Physiol. 2003;28:793–806
  71. Carroll NG, Mutavdzic S, James AL. Distribution and degranulation of airway mast cells in normal and asthmatic subjects. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:879–885
  72. Karjalainen E-M, Laitinen A, Sue-Chu M, Altraja A, Bjermer L, Laitinen LA. Evidence of airway inflammation and remodeling in ski athletes with and without bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:2086–2091
  73. Sue-Chu M, Henriksen AH, Bjermer L. Non-invasive evaluation of lower airway inflammation in hyper-responsive elite cross-country skiers and asthmatics. Respir Med. 1999;93:719–725
  74. Bonsignore MR, Morici G, Riccobono L, Insalaco G, Bonanno A, Profita M, et al. Airway inflammation in nonasthmatic amateur runners. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001;281:L668–L676
  75. Bonsignore MR, Morici G, Riccobono L, Profita M, Bonanno A, Paterno A, et al. Airway cells after swimming outdoors or in the sea in nonasthmatic athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1146–1152
  76. Hallstrand TS, Moody MW, Wurfel MM, Schwartz LB, Henderson WR, Aitken ML. Inflammatory basis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:679–686
  77. Hallstrand TS, Moody MW, Aitken ML, Henderson WR. Airway immunopathology of asthma with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:586–593
  78. Hallstrand TS, Debley JS, Farin FM, Henderson WR. Role of MUC5AC in the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:1092–1098
  79. Chimenti L, Morici G, Paterno A, Bonanno A, Siena L, Licciardi A, et al. Endurance training damages small airway epithelium in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:442–449
  80. Omori C, Schofield BH, Mitzner W, Freed AN. Hyperpnea with dry air causes time-dependent alterations in mucosal morphology and bronchovascular permeability. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:1043–1051
  81. Hashimoto S, Gon Y, Matsumoto K, Takeshita I, Maruoka S, Horie T. Inhalant corticosteroids inhibit hyperosmolarity-induced, and cooling and rewarming-induced interleukin-8 and RANTES production by human bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1075–1080
  82. Boulet L-P, Turcotte H, Langdeau JB, Bernier MC. Lower airway inflammatory responses to high-intensity training in athletes. Clin Invest Med. 2005;28:15–22
  83. Helenius IJ, Rytilä P, Metso T, Haahtela T, Venge P, Tikkanen HO. Respiratory symptoms, bronchial responsiveness, and cellular characteristics of induced sputum in elite swimmers. Allergy. 1998;53:346–352
  84. Nightingale JA, Rogers DF, Barnes PJ. Effect of inhaled ozone. Thorax. 1999;54:1061–1069
  85. Nieman DC, Johanssen LM, Lee JW, Arabatzis K. Infectious episodes in runners before and after the Los Angeles Marathon. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1990;30:316–328
  86. Gleeson M. Immune function in sport and exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103:693–699
  87. Douwes J, Gibson P, Pekkanen J, Pearce N. Non-eosinophilic asthma: importance and possible mechanisms. Thorax. 2002;57:643–648
  88. Gibson PG, Simpson JL, Saltos N. Heterogeneity of airway inflammation in persistent asthma: evidence of neutrophilic inflammation and increased sputum interleukin-8. Chest. 2001;119:1329–1336
  89. Anticevich SZ, Hughes JM, Black JL, Armour CL. Induction of hyperresponsiveness in human airway tissue by neutrophils—mechanism of action. Clin Exp Allergy. 1996;26:549–556
  90. Fernandes DJ, Mitchell RW, Lakser O, Dowell M, Stewart AG, Solway J. Do inflammatory mediators influence the contribution of airway smooth muscle contraction to airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma?. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:844–853
  91. Ammit AJ, Armour CL, Black JL. Smooth-muscle myosin light chain kinase content is increased in human sensitized airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:257–263
  92. Page S, Ammit AJ, Black JL, Armour CL. Human mast cells and airway smooth muscle cell interactions: implications for asthma. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001;281:L1313–L1323
  93. Bradding P, Walls AF, Holgate ST. The role of the mast cell in the pathophysiology of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:1277–1284
  94. Carroll NG, Mutavdzic S, James AL. Increased mast cells and neutrophils in submucosal mucous glands and mucus plugging in patients with asthma. Thorax. 2002;57:677–682
  95. Dahlén S-E, Kumlin M. Monitoring mast cell activation by prostaglandin D2 in vivo. Thorax. 2004;59:453–455
  96. Ammit AJ, Bekir SS, Johnson PR, Hughes JM, Armour CL, Black JL. Mast cell numbers are increased in the smooth muscle of human sensitized isolated bronchi. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:1123–1129
  97. Brightling CE, Bradding P, Symon FA, Holgate ST, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Mast-cell infiltration of airway smooth muscle in asthma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1699–1705
  98. Anticevich SZ, Hughes JM, Black JL, Armour CL. Induction of human airway hyperresponsiveness by tumor necrosis factor. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;284:222–225
  99. Johnson PRA, Ammit AJ, Carlin SM, Armour CL, Black JL. Mast cell tryptase potentiates histamine induced contraction in human sensitised bronchi. Eur Respir J. 1996;10:38–43
  100. Watson N, Ruhlmann E, Magnussen H, Rabe KF. Histamine hypersensitivity induced by passive sensitization of human bronchus: effect of serum IgE depletion. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998;28:679–685
  101. Schmidt D, Ruehlmann E, Branscheid D, Magnussen H, Rabe KF. Passive sensitization of human airway increases responsiveness to leukotriene C4. Eur Respir J. 1999;14:315–319
  102. Kanazawa H, Asai K, Hirata K, Yoshikawa J. Vascular involvement in exercise-induced airway narrowing in patients with bronchial asthma. Chest. 2002;122:166–170
  103. Van Rensen ELJ, Hiemstra PS, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ. Assessment of microvascular leakage via sputum induction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1275–1279
  104. Kanazawa H, Hirata K, Yoshikawa J. Involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor in exercise induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients. Thorax. 2002;57:885–888
  105. Kanazawa H, Tochino Y, Asai K. Angiopoietin-2 as a contributing factor of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:390–395
  106. Kanazawa H, Nomura S, Asai K. Roles of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 on airway microvascular permeability in asthmatic patients. Chest. 2007;131:1035–1041
  107. Hermans C, Bernard A. Pneumoproteinaemia: a new perspective in the assessment of lung disorders. Eur Respir J. 1998;11:801–803
  108. Nanson CJ, Burgess JL, Robin M, Bernard AM. Exercise alters serum pneumoprotein concentrations. Respir Physiol. 2001;127:259–265
  109. Carbonnelle S, Francaux M, Doyle I, Dumont X, de Burbure C, Morel G, et al. Changes in serum pneumoproteins caused by short-term exposures to nitrogen trichloride in indoor chlorinated swimming pools. Biomarkers. 2002;7:464–478
  110. Broeckaert F, Arsalane K, Hermans C, Bergamaschi E, Brustolin A, Mutti A, et al. Serum Clara cell protein: a sensitive biomarker of increased lung epithelium permeability caused by ambient ozone. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:533–537
  111. Lakind JS, Holgate ST, Ownby DR, Mansur AH, Helms PJ, Pyatt D, et al. A critical review of the use of Clara cell secretory protein (CC16) as a biomarker of acute or chronic pulmonary effects. Biomarkers. 2007;12:445–467
  112. Bernard A, Carbonnelle S, Michel O, Higuet S, De Burbure C, Buchet JP, et al. Lung hyperpermeability and asthma prevalence in schoolchildren: unexpected associations with the attendance at indoor chlorinated swimming pools. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:385–394
  113. Bernard A, Carbonnelle S, Nickmilder M, de Burbure C. Non-invasive biomarkers of pulmonary damage and inflammation: Application to children exposed to ozone and trichloramine. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;206:185–190
  114. Bernard A, Carbonnelle S, de Burbure C, Michel O, Nickmilder M. Chlorinated pool attendance, atopy, and the risk of asthma during childhood. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1567–1573
  115. Bernard A, Carbonnelle S, Dumont X, Nickmilder M. Infant swimming practice, pulmonary epithelium integrity, and the risk of allergic and respiratory diseases later in childhood. Pediatrics. 2007;119:1095–1103
  116. Freed AN, Taskar V, Schofield B, Omori C. Hyperventilation-induced airway injury and vascular leakage in dogs: effects of alpha1-adrenergic agonists. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83:1884–1889
  117. Persson CG, Erjefalt JS, Alkner U, Baumgarten CM, Greiff L, Gistafsson B, et al. Plasma exudation as a first line respiratory mucosal defence. Clin Exp Allergy. 1991;21:17–24
  118. Persson CG, Andersson M, Uller L. Epithelial Repair and Function. In:  Proud D editors. The pulmonary epithelium. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008;
  119. Kanazawa H. Microvascular theory of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma: potential implication of vascular endothelial growth factor. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2007;6:133–137
  120. Anderson SD, Daviskas E. The airway microvasculature and exercise-induced asthma. Thorax. 1992;47:748–752
  121. Naline E, Devillier P, Drapeau G, Toty L, Bakdach H, Regoli D, et al. Characterization of neurokinin effects and receptor selectivity in human isolated bronchi. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140:679–686
  122. Frossard N, Rhoden KJ, Barnes PJ. Influence of epithelium on guinea pig airway responses to tachykinins: role of endopeptidase and cyclooxygenase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989;248:292–298
  123. Joos GF, Vincken W, Louis R, Schelfhout VJ, Wang JH, Shaw MJ, et al. Dual tachykinin NK1/NK2 antagonist DNK333 inhibits neurokinin A-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma patients. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:76–81
  124. Solway J, Leff AR. Sensory neuropeptides and airway function. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71:2077–2087
  125. Nagase T, Ohga E, Katayama H, Sudo E, Aoki T, Matsuse T, et al. Roles of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in hyperpnea-induced constriction in guinea pigs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1551–1556
  126. Crimi N, Mastruzzo C, Pagano C, Lisitano N, Palermo F, Vancheri C. Montelukast protects against bradykinin-induced bronchospasm. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115:870–872
  127. Hallstrand TS, Chi EY, Singer AG, Gelb MH, Henderson WR. Secreted phospholipase A2 group X overexpression in asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:1072–1078
  128. Hilberg T. Etiology of exercise-induced asthma: physical stress-induced transcription. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007;7:27–32
  129. Mickleborough TD, Lindley MR, Ionescu AA, Fly AD. Protective effect of fish oil supplementation on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. Chest. 2006;129:39–49
  130. Kemp JP, Dockhorn RJ, Shapiro GG, Nguyen HH, Reiss TF, Seidenberg BC, et al. Montelukast once daily inhibits exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma. J Pediatr. 1998;133:424–428
  131. Baki A, Orhan F. The effect of loratadine in exercise-induced asthma. Arch Dis Child. 2002;86:38–39
  132. Coreno A, Skowronski M, Kotaur C, McFadden ER. Comparative effects of long-acting β2-agonists, leukotriene antagonists, and a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor on exercise-induced asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:500–506
  133. Fischer AR, McFadden CA, Frantz R, Awni WM, Cohn J, Drazen JM, et al. Effect of chronic 5-lipozygenase inhibition on airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1203–1207
  134. Gulliksson M, Brunnstrom A, Johannesson M, Backman L, Nilsson G, Harvima I, et al. Expression of 15-lipoxygenase type-1 in human mast cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1771:1156–1165
  135. Hwang SW, Cho H, Kwak J, Lee SY, Kang CJ, Jung J, et al. Direct activation of capsaicin receptors by products of lipoxygenases: endogenous capsaicin-like substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6155–6160
  136. Banner AS, Green J, O'Connor M. Relation of respiratory water loss to coughing after exercise. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:883–886
  137. van der Woude HJ, Winter TH, Aalbers R. Decreased bronchodilating effect of salbutamol in relieving methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction during high dose treatment with long action β2 agonists. Thorax. 2001;56:529–535
  138. Anderson SD, Fitch K, Perry CP, Sue-Chu M, Crapo R, McKenzie D, et al. Responses to bronchial challenge submitted for approval to use inhaled beta2 agonists prior to an event at the 2002 Winter Olympics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:44–49
  139. Anderson SD, Brannan JD. Long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists and exercise-induced asthma: lessons to guide us in the future. Paediatr Drugs. 2004;6:161–175
  140. Storms W, Chervinsky P, Ghannam AF, Bird S, Hustad CM, Edelman JM. A comparison of the effects of oral montelukast and inhaled salmeterol on response to rescue bronchodilation after challenge. Respir Med. 2004;98:1051–1062
  141. Anderson SD, Caillaud C, Brannan JD. β2-agonists and exercise-induced asthma. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006;31:163–180
  142. Anderson SD, Sue-Chu M, Perry CP, Gratziou C, Kippelen P, McKenzie DC, et al. Bronchial challenges in athletes applying to inhale a β2-agonist at the 2004 summer Olympics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:767–773
  143. Weinberger M, Abu-Hasan M. Life-threatening asthma during treatment with salmeterol. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:852–853
  144. Kay LJ, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Suvarna SK, Peachell PT. Influence of beta2-adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms on beta2-adrenoceptor-mediated responses in human lung mast cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;152:323–331
  145. Hancox RJ, Subbarao P, Kamada D, Watson RM, Hargreave FE, Inman MD. Beta2-agonist tolerance and exercise-induced bronchospasm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1068–1070
  146. Haney S, Hancox RJ. Rapid onset of tolerance to beta-agonist bronchodilation. Respir Med. 2005;99:566–571
  147. Davis BE, Reid JK, Cockcroft DW. Formoterol thrice weekly does not result in the development of tolerance to bronchoprotection. Can Respir J. 2003;10:23–26
  148. Johnson M. Molecular mechanisms of β2 adrenergic receptor function, response and regulation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:18–24
  149. Baluk P, McDonald DM. The beta 2-adrenergic receptor agonist formoterol reduces microvascular leakage by inhibiting endothelial gap formation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 1994;266:L461–L468
  150. Chetta A, Zanini A, Olivieri D. Therapeutic approach to vascular remodelling in asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2007;20:1–8
  151. Omori C, Schofield BH, Mitzner W, Freed AN. A β2-adrenergic agonist inhibits dry air-induced injury in canine peripheral airways. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:2169–2179
  152. Greiff L, Wollmer P, Andersson M, Svensson C, Persson CG. Effects of formoterol on histamine induced plasma exudation in induced sputum from normal subjects. Thorax. 1998;53:1010–1013
  153. Haney S, Hancox RJ. Recovery from bronchoconstriction and bronchodilator tolerance. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006;31:181–196
  154. Cockcroft DW. Inhaled β2-agonists and airway responses to allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102(suppl):S96–S99
  155. Swystun VA, Gordon JR, Davis EB, Zhand X, Cockcroft DW. Mast cell tryptase release and asthmatic responses to allergen increase with regular use of salbutamol. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:57–64
  156. Evans DW, Salome CM, King GG, Rimmer SJ, Seale JP, Woolcock AJ. Effect of regular inhaled salbutamol on airway responsiveness and airway inflammation in rhinitic non-asthmatic subjects. Thorax. 1997;52:136–142
  157. Gauvreau GM, Jordana M, Watson RM, Cockcroft DW, O'Byrne PM. Effect of regular inhaled albuterol on allergen induced late responses and sputum eosinophils in asthmatic subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:1738–1745
  158. Mak JCW, Roffel F, Katsunuma T, Elzinga CRS, Zaagsma J, Barnes PJ. Up-regulation of airway smooth muscle histamine H1 receptor mRNA, protein, and function by beta 2-adrenoceptor activation. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;57:857–864
  159. McGraw DW, Almoosa KF, Paul RJ, Kobilka BK, Liggett SB. Antithetic regulation by beta-adrenergic receptors of Gq receptor signaling via phospholipase C underlies the airway beta-agonist paradox. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:619–626
  160. McGraw DW, Liggett SB. Molecular mechanisms of beta2-adrenergic receptor function and regulation. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005;2:292–296discussion 311-2
  161. Anderson GP. Current issues with β2-adrenoceptor agonists: pharmacology and molecular and cellular mechanisms. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006;31:119–130
  162. McGraw DW, Elwing JM, Fogel KM, Wang WCH, Glinka CB, Muihlbachler KA, et al. Cross talk between Gi and Gq/Gs pathways in airway smooth muscle regulates bronchial contractility and relaxation. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1391–1398

 Series editors: Donald Y. M. Leung, MD, PhD, and Dennis K. Ledford, MD

 Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

PII: S0091-6749(08)00785-9

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.001

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 122, Issue 2 , Pages 225-235, August 2008