Volume 121, Issue 5 , Pages 1210-1218.e4, May 2008
The prevalence of plant food allergies: A systematic review
Background
There is uncertainty regarding the prevalence of allergies to plant food.
Objective
To assess the prevalence of allergies to plant food according to the different subjective and objective assessment methods.
Methods
Our systematic search of population-based studies (since 1990) in the literature database MEDLINE focused on fruits, vegetables/legumes, tree nuts, wheat, soy, cereals, and seeds. Prevalence estimates were categorized by food item and method used (food challenges, skin prick test, serum IgE, parent/self-reported symptoms), complemented by appropriate meta-analyses.
Results
We included 36 studies with data from a total of over 250,000 children and adults. Only 6 studies included food challenge tests with prevalences ranging from 0.1% to 4.3% each for fruits and tree nuts, 0.1% to 1.4% for vegetables, and <1% each for wheat, soy, and sesame. The prevalence of sensitization against any specific plant food item assessed by skin prick test was usually <1%, whereas sensitization assessed by IgE against wheat ranged as high as 3.6% and against soy as high as 2.9%. For fruit and vegetables, prevalences based on perception were generally higher than those based on sensitization, but for wheat and soy in adults, sensitization was higher. Meta-analyses showed significant heterogeneity between studies regardless of food item or age group.
Conclusion
Population-based prevalence estimates for allergies to plant products determined by the diagnostic gold standard are scarce. There was considerable heterogeneity in the prevalence estimates of sensitization or perceived allergic reactions to plant food.
Key words: Cereal, EuroPrevall, food allergy, food hypersensitivity, fruit, meta-analysis, nuts, prevalence, seeds, soy, vegetables, wheat
Abbreviations used: DBPCFC, Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, FA, Food allergy, MeSH, Medical Subject Heading, SPT, Skin prick test
The authors met and discussed the paper within the framework of EuroPrevall, an Integrated Project funded by the European Commission (FOOD-CT-2005-514000). L.Z. was funded by the European Union through the EuroPrevall project (FOOD-CT-2005-514000).
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: J. Dahlstrom is employed by Phadia AB. E. Sodergren is employed by Phadia AB. R. J. Rona was Ad Honorem advisor to the International Life Science Institute. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(08)00406-5
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.019
© 2008 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 121, Issue 5 , Pages 1210-1218.e4, May 2008
