Volume 120, Issue 5 , Pages 1043-1050, November 2007
Comparative study of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast in young children with mild persistent asthma
Background
Budesonide inhalation suspension and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast have demonstrated efficacy in children with mild persistent asthma, but comparative long-term studies in young children are needed.
Objective
To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation suspension and montelukast.
Methods
After a run-in period, children 2 to 8 years old with mild asthma or recurrent wheezing were randomized to once-daily budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 mg or once-daily oral montelukast 4 or 5 mg for 52 weeks. Subjects were stepped up to twice-daily budesonide inhalation suspension or oral corticosteroids for mild or severe asthma worsening, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first additional medication for asthma worsening at 52 weeks. Secondary variables included times to the first additional asthma medication measured at 12 and 26 weeks; times to the first asthma exacerbation (mild and severe) measured at 12, 26, and 52 weeks; exacerbation rates (mild and severe) over a period of 52 weeks; diary variables (eg, peak expiratory flow [PEF]); patient-reported outcomes; and Global Physician and Caregiver Assessments.
Results
No significant between-group differences were observed for time to first additional asthma medication at 52 weeks; however, time to first additional asthma medication was longer (unadjusted P = .050) at 12 weeks and exacerbation rates were lower over a period of 52 weeks (unadjusted P = .034) for budesonide versus montelukast. Time to first severe exacerbation (requiring oral corticosteroids) was similar in both groups, but the percentage of subjects requiring oral corticosteroids over a period of 52 weeks was lower with budesonide (25.5% vs 32.0%). Peak flow and Caregiver and Physician Global Assessments favored budesonide.
Conclusion
Both treatments provided acceptable asthma control; however, overall measures favored budesonide inhalation suspension over montelukast.
Clinical implications
These findings are consistent with studies in older children demonstrating better outcomes with inhaled corticosteroids versus montelukast.
Key words: Budesonide inhalation suspension, montelukast, asthma, pediatric, efficacy, safety
Abbreviations used: AE, Adverse event, BIS, Budesonide inhalation suspension, CHQ-PF50, Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form-50, CSHA, Children's Health Survey for Asthma, FVC, Forced vital capacity, ICS, Inhaled corticosteroid, LTRA, Leukotriene receptor antagonist, NAEPP, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, PACQLQ, Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire, PEF, Peak expiratory flow, SABA, Short-acting β2-adrenergic agonist
Supported by AstraZeneca LP.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: S. J. Szefler has consulting arrangements with AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis, Genentech, and Merck and has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Ross Pharmaceuticals. J. W. Baker has received grant support from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Apieron, NIOXX, Sanofi-Aventis, Amgen, ALK, Altana, MedPointe, Centocor, IVAX, JNJ, and Wyeth and is on the speakers' bureau for AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Merck. T. Uryniak, M. Goldman, and P. E. Silkoff own stock in and are employed by AstraZeneca.
PII: S0091-6749(07)01726-5
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.063
© 2007 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 120, Issue 5 , Pages 1043-1050, November 2007
