« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 120, Issue 6
, Pages
1382-1388
, December 2007
Impaired immune response to vaccinia virus inoculated at the site of cutaneous allergic inflammation
-
A, EC sensitization and VV infection protocol. B and C, Skin infiltration with CD4+ T cells and eosinophils and expression of TH2 and TH1 cytokines at the time of VV inoculation. D, Representative sat
A, EC sensitization and VV infection protocol. B and C, Skin infiltration with CD4+ T cells and eosinophils and expression of TH2 and TH1 cytokines at the time of VV inoculation. D, Representative satellite skin lesion. E, Satellite lesions in mice inoculated with VV at OVA versus saline-sensitized sites. ∗P < .05. HPF, High-power field; Eos, eosinophils; SAL, saline; ns, not significant.
-
Expression of CRAMP (A), IFN-α (B), and IFN-γ (C) mRNA in EC sensitized skin before and VV infection at the sensitization site. ∗P < .05. SAL, Saline.Expression of CRAMP (A), IFN-α (B), and IFN-γ (C) mRNA in EC sensitized skin before and VV infection at the sensitization site. ∗P < .05. SAL, Saline.
Supported by federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract number HHSN266200400030C (Atopic Dermatitis Vaccinia Network).
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: J. Scott has consulting arrangements with Alicare Medical Management, owns Pharmaceutical holder trust stock, and is on the speakers' bureau for Verus Pharmaceuticals. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(07)01457-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.004
© 2007 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 120, Issue 6
, Pages
1382-1388
, December 2007
