The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 121, Issue 1 , Pages 81-87, January 2008

An economic analysis of aspirin desensitization in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

  • Marcus Shaker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
    • Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Hanover, NH
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Marcus S. Shaker, MD, Department of Pediatrics and Community and Family Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756.
  • ,
  • Ano Lobb, BA

      Affiliations

    • Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Hanover, NH
  • ,
  • Pamela Jenkins, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
  • ,
  • Daniel O'Rourke, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
  • ,
  • Steve K. Takemoto, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Saint Louis University Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
  • ,
  • Salil Sheth, MHA

      Affiliations

    • Saint Louis University Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
  • ,
  • Thomas Burroughs, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Saint Louis University Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
  • ,
  • Mark S. Dykewicz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Division of Immunobiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo

Received 11 December 2006; received in revised form 22 June 2007; accepted 26 June 2007. published online 23 August 2007.

Background

Aspirin desensitization is an effective therapy for moderate-to-severe aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Desensitization also allows the use of aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention.

Objective

We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of aspirin desensitization with subsequent aspirin therapy in patients with AERD.

Methods

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used, together with average reimbursements from a large Midwestern health care plan, to model the costs of aspirin desensitization for therapeutic and prophylactic use in patients with AERD. Event probabilities were based on the published literature.

Results

Ambulatory desensitization for AERD cost $6768 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved ($18.54 per additional symptom-free day). Aspirin desensitization for AERD remained cost-effective (<$50,000 per QALY saved) across a wide range of assumptions. When secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis was considered, ambulatory aspirin desensitization was less expensive than an alternative antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel. Clopidogrel cost $106,453 per incremental QALY saved when compared with desensitization.

Conclusions

Aspirin desensitization is a cost-effective therapeutic intervention in patients with moderate-to-severe AERD. Although the incremental cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in individuals with aspirin allergy is marginal, if available, ambulatory desensitization remains a less-expensive option for secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis.

Key words: Cost-effectiveness analysis, quality-adjusted life year, aspirin desensitization, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

Abbreviations used: AERD, Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, CPT, Current procedural terminology, ICD-9, Internation Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, ICER, Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, NSAID, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, QALY, Quality-adjusted life year

 

 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: S. K. Takemoto has consulting arrangements with, has received grant support from, and is on the speakers' bureau for Novartis and Astellas. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

PII: S0091-6749(07)01386-3

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.047

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 121, Issue 1 , Pages 81-87, January 2008