The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 119, Issue 6 , Pages 1470-1480 , June 2007

Chemokine responses distinguish chemical-induced allergic from irritant skin inflammation: Memory T cells make the difference

  • Stephan Meller, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Antti I. Lauerma, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Control of Hypersensitivity Diseases, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Frank Michael Kopp, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Environmental Research, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Franziska Winterberg, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Minna Anthoni, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Control of Hypersensitivity Diseases, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki
  • ,
  • Anja Müller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf
  • ,
  • Michael Gombert, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
  • ,
  • Anna Haahtela, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • ,
  • Harri Alenius, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre of Excellence in Immunotoxicology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki
  • ,
  • Juliane Rieker, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
  • ,
  • Marie-Caroline Dieu-Nosjean, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 255, Laboratoire d'Immunologie Cellulaire et Clinique, Centre de Recherches Biomédicales des Cordeliers, Paris
  • ,
  • Robert Christof Kubitza

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
  • ,
  • Ernst Gleichmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Environmental Research, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf
  • ,
  • Thomas Ruzicka, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
  • ,
  • Albert Zlotnik, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Neurocrine Bioscience, San Diego
  • ,
  • Bernhard Homey, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Bernhard Homey, MD, Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Received 9 August 2006 ,Revised 22 November 2006 ,Accepted 12 December 2006.

  • Image Result

    CXCL9 and CXCL10 are selectively upregulated in hapten-specific but not in irritant contact dermatitis. A, Ear-swelling responses (mm × 10−2) after epicutaneous application of either vehicle, the stan

    CXCL9 and CXCL10 are selectively upregulated in hapten-specific but not in irritant contact dermatitis. A, Ear-swelling responses (mm × 10−2) after epicutaneous application of either vehicle, the standard irritant croton oil or the hapten DNFB. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CXCL9 (B), CXCL10 (C), and CCL20 (D) at indicated time points in epidermal sheets. E, Ear-swelling responses (mm × 10−2) of nickel-sensitized mice 48 hours after intradermal challenge with NiCl2 or saline. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CXCL9 (F) and CXCL10 (G) in epidermal sheets of nickel-specific allergic contact dermatitis and controls. Values are expressed as femtograms of target gene in 12.5 ng of total cDNA.

  • Image Result
    Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CXCL9 (A), CXCL10 (B), CXCL11 (C), and CCL20 (D) expression in skin specimens obtained from NiSO4 and SLS patch tests of nickel-sensitized patients (n = 8) at 0,

    Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CXCL9 (A), CXCL10 (B), CXCL11 (C), and CCL20 (D) expression in skin specimens obtained from NiSO4 and SLS patch tests of nickel-sensitized patients (n = 8) at 0, 2, 6, and 48 hours after chemical exposure, respectively. Values are expressed as femtograms of target gene in 25 ng of total cDNA.

  • Image Result
    Shrunken centroids ranking chemokine expression in human skin specimens of NiSO4 or SLS patch tests of Ni-sensitized patients (n = 8). Horizontal values represent log ratios of gene expression.

    Shrunken centroids ranking chemokine expression in human skin specimens of NiSO4 or SLS patch tests of Ni-sensitized patients (n = 8). Horizontal values represent log ratios of gene expression.

  • Image Result
    Immunhistochemical evaluation of CXCL9 (A-F), CXCL10 (G-L), and CXCL12 (M-R) expression in human skin specimens of NiSO4 patch tests versus SLS patch tests.

    Immunhistochemical evaluation of CXCL9 (A-F), CXCL10 (G-L), and CXCL12 (M-R) expression in human skin specimens of NiSO4 patch tests versus SLS patch tests.

  • Image Result
    Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 , and CCL20 expression in resting and activated structural cells of the skin (A-D: representative results from single donors) as well as La

    Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 , and CCL20 expression in resting and activated structural cells of the skin (A-D: representative results from single donors) as well as Langerhans-type and interstitial-type dendritic cells (E-H; mean + SD of 2 independent donors). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of CD25 (I) and IFN-γ (J) expression in DNP-specific human T-cell clones stimulated with PHA or with their relevant antigen DNP. Results are representative of 2 individual experiments with 2 different donors. Values are expressed as femtograms of target gene in 12.5 ng of total cDNA.

  • Image Result
    Migratory response toward CXCL10 of CD4+CLA+ T cells (A) or CD8+CLA+ T cells (B) in the presence or absence of a suboptimal dose of CXCL12 (10 ng/mL). Dose response of CD4+CLA+ T cells (C) or CD8+CLA+

    Migratory response toward CXCL10 of CD4+CLA+ T cells (A) or CD8+CLA+ T cells (B) in the presence or absence of a suboptimal dose of CXCL12 (10 ng/mL). Dose response of CD4+CLA+ T cells (C) or CD8+CLA+ T cells (D) to CCL27 in the presence or absence of a suboptimal dose of CXCL12 (10 ng/mL). Migratory response of CD4+CLA+ T cells (E) or CD8+CLA+ T cells (F) to a suboptimal dose of CXCL12 after priming with CXCL10. Results of triplicate experiments are shown. G, Ear-swelling responses after adoptive transfer of spleen and lymph node cells from DNFB-sensitized mice. Before adoptive transfer cells were exposed to 1 μg/mL CXCL10 or saline. Ear-swelling response was measured 24, 48, and 72 hours after adoptive transfer. For statistical analysis, a Student t test was performed. ∗P < .05; ∗∗∗P < .005.

 Supported by Contract QLK4-CT-2001-00366 Chemokine-Atopy from the European Commission (to A.I.L., B.H., H.A.) and by Grant SFB503/C9 from the German Research Foundation (to B.H.).Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: The authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

PII: S0091-6749(07)00115-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.654

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 119, Issue 6 , Pages 1470-1480 , June 2007