The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 117, Issue 2 , Pages 259-262 , February 2006

Nitric oxide as a clinical guide for asthma management

  • D. Robin Taylor, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: D. Robin Taylor, MD, FRCPC, Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Received 1 November 2005 ,Revised 7 November 2005 ,Accepted 7 November 2005.

  • Image Result

    Changes in FEV1 (% improvement) following 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone 500 μg/d in 52 subjects with chronic nonspecific respiratory symptoms, stratified by baseline FENO (tertiles). T

    Changes in FEV1 (% improvement) following 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone 500 μg/d in 52 subjects with chronic nonspecific respiratory symptoms, stratified by baseline FENO (tertiles). The changes in FEV1 were significantly higher in the group with the highest FENO (greater than 47 ppb) using 1-way ANOVA for trends across all 3 groups (P < .01). Data are also given after stratifying by clinical diagnosis made at the time of initial presentation based on symptoms, bronchodilator response, and/or a positive test for airway hyperresponsiveness (asthma versus nonasthma).7

  • Image Result
    Distribution of mean inhaled fluticasone doses (over 12 months) in 2 asthma management groups, one using FENO measurements (n = 46) and the other conventional group in which symptoms, bronchodilator u

    Distribution of mean inhaled fluticasone doses (over 12 months) in 2 asthma management groups, one using FENO measurements (n = 46) and the other conventional group in which symptoms, bronchodilator use, and lung function were used in accordance with a priori criteria (n = 48). There was a highly significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .008). Downward dose adjustments were made in the FENO group if the FENO level was less than 35 ppb.14

 Guest editors: William W. Busse, MD, and Stanley J. Szefler, MD

 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: D. Taylor has received money and has spoken on behalf of Aerocrine.

PII: S0091-6749(05)02524-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.11.010

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 117, Issue 2 , Pages 259-262 , February 2006