« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 116, Issue 6
, Pages
1275-1281
, December 2005
Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis
-
Change in bilateral polyp grade score from baseline to the endpoint. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANCOVA, with treatment, baseline asthma status, site effects, and base
Change in bilateral polyp grade score from baseline to the endpoint. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANCOVA, with treatment, baseline asthma status, site effects, and baseline bilateral polyp grade score. Endpoint was defined as the last nonmissing reading for the subject. Baseline bilateral polyp grade scores were 4.21, 4.27, and 4.25 in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.
-
Change from baseline in congestion/obstruction score during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site efChange from baseline in congestion/obstruction score during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline congestion/obstruction scores were 2.29, 2.35, and 2.28 in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.
-
Change from baseline in individual symptom scores (loss of smell, anterior rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) at month 1 of treatment (A) and month 4 of treatment (B). LS means and pairwise comparison PChange from baseline in individual symptom scores (loss of smell, anterior rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) at month 1 of treatment (A) and month 4 of treatment (B). LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline individual symptom scores were 2.27, 2.14, and 2.32 for loss of smell, 1.66, 1.62, and 1.58 for anterior rhinorrhea, and 1.55, 1.43, and 1.48 for postnasal drip in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.
-
Change from baseline in PNIF during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline PNIF ratChange from baseline in PNIF during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline PNIF rates were 87.6 L/min, 92.7 L/min, and 83.9 L/min in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.
Supported by a grant from the Schering-Plough Research Institute.Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: Dr Small received research support from PO 1998 SAR Study, PO 1925 Polyp Study, PO 2573 Follow-Up to Polyp Study, PO 2683 Acute Rhinosinusitis, and PO 2692 Acute Rhinosinusitis. Dr Stryszak, Dr Staudinger, and Dr Danzig are employed by Schering-Plough. Dr Schenkel has consultant arrangements with Schering-Plough and Sanofi-Aventis; receives research support from Schering-Plough, Sanofi-Aventis, and Glaxo; and is on the speakers bureau for Schering-Plough, Sanofi-Aventis, and Glaxo. All other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
PII: S0091-6749(05)01712-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.07.027
© 2005 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 116, Issue 6
, Pages
1275-1281
, December 2005
