The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 116, Issue 6 , Pages 1275-1281 , December 2005

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis

  • Catherine Butkus Small, MD

      Affiliations

    • From Division of Infectious Diseases, New York Medical College
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Catherine Butkus Small, MD, Division of Infectious Diseases, Munger Pavilion Rm. 245, Valhalla, NY 10595.
  • ,
  • Jaime Hernandez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Medellin Clinic
  • ,
  • Antonio Reyes, MD

      Affiliations

    • Otorrinolaringologo, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali
  • ,
  • Eric Schenkel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia
  • ,
  • Angela Damiano, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Otolaryngology, New York Medical College
  • ,
  • Paul Stryszak, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth
  • ,
  • Heribert Staudinger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth
  • ,
  • Melvyn Danzig, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth

Received 1 April 2005 ,Revised 28 June 2005 ,Accepted 5 July 2005.

  • Image Result

    Change in bilateral polyp grade score from baseline to the endpoint. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANCOVA, with treatment, baseline asthma status, site effects, and base

    Change in bilateral polyp grade score from baseline to the endpoint. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANCOVA, with treatment, baseline asthma status, site effects, and baseline bilateral polyp grade score. Endpoint was defined as the last nonmissing reading for the subject. Baseline bilateral polyp grade scores were 4.21, 4.27, and 4.25 in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Change from baseline in congestion/obstruction score during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site ef

    Change from baseline in congestion/obstruction score during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline congestion/obstruction scores were 2.29, 2.35, and 2.28 in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Change from baseline in individual symptom scores (loss of smell, anterior rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) at month 1 of treatment (A) and month 4 of treatment (B). LS means and pairwise comparison P

    Change from baseline in individual symptom scores (loss of smell, anterior rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) at month 1 of treatment (A) and month 4 of treatment (B). LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline individual symptom scores were 2.27, 2.14, and 2.32 for loss of smell, 1.66, 1.62, and 1.58 for anterior rhinorrhea, and 1.55, 1.43, and 1.48 for postnasal drip in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Change from baseline in PNIF during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline PNIF rat

    Change from baseline in PNIF during the treatment period. LS means and pairwise comparison P values were obtained from ANOVA with treatment, baseline asthma status, and site effects. Baseline PNIF rates were 87.6 L/min, 92.7 L/min, and 83.9 L/min in the MFNS 200 μg QD, MFNS 200 μg BID, and placebo groups, respectively.

 Supported by a grant from the Schering-Plough Research Institute.Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: Dr Small received research support from PO 1998 SAR Study, PO 1925 Polyp Study, PO 2573 Follow-Up to Polyp Study, PO 2683 Acute Rhinosinusitis, and PO 2692 Acute Rhinosinusitis. Dr Stryszak, Dr Staudinger, and Dr Danzig are employed by Schering-Plough. Dr Schenkel has consultant arrangements with Schering-Plough and Sanofi-Aventis; receives research support from Schering-Plough, Sanofi-Aventis, and Glaxo; and is on the speakers bureau for Schering-Plough, Sanofi-Aventis, and Glaxo. All other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

PII: S0091-6749(05)01712-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.07.027

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 116, Issue 6 , Pages 1275-1281 , December 2005