Journal Home
Search for

Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages 1089-1090 (May 2005)


View previous. 56 of 67 View next.

COX-2–selective inhibitor valdecoxib induces severe allergic skin reactions

Carolina Talhari, MD, Ingrida Lauceviciute, MD, Elaine Enderlein, MD, Thomas Ruzicka, MD, Bernhard Homey, MD

Article Outline

References

Copyright

To the Editor:

Since the 1960s, when the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were launched into the market, several adverse events have been reported,1 including skin eruptions mostly caused by nonimmunological rather than allergic mechanisms.2, 3 NSAIDs exert their analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, and antithrombotic effects by inhibiting both COX-1 and COX-2 activities.4, 5, 6 However, the primary responsibility for the synthesis of prostanoids involved in acute and chronic inflammatory states has been credited to COX-2, whereas the gastrointestinal adverse effects have been attributed to COX-1 activity.1, 6 The consequent hypothesis that specific inhibition of this enzyme could have therapeutic effects similar to those of other NSAIDs but without causing gastrointestinal side effects led to the development of COX-2–selective antagonists. Valdecoxib (Bextra, Pfizer, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) is one of these new drugs. In the last few years, it has been increasingly prescribed for the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, primary dysmenorrhea, and moderate to severe postoperative pain.7

COX-2–specific inhibitors have an alleged safer profile compared with other nonselective NSAIDs.4, 5, 6 However, several adverse events caused by selective COX-2 inhibitors have been described.8, 9 We report here a case of severe hypersensitivity skin reaction caused by valdecoxib.

A 58-year-old man presented with a 2-day history of exanthem, malaise, and fever. For the treatment of arthralgy, the patient had been taking a daily dose of 20 mg valdecoxib for 6 days before the onset of skin lesions. No previous history of skin reactions to other NSAIDs or sulfonamides was reported. On admission, physical examination showed a generalized confluent maculopapular exanthem without mucous membrane involvement (Fig 1, A).


View full-size image.

Fig 1. Severe allergic skin reactions to valdecoxib. A, A 58-year-old patient with a generalized maculopapular exanthem induced by valdecoxib. B, Severe and spreading skin reaction 48 hours after scratch testing with valdecoxib. C, Skin reaction (+++) day 2 after epicutaneous patch testing with valdecoxib (at a concentration of 10% in the upper reaction and 1% in the reaction below).


Routine blood examination revealed leukocytosis and increased values of creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, C-reactive protein, and eosinophil cationic protein. Serological tests for adenovirus, echovirus, coxsackie, measles, and hepatitis virus were negative, and antibodies to rubella and Epstein-Barr virus showed signs of previous infection. Ultrasonography revealed enlargement of lymph nodes caused by local inflammation. After discontinuation of valdecoxib and treatment with systemic glucocorticosteroids, antihistamines, and local glucocorticosteroids, the exanthem disappeared.

Histopathological examination of a skin biopsy revealed slight spongiosis of the epidermis and a perivascular inflammatory infiltrate consisting mostly of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and few eosinophils.

Skin prick tests with seasonal and perennial airborne allergens as well as standard food allergens were uniformly negative. Scratch tests performed with nonspecific NSAIDs (acetylsalicylic acid, metamizol, paracetamol, diclofenac, indometacin, ibuprofen) as well as the COX-2–selective inhibitors celecoxib and valdecoxib showed no skin reactions after 20 minutes. However, 24 hours later, a severe erythematous and edematous skin lesion occurred, spreading over the forearm where scratch tests had been performed (Fig 1, B). Notably, subsequent scratch tests with acetylsalicylic acid, metamizol, paracetamol, diclofenac, indometacin, ibuprofen, and celecoxib, but without valdecoxib, were uniformly negative at 20 minutes as well as 24 hours after exposure. In epicutaneous patch testing with standard allergens and Bextra, the tests with benzalkonium chloride and cetalkonium chloride were+(according to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria),10 and in the test with Bextra, a +++ delayed-type skin reaction with a peak response on day 3 developed. In addition, patch testing with single components of Bextra revealed +++ skin reactions to the pure active substance valdecoxib (1% and 10% in acqua) with peak responses on days 2 and 3 (Fig 1, C). To exclude valdecoxib-induced irritant responses, healthy individuals (n=4) were patch-tested with valdecoxib (1%, 10%) and demonstrated no skin reactions.

Nonimmunological hypersensitivity reaction to nonspecific NSAIDs is a well-known and frequent cause of skin reactions. An increasing number of studies suggest that the COX-2–selective antagonists can be safely taken by patients who develop cutaneous reactions caused by nonselective NSAIDs.3, 4, 6 However, here we report that the COX-2–selective inhibitor valdecoxib may induce severe allergic skin reactions.

Because valdecoxib and celecoxib have an analogous chemical structure,7, 8 one could expect a cross-reaction between these 2 drugs. However, in previous reports showing allergic skin reactions to celecoxib, tests with other specific COX-2 inhibitors were either negative8 or not mentioned.5 A scratch test with celecoxib demonstrated no reaction in our patient. Although these findings suggest that a cross-reaction is unlikely, further studies are necessary to confirm this.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of valdecoxib-induced skin allergy confirmed by a positive patch test. The presented case shows that the COX-2–selective inhibitors valdecoxib may cause severe allergic cutaneous reactions, adding a new aspect to the side effect profile of this drug.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Dieppe PA, Ebrahim S, Martin RM, Juni P. Lessons from the withdrawal of rofecoxib. BMJ. 2004;329:867–868.

2. 2Szczeklik A, Stevenson DD. Aspirin-induced asthma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:913–921. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (187 KB) | CrossRef

3. 3Kruse R, Ruzicka T, Grewe M. Intolerance reactions due to the selective cyclooxygenase type II inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib: results of oral provocation tests in patients with NSAID hypersensitivity. Acta Derm Venereol. 2003;83:183–185. MEDLINE | CrossRef

4. 4Sanchez Borges M, Capriles-Hulett A, Caballero-Fonseca F, Perez CR. Tolerability to new COX-2 inhibitors in NSAID-sensitive patients with cutaneous reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001;87:201–204. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (184 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5Grob M, Sheidegger P, Wuthrich B. Allergic skin reaction to celecoxib. Dermatology. 2000;201:383. MEDLINE | CrossRef

6. 6Munoz-Bellido FJ, Terron M, Leon A. Safety of rofecoxib in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs intolerance. Allergy. 2003;58:1072–1075.

7. 7Chavez ML, DeKorte CJ. Valdecoxib: a review. Clin Ther. 2003;25:817–851. MEDLINE | CrossRef

8. 8Alonso JC, Ortega JD, Gonzalo MJ. Cutaneous reaction to oral celecoxib with positive patch test. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50:48–49. MEDLINE | CrossRef

9. 9Goeschke B, Braathen LR. Acute generalized exanthematic pustulosis: a case and an overview of side effects affecting the skin caused by celecoxib and other COX-2 inhibitors reported so far. Dermatology. 2004;209:53–56. MEDLINE | CrossRef

10. 10Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson H, Bandmann HJ, Calnan CD, Cronin E, et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1970;50:287–292. MEDLINE

Department of Dermatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

PII: S0091-6749(05)00116-8

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.1135


View previous. 56 of 67 View next.