The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 114, Issue 6 , Pages 1449-1455 , December 2004

Rebound eosinophilia after treatment of hypereosinophilic syndrome and eosinophilic gastroenteritis with monoclonal anti–IL-5 antibody SCH55700

  • Yae-Jean Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases
  • ,
  • Calman Prussin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; Md
  • ,
  • Brian Martin, BS

      Affiliations

    • From the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases
  • ,
  • Melissa A. Law, RN

      Affiliations

    • From the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases
  • ,
  • Thomas P. Haverty, MD

      Affiliations

    • Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ
  • ,
  • Thomas B. Nutman, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases
  • ,
  • Amy D. Klion, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Amy D. Klion, MD, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 4, Rm B1-05, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Received 2 March 2004 ,Revised 8 August 2004 ,Accepted 10 August 2004.

  • Image Result

    Rebound eosinophilia after anti–IL-5 treatment. Each line shows an individual patient's changes in eosinophil counts. The dates plotted on the x-axis are not linear to show better the changes in eosin

    Rebound eosinophilia after anti–IL-5 treatment. Each line shows an individual patient's changes in eosinophil counts. The dates plotted on the x-axis are not linear to show better the changes in eosinophil count observed during the early time points after treatment. Open symbols, patients with HES; solid, patients with EGE. ∗, †, 2 nonresponding patients, patients 3 and 4.

  • Image Result
    Normal control and patient pretreatment in vitro eosinophil survival. Eosinophil survival was assessed in media (A) or in the presence of IL-5 (B) for patients and controls. Results are expressed as t

    Normal control and patient pretreatment in vitro eosinophil survival. Eosinophil survival was assessed in media (A) or in the presence of IL-5 (B) for patients and controls. Results are expressed as the geometric mean values for triplicate cultures for each donor. Each symbol represents 1 individual. Patients with the FIP1L1/PDGFRA fusion.

  • Image Result
    In vitro eosinophil survival responses before and after treatment with anti–IL-5. Eosinophil survival was assessed before and at 1 month posttreatment in media (A) and in the presence of IL-5 (B). Res

    In vitro eosinophil survival responses before and after treatment with anti–IL-5. Eosinophil survival was assessed before and at 1 month posttreatment in media (A) and in the presence of IL-5 (B). Results are expressed as the geometric mean values for triplicate cultures for each donor. Pretreatment and posttreatment responses are indicated by gray and black bars, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Prolongation of normal eosinophil survival by posttreatment patients' sera. Normal eosinophils were incubated with 1% sera from patients with HES (open symbols) or EGE (solid symbols) before and at 1

    Prolongation of normal eosinophil survival by posttreatment patients' sera. Normal eosinophils were incubated with 1% sera from patients with HES (open symbols) or EGE (solid symbols) before and at 1 month posttreatment, and survival was assessed by flow cytometry. The horizontal bars are the median values. P=.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

  • Image Result
    Reversal of the prolongation of normal eosinophil survival by posttreatment serum by the rat monoclonal antihuman IL-5 antibody TRFK5. Eosinophil survival was assessed in the presence of 1% posttreatm

    Reversal of the prolongation of normal eosinophil survival by posttreatment serum by the rat monoclonal antihuman IL-5 antibody TRFK5. Eosinophil survival was assessed in the presence of 1% posttreatment serum from a patient with HES and increasing concentrations of TRFK5 or rat IgG1κ isotype control antibody (B). Similar data are shown using a fixed concentration of recombinant IL-5 to prolong survival (A).

  • Image Result
    Changes in serum IL-5 levels. Serum IL-5 levels are compared before and at 2 to 3 days posttreatment (A) and at 2 to 3 days and 1 month posttreatment (B) for 6 patients with HES (open) or EGE (solid).

    Changes in serum IL-5 levels. Serum IL-5 levels are compared before and at 2 to 3 days posttreatment (A) and at 2 to 3 days and 1 month posttreatment (B) for 6 patients with HES (open) or EGE (solid). ∗, †, 2 nonresponding patients. P=.04 for comparison between 2-day to 3-day posttreatment and 1-month posttreatment serum IL-5 levels.

PII: S0091-6749(04)02241-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.027

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 114, Issue 6 , Pages 1449-1455 , December 2004