The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 111, Issue 4 , Pages 784-787, April 2003

High-efficiency particulate arrest–filter vacuum cleaners increase personal cat allergen exposure in homes with cats

North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital. Manchester, United Kingdom

Received 30 July 2002; received in revised form 5 December 2002; accepted 9 January 2003.

Abstract 

Background: On the basis of experimental chamber studies, vacuum cleaners with double-thickness bags and integral high-efficiency particulate arrest (HEPA) air filters are claimed to reduce airborne allergen levels and are currently recommended to allergic patients. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of vacuum cleaning on personal inhaled cat allergen exposure in homes with cats. Methods: Five unused new vacuum cleaners were compared with an old non-HEPA filter vacuum cleaner. Each vacuum cleaner was tested in an experimental chamber and in 5 homes with cats. Inhaled cat allergen was measured by nasal air sampling. Results: New vacuum cleaners failed to leak any allergen in the experimental chamber. There was a significant increase in inhaled cat allergen during vacuum cleaning in homes (F = 48.39, df = 1.4, P = .002) with no difference between the old vacuum cleaner and the unused new vacuum cleaners (5-fold and 3-fold increase compared to baseline, respectively; F = 0.005, df = 1.4, P = .95). Conclusions: The use of new HEPA-filter vacuum cleaners increases inhaled cat allergen in homes with cats. The use of HEPA-filter modern vacuum cleaners to reduce pet allergen exposure in the homes of pet owners should not be justified merely on the basis of experimental chamber data.

Keywords:  Nasal sampling, vacuum cleaning, Fel d 1, cat aller-gen, environmental control

Abbreviations:  HEPA: , High-efficiency particulate arrest, NAS: , Nasal air sampler

 

 Reprint requests: Robin Gore, MD, North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.

PII: S0091-6749(03)00743-7

doi:10.1067/mai.2003.1378

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 111, Issue 4 , Pages 784-787, April 2003