The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 107, Issue 3 , Pages 461-468, March 2001

Low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with montelukast for first-line treatment of persistent asthma: A randomized clinical trial☆☆

Presented in part at the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology annual meeting, November 6, 2000, in Seattle, Wash.

Madison, Wis, Bethesda, Md, Orange, Calif, and Research Triangle Park, NC

aUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison Medical School; bPrivate practice, Bethesda; cClinical Trials of Orange County; dGlaxo Wellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park

Received 1 November 2000; received in revised form 19 January 2001; accepted 19 January 2001.

Abstract 

Background: Both inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene modifiers are used in the maintenance treatment of persistent asthma. Objective: The goal was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate (FP) and montelukast as first-line maintenance therapy in symptomatic patients by using short-acting β2-agonists alone to treat persistent asthma. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 533 patients (>15 years old) with persistent asthma who remained symptomatic while taking short-acting β2-agonists alone were treated with FP (88 μg [2 puffs of 44 μg] twice daily) or montelukast (10 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. Results: Compared with treatment with montelukast, treatment with FP resulted in significantly greater improvements at endpoint in morning predose FEV1 (22.9% vs 14.5%, P < .001), forced midexpiratory flow (0.66 vs 0.41 L/sec, P < .001), forced vital capacity (0.42 vs 0.29 L, P = .002), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (68.5 vs 34.1 L/min, P < .001), and evening PEF (53.9 vs 28.7 L/min, P < .001). Similar improvements in PEF were observed in patients with milder asthma (>70%-80% predicted FEV1). At endpoint, FP was more effective than montelukast at decreasing rescue albuterol use (3.1 puffs/day vs 2.3 puffs/day, P < .001), asthma symptom scores (–0.85 [48.6% decrease] vs –0.60 [30.5%], P < .001), and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (–0.64 awakenings/night [62% decrease] vs –0.48 awakenings/night [47.5%], P = .023), and FP increased the percentage of symptom-free days (32.0% vs 18.4% of days, P < .001) compared with montelukast. The adverse event and asthma exacerbation profiles for FP and montelukast were similar. Conclusions: Low-dose FP is more effective than montelukast as first-line maintenance therapy for patients with persistent asthma who are undertreated and remain symptomatic while taking short-acting β2-agonists alone. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;107:461-8.)

Keywords:  Asthma, fluticasone propionate, inhaled corticosteroid, montelukast, leukotriene modifier

Abbreviations:  AQLQ: , Asthma quality-of-life questionnaire, BID: , Twice daily, FEF25%-75%: , Forced midexpiratory flow, FP: , Fluticasone propionate, FVC: , Forced vital capacity, MDI: , Metered-dose inhaler, PEF: , Peak expiratory flow, QD: , Once daily

 

 *Member names are listed in the Appendix.

☆☆ Supported by a grant from Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC.

 Reprint requests: William Busse, MD, University of Wisconsin–Madison Medical School, H6/367 Clinical Research Unit, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3244.

PII: S0091-6749(01)99420-5

doi:10.1067/mai.2001.114657

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 107, Issue 3 , Pages 461-468, March 2001