The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 117, Issue 1 , Pages 34-39, January 2006

“Black box” 101: How the Food and Drug Administration evaluates, communicates, and manages drug benefit/risk

  • Shirley Murphy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Shirley Murphy, MD, FDA/CDER/OCTAP, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Building 21, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
  • ,
  • Rosemary Roberts, MD

From the US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Counter-Terrorism and Pediatric Drug Development

Received 20 October 2005; accepted 24 October 2005.

Silver Spring, Md

A prominently displayed boxed warning, the so-called “black box,” is added to the labeling of drugs or drug products by the Food and Drug Administration when serious adverse reactions or special problems occur, particularly those that may lead to death or serious injury. Healthcare providers are often not knowledgeable about the origin, meaning, and implications of these “black box” warnings. In this review, our goal is to provide insight into how the Food and Drug Administration evaluates, communicates, and manages drug benefit/risk. We discuss drug labeling, the emphasis on safety throughout the drug approval process, legislative initiatives for safe use of drugs in children, and postmarketing safety surveillance. In addition, we encourage health care providers to report drug reactions to the Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch program. A discussion of new Food and Drug Administration initiatives to improve drug safety processes and methods to serve the public better are highlighted.

Key words: Food and Drug Administration, adverse drug reactions, MedWatch, “black box” warning, drug labeling, drug benefit/risk, risk management, postmarketing surveillance, drug development

Abbreviations used: AERS, Adverse Event Reporting System, CDER, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, CFR, Code of Federal Regulations, DSOB, Drug Safety Oversight Board, FDA, US Food and Drug Administration, IND, Investigational new drug, PDR, Physicians Desk Reference, NDA, New drug application

 

 The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of, nor imply endorsement from, the Food and Drug Administration of the US Government.

PII: S0091-6749(05)02325-0

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.10.031

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 117, Issue 1 , Pages 34-39, January 2006