Volume 128, Issue 4 , Pages 791-799.e6, October 2011
Subcutaneous immunotherapy and pharmacotherapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis: A comparison based on meta-analyses
Background
Allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is usually considered a “second-line,” slow-acting, disease-modifying treatment.
Objective
We sought to test whether SCIT is as effective as antisymptomatic treatment in the control of symptoms in patients with SAR in the first year of treatment.
Methods
We reviewed meta-analyses with 5 or more randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of SCIT or antisymptomatic treatment in patients with SAR. We then selected trials measuring the total nasal symptom score (TNSS), the total symptom score (TSS), or both during the first pollen season after treatment initiation. Efficacy was determined as the percentage reduction in TSSs and TNSSs obtained with active treatment compared with placebo (relative clinical impact [RCI]) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) of treatment verses placebo (effect size [ES]).
Results
The weighted mean RCI of SCIT on TNSSs (−34.7% ± 6.8%) was higher than those of mometasone (−31.7% ± 16.7%, P < .00001) and montelukast (−6.3% ± 3.0%, P < .00001). The weighted mean RCI of SCIT on TSSs (−32.9% ± 12.7%) was higher than that of desloratadine (−12.0% ± 5.1%, P < .00001). The overall ES of SCIT in terms of TNSSs (SMD, −0.94; 95% CI, −1.45 to −0.43) was similar to that of mometasone (SMD, −0.47; 95% CI, −0.63 to −0.32; P > .05) and higher than that of montelukast (SMD, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.33 to −0.16; P < .05). The overall ES of SCIT in terms of TSSs (SMD, −0.86; 95% CI, −1.17 to −0.55) was comparable with that of desloratadine (SMD, −1.00; 95% CI, −1.68 to −0.32; P > .05).
Conclusions
Our data provide indirect but consistent evidence that SCIT is at least as potent as pharmacotherapy in controlling the symptoms of SAR as early as the first season of treatment.
Key words: Seasonal allergic rhinitis, allergen-specific immunotherapy, allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy, nasal corticosteroids, antihistamines, leukotriene antagonists
Abbreviations used: ES, Effect size, LA, Leukotriene antagonist, MoE, Magnitude of efficacy, RCI, Relative clinical impact, SAR, Seasonal allergic rhinitis, SCIT, Allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy, SIT, Allergen-specific immunotherapy, SMD, Standardized mean difference, TNSS, Total nasal symptom score, TSS, Total symptom score, WAO, World Allergy Organization
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: P. M. Matricardi receives honoraria from Allergopharma and Meda Pharma and receives research support from Allergopharma and the German Research Foundation. P. Kuna has consultant arrangements with ALK-Abelló and receives lecture fees from Allergopharma-Nexter. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(11)00662-2
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.03.049
© 2011 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 128, Issue 4 , Pages 791-799.e6, October 2011
