Volume 121, Issue 1 , Pages 105-109, January 2008
Intranasal noninhaled carbon dioxide for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
Background
Noninhaled intranasal carbon dioxide (CO2) has been shown to be effective in the abortive treatment of migraine headache. Migraine headache is associated with trigeminal neuronal activation and release of calcitonin gene-related peptide, events also implicated in allergic rhinitis. Intranasal CO2 might inhibit trigeminal neuronal activation and suppress the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide.
Objective
We studied whether noninhaled intranasal CO2 would be effective in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Methods
We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Treatment consisted of either CO2 (verum) or air (placebo) at a 2:1 ratio administered in each nostril for 60 seconds per nostril at a flow rate of 10 mL/s. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in total nasal symptom score (TNSS), the sum of congestion, rhinorrhea, itching, and sneezing scored on a 0- to 5-point scale, at 30 minutes.
Results
Eighty-nine subjects received treatment, 60 with CO2 and 29 with placebo, and all subjects completed the study. CO2 resulted in a statistically significant improvement in TNSS at 30 minutes over placebo (absolute changes of 5.0 for CO2 and 2.2 for placebo, P = .00019). Improvement from baseline in TNSS (CO2 vs placebo) was statistically significant at 10 minutes and remained so for 24 hours.
Conclusion
Two 60-second intranasal CO2 treatments resulted in rapid (10 minutes) and sustained (24 hours) relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms.
Key words: Carbon dioxide, topical nasal administration, clinical trial, allergic rhinitis
Abbreviations used: ANCOVA, Analysis of covariance, CGRP, Calcitonin gene-related peptide, TNNSS, Total non-nasal symptom score, TNSS, Total nasal symptom score
Sponsored by Capnia Incorporated, Palo Alto, Calif.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: T. B. Casale has consulting arrangements with and has received grant support from Capnia. E. L. H. Spierings has consulting arrangements with Capnia. F. A. Romero has declared that he has no conflict of interest.
PII: S0091-6749(07)01657-0
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.056
© 2008 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 121, Issue 1 , Pages 105-109, January 2008
