The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 119, Issue 6 , Pages 1497-1503, June 2007

Treatment of acute edema attacks in hereditary angioedema with a bradykinin receptor-2 antagonist (Icatibant)

  • Konrad Bork, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Konrad Bork, MD, Universitaets-Hautklinik, Langenbeckstr 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
  • ,
  • Jorge Frank, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Maastricht
  • ,
  • Boris Grundt, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Dermatology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
  • ,
  • Peter Schlattmann, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Medical Informatics, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Charité, Berlin
  • ,
  • Juerg Nussberger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne
  • ,
  • Wolfhart Kreuz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center of Pediatrics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt

Received 15 November 2006; received in revised form 23 January 2007; accepted 12 February 2007. published online 06 April 2007.

Mainz, Berlin, and Frankfurt, Germany, Maastricht, The Netherlands, and Lausanne, Switzerland

Background

In hereditary angioedema, bradykinin is assumed to be the most important mediator of edema formation.

Objective

To assess whether the selective bradykinin receptor-2 antagonist Icatibant is effective in acute edema attacks of hereditary angioedema.

Methods

In this uncontrolled pilot study, 15 patients with 20 attacks were treated with Icatibant. The attacks were analyzed by using a standardized and validated visual analog scale measurement and compared with historical data of untreated attacks. Plasma bradykinin concentration was measured before and 4 hours after intravenous Icatibant treatment.

Results

Symptom intensity decreased within 4 hours after administration of Icatibant; the median time to onset of symptom relief was 1.50, 1.42, and 1.13 hours in the intravenous groups and 0.58 and 0.45 hours in the subcutaneous groups, respectively. The median difference in the 10-cm visual analog scale 4 hours after start of treatment was 4.11 cm (95% CI, 1.72-6.07). Compared with untreated attacks, Icatibant treatment reduced the mean (SD) time to onset of symptom relief by 97% from 42 ± 14 to 1.16 ± 0.95 hours (all groups combined). Median bradykinin concentration was 7-fold above the norm during acute attacks at 48.5 pmol/L and decreased to 18.0 pmol/L 4 hours after Icatibant infusion or injection.

Conclusion

Icatibant was effective in treating acute attacks of hereditary angioedema.

Clinical implications

This is the first report demonstrating the clinical usefulness of antagonizing bradykinin binding to bradykinin receptor-2 in hereditary angioedema.

Key words: Angioedema, hereditary angioedema, C1 inhibitor deficiency, bradykinin, bradykinin receptor-2 antagonist, Icatibant

Abbreviations used: BR, Bradykinin receptor, C1-INH, C1 esterase inhibitor, HAE, Hereditary angioedema, VAS, Visual analog scale

 

 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: K. Bork and P. Schlattmann have received grant support from Jerini AG. J. Nussberger has consulting arrangements with and has received grant support from Jerini AG. The rest of the authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

PII: S0091-6749(07)00379-X

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.012

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 119, Issue 6 , Pages 1497-1503, June 2007