The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 116, Issue 1 , Pages 65-72 , July 2005

Modulation of GM-CSF release by enantiomers of β-agonists in human airway smooth muscle

  • Bill T. Ameredes, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Bill T. Ameredes, PhD, Research Assistant Professor of Medicine, Asthma, Allergy, and Airway Research Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 628NW Montefiore University Hospital, 3459 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
  • ,
  • William J. Calhoun, MD

Received 15 June 2004 ,Revised 1 March 2005 ,Accepted 7 March 2005.

  • Image Result

    GM-CSF release with enantiomers and propranolol (10 μmol/L; hatched bars) relative to control (dashed line; [enantiomer]=0). (R)-albuterol (n=6), (S)-albuterol (n=4), (R)-+(S)-albuterol (n=4), (R,R)-f

    GM-CSF release with enantiomers and propranolol (10 μmol/L; hatched bars) relative to control (dashed line; [enantiomer]=0). (R)-albuterol (n=6), (S)-albuterol (n=4), (R)-+(S)-albuterol (n=4), (R,R)-formoterol (n=6), (S,S)-formoterol (n=4), or (R,R)-+(S,S)-formoterol (n=4). Symbols indicate P < .05 for comparison versus respective control, +respective enantiomer at same concentration, respective (R)-enantiomer at same concentration, and #(R)-albuterol at same concentration.

  • Image Result
    A, GM-CSF release by HASMC with propranolol (○) and ICI-118,511 (•). ∗P < .05 compared with control (0 μmol/L propranolol=467 pg/mL ± 4 pg/mL; 0 μmol/L ICI-118,551=1079 pg/mL ± 28 pg/mL); n=5 experime

    A, GM-CSF release by HASMC with propranolol (○) and ICI-118,511 (•). P < .05 compared with control (0 μmol/L propranolol=467 pg/mL ± 4 pg/mL; 0 μmol/L ICI-118,551=1079 pg/mL ± 28 pg/mL); n=5 experiments per concentration. B, Intracellular cAMP levels in HASMC with propranolol (n=2) and ICI-118,551 (n=4); significance as in A; mean baseline cAMP=1.9 pmol/mL ± 0.1 pmol/mL.

  • Image Result
    Propranolol concentration and GM-CSF release response relationship versus single concentration (10 μmol/L) of either (R)-albuterol (left) or (R,R)-formoterol (right) in HASMC. Symbols indicate P < .05

    Propranolol concentration and GM-CSF release response relationship versus single concentration (10 μmol/L) of either (R)-albuterol (left) or (R,R)-formoterol (right) in HASMC. Symbols indicate P < .05 for comparison versus respective control (0 μmol/L propranolol), (R)-albuterol at same concentration; n=5 experiments/bar.

  • Image Result
    Intracellular cAMP with increasing (R)-albuterol alone (□; n=2) and with increasing (R)-albuterol plus propranolol (•; 0 μmol/L or 10 μmol/L; n=2), expressed as a function of baseline intracellular cA

    Intracellular cAMP with increasing (R)-albuterol alone (□; n=2) and with increasing (R)-albuterol plus propranolol (•; 0 μmol/L or 10 μmol/L; n=2), expressed as a function of baseline intracellular cAMP in HASMC with no drugs added (horizontal dashed line; 1.2 pmol/mL ± 0.4 pmol/mL).

  • Image Result
    GM-CSF release with dibutyryl cAMP alone (•) and with dibutyryl cAMP plus propranolol (○; 100 μmol/L),∗P < .05; versus 0 μmol/L dibutyryl cAMP, †P < .05; versus dibutyryl cAMP alone at same concentrat

    GM-CSF release with dibutyryl cAMP alone (•) and with dibutyryl cAMP plus propranolol (○; 100 μmol/L),P < .05; versus 0 μmol/L dibutyryl cAMP, †P < .05; versus dibutyryl cAMP alone at same concentration; r2>.99 for regression of both data sets; horizontal dashed line indicates control GM-CSF release with 0 μmol/L dibutyryl cAMP (1672 pg/mL ± 22 pg/mL); n=5 experiments per set.

  • Image Result
    Effects of dexamethasone (Dex) in combination with enantiomers. GM-CSF expressed as ratios relative to –Dex, 0 enantiomer control (range: 1800-2700 pg/mL); percentage change values as shown. ∗P < .05

    Effects of dexamethasone (Dex) in combination with enantiomers. GM-CSF expressed as ratios relative to –Dex, 0 enantiomer control (range: 1800-2700 pg/mL); percentage change values as shown. P < .05 vs –Dex, 0 agonist (no drugs) control; +P < .05 vs –Dex, 10 μmol/L agonist; P < .05 vs +Dex, 0 agonist; n=4-10 experiments/bar.

 Supported by the American Respiratory Alliance of Western Pennsylvania and Sepracor, Inc.Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: Bill Ameredes and William Calhoun have consultant arrangements with Sepracor, Inc, receive grant/research support from Sepracor, Inc, and are on the speakers' bureau for Sepracor, Inc.

PII: S0091-6749(05)00526-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.03.007

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 116, Issue 1 , Pages 65-72 , July 2005