The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 114, Issue 6 , Pages 1389-1394, December 2004

Asthma and sensitization in a community with low indoor allergen levels and low pet-keeping frequency

  • Mahdi Sayed Hassan Al-Mousawi, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester
    • World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester
    • ,
  • Hermione Lovel, PhD

      Affiliations

    • World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester
    • ,
  • Nasser Behbehani, MD

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Medicine, University of Kuwait
    • ,
  • Nermina Arifhodzic, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Al Rashid Allergy Centre, Kuwait City
    • ,
  • Ashley Woodcock, MD, FRCP

      Affiliations

    • From the North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester
    • ,
  • Adnan Custovic, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Adnan Custovic, MD, PhD, North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom.

Received 3 June 2004; received in revised form 7 September 2004; accepted 9 September 2004. published online 22 October 2004.

Manchester, United Kingdom, and Kuwait City, Kuwait

Article Outline

Background

Little is known about causes of asthma and sensitization in desert countries.

Objective

To investigate risk factors associated with asthma and sensitization in Kuwait.

Methods

One hundred sixty children (9-16 years) with physician-diagnosed asthma were recruited and matched (age, sex) with 303 healthy controls. Risk factors were assessed by questionnaires, determination of sensitization status (skin tests and IgE), and home allergen exposure (mite, cat, dog, cockroach; ELISA).

Results

Home allergen levels and frequency of pet ownership were very low (cat, 4.1%; dog, 1.5%). The risk of cat sensitization increased significantly among cat owners (odds ratio [OR], 3.53; 95% CI, 1.33-9.41; P=.01), and in children with reported contact with cats during the first year of life (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.17-5.80; P=.019). In the multivariate analysis, maternal atopy (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.13-2.75; P=.01) and cat ownership (OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.19-9.25; P=.02) remained significant associates of cat sensitization. Current dog ownership significantly increased the risk of sensitization to dog (OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 1.33-27.54; P=.02). In the multivariate analysis, dog ownership remained the only significant associate of dog sensitization (OR, 6.02; 95% CI, 1.30-27.96; P=.02). Sensitization to Alternaria was the strongest independent associate of the asthma group. Family history of asthma, history of whooping cough, current cat ownership, and breast-feeding <2 months were other significant and independent risk factors for asthma.

Conclusions

Pet ownership markedly increased the risk of sensitization to pets. Despite low allergen exposure, the pattern of childhood asthma in Kuwait follows that described in Western communities (strong association with sensitization).

Key words: Asthma, sensitization, domestic pets, allergen exposure

Abbreviation used: OR, Odds ratio

 

Many areas of the world have had an increase in the prevalence of allergic sensitization asthma in the last several decades.1., 2., 3. IgE-mediated sensitization is a strong risk factor for asthma.4 Allergen exposure is a prerequisite for the development of sensitization, and for dust mite and cockroach, there is a dose-response relationship between exposure and sensitization.5., 6. However, allergen exposure does not appear to be implicated in the development of asthma.7 The effect of pet ownership and exposure to pet allergens on the development of sensitization and asthma is even less clear. On the basis of the currently available evidence, any association among pet ownership, sensitization, and asthma can be supported (ie, increase in risk, protection, or no effect8., 9., 10.). However, most of the studies investigating the relationship between allergen exposure, pet ownership, and asthma and allergy have been performed in the areas where mites,5., 10. or cockroaches,6 or domestic pets dominate sensitization.11

Kuwait is a country in the Arabian Peninsula. Because of its climate and cultural avoidance of pets, it offers a unique environment to investigate these relationships. The climate is dry, with an average annual rainfall of less than 15 cm. Average summer day temperature is approximately 42°C, and the mean relative humidity ranges from 15% to 30%. These climatic conditions are not conducive for dust mite population survival. The frequency of cat and dog ownership is very low, because pet ownership is not socially acceptable. There is little vegetation in most of the country. Prosopis juliflora (Velvet mesquite, a perennial deciduous thorny shrub or small tree) has been planted to reclaim the desert land, and its plantations provide shelter and prevent landslides. Allergic diseases were extremely rare in Kuwait until the mid-1950s.12 Since then, however, the prevalence seems to have increased rapidly. Within a 3-year period (1982-1985), asthma admissions among Kuwaiti children had increased from 9% to 15% of all emergency admissions.13 In the year 2000, the prevalence rates of wheeze ever, current wheeze, and physician-diagnosed asthma were 26%, 16%, and 15%, respectively.14

We hypothesized that the indoor allergen exposure in this area would be low, and aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with childhood asthma and allergic sensitization.

Back to Article Outline

Methods 

Participants 

Children with asthma, age 8 to 15 years (cases), were recruited into the study from the local allergy center (n=92), family practices (n=46), and pediatric asthma clinics in 3 main hospitals in Kuwait (n=22) if all of the following criteria were met: (1) physician-diagnosed asthma, (2) asthma symptoms (wheeze, cough, or both) within the previous 12 months, and (3) use of antiasthma medication. For each case, 2 age-matched (±2 years) and sex-matched control subjects without respiratory symptoms (confirmed by an interviewer-administered questionnaire) were randomly selected from local schools within 3 weeks of enrolling a case, and social and environmental variables were matched with the general population. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all parents (and children when appropriate).

Outcomes 

We ascertained housing conditions, family history, parental smoking, pet ownership, and pet contact by standard respiratory and environmental questionnaires (ISAAC15 and ATS16).

Sensitization status was determined by skin prick testing (n=461) by using the extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat, dog, cockroach, Aspergillus, Alternaria, Cladosporium, trees mix, and grass mix with negative and positive control (Bayer, Elkhart, Ind). Sensitization was defined as a weal diameter 3 mm greater than negative control.

Total and specific serum IgE (n=430; D pteronyssinus, cat, dog, cockroach, Alternaria, Bermuda grass, Prosopis tree, ascaris) was measured by using the ImmunoCAP assay (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Sensitization was defined as a concentration of allergen-specific IgE >0.35 kU/L.

Indoor allergen exposure was determined as follows. Homes were visited, and dust samples from the child's mattress and the lounge floor were collected and extracted. Mite (Der p 1 and Der f 1), cat (Fel d 1), dog (Can f 1), and cockroach (Bla g 2) allergens were assayed by using mAb-based enzyme-linked immunoassay.17., 18., 19., 20. A total of 420 homes were visited (7 refused a home visit; 36 supplied incomplete addresses).

Statistical analysis 

To estimate the sample size, we made an assumption that asthma prevalence in Kuwaiti children was ∼10%. With a logistic regression analysis, a study of 129 cases and 262 controls has >95% power to detect an odds ratio (OR) of ≥2.8 at a level of significance <.05.

Allergen levels did not follow the normal distribution; the data are thus reported as median, range, and interquartile range, and the comparisons were performed by using the appropriate nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test). Initially, risk factors were assessed by means of univariate analysis to see how each potential explanatory variable affected the probability of having asthma. Variables were then tested in a forward stepwise multivariate analysis combining the relevant variables to control for the effect of each explanatory variable on the other variables studied. Factors significantly associated with the asthma group in the univariate analysis were examined in multivariate regression analysis. The size of the effect of each of the risk factors was measured by using the ORs and 95% CIs. Data were analyzed by using SPSS software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill), version 10.0.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

A total of 160 patients with asthma (117 male; mean age, 12.5 years) and 303 age-matched and sex-matched controls participated in the study (135 cases were successfully matched with 2 controls, whereas 13 had 1 matched control).

Pet ownership and indoor allergen levels 

Allergen levels in the dust samples from homes were all extremely low (Table I). Der p 1 was above the detection limit of the assay in only 2 samples, and Der f 1 was detected in 9 samples. Bla g 2 levels in the dust samples were generally low.

Table I. House dust mite, cat, dog and cockroach allergens in dust samples from homes (μg/g fine dust)
Lounge floorMattress
Below detection limitMedian (interquartile range) [range]Below detection limitMedian (interquartile range) [range]
Der p 1382/383 (99.7%)NA [0.05-0.16]378/379 (99.7%)NA [0.05-0.10]
Der f 1381/383 (99.5%)NA [0.05-10.70]368/375 (98.1%)NA [0.05-11.00]
Fel d 145/382 (11.8%)0.16 (0.08-0.36) [0.05-700]57/376 (15.2%)0.14 (0.08-0.27) [0.05-410]
Can f 1332/383 (86.7%)NA [0.05-8.75]316/379 (83.4%)NA [0.05-8.00]
Bla g 2168/381 (44.1%)0.07 (0.05-0.26) [0.05-7.38]196/378 (51.9%)0.05 (0.05-0.32) [0.05-10.5]

The frequency of current pet ownership was very low (cat, 4.1% [19/463]; dog, 1.5% [7/463]). Fel d 1 was significantly higher in houses with a cat (n=19) compared with those without a cat (P < .001; Table II) and in homes of children who reported contact with a cat outside the house at least once a week (n=24) compared with children with no regular contact with a cat (n=377; lounge floor, P=.002; mattress, P=.03; Table II). Similarly, Can f 1 was significantly higher in houses with a dog (n=7) compared with those without a dog (lounge floor, P=.001; mattress, P=.003; Table II), but there was no difference between homes of children who reported contact with a dog outside the house at least once a week (n=8) compared with those with no regular contact with dogs (n=405; Table II).

Table II. Pet ownership, contact with pets, and pet allergen levels μg/g fine dust)
Lounge floorMattress
Fel d 1, median (interquartile range) [range]Fel d 1, median (interquartile range) [range]
Cat owner0.63 (0.21-23.60) [0.05-700]0.50 (0.16-3.40) [0.08-410]
Regular contact with cats outside home0.38 (0.17-0.81) [0.05-11.60]0.18 (0.11-0.76) [0.05-9.40]
No contact with cats0.15 (0.08-0.30) [0.05-6.60]0.13 (0.07-0.25) [0.05-38.20]
Can f 1, median (interquartile range) [range]Can f 1, median (interquartile range) [range]
Dog owner0.16 (0.05-0.90) [0.05-8.75]0.14 (0.05-0.52) [0.05-8.00]
Regular contact with dogs outside homeAll samples below the detection limit0.05 (0.05-0.05) [0.05-0.40]
No contact with dogs0.05 (0.05-0.05) [0.05-8.25]0.05 (0.05-0.05) [0.05-0.90]

Risk factors for IgE-mediated sensitization 

In comparison with noncat owners with no regular contact with cats, the risk of positive skin test to cat increased in children with regular contact with cats at least once a week outside the home (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.80-4.44; P=.15) and increased further and significantly among current cat owners (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.33-9.41; P=.01). Reported contact with cats during the first year of life and current exposure to a high level of Fel d 1 (>8 μg/g in mattress dust) were significant associates of a positive skin test to cat (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.17-5.80; P=.019; and OR, 6.20; 95% CI, 1.52-25.30; P=.01, respectively).

The proportion of children with a positive specific IgE to cat increased from 21.0% (82/390) among noncat owners with no regular contact with cats to 37.5% (9/24) in those with regular contact with cats and 56.3% (9/16) among cat owners (P for trend, <.001).

To assess the independent effect of cat ownership on sensitization to cats (assessed by skin test), the adjustment for potential confounding factors (parental histories of atopy, maternal smoking, socioeconomic status, and presence of older siblings) was modeled by using multivariate logistic regression. Maternal atopy (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.13-2.75; P=.01) and current cat ownership remained significant associates of sensitization to cat (by using noncat owners with no regular contact with cats as a reference group, the risk of sensitization to cat increased significantly among cat owners: OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.19-9.25; P=.02). Similar data were obtained for specific IgE to cat.

Current dog ownership significantly increased the risk of sensitization to dog (skin test, OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 1.33-27.54; P=.02; IgE, OR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.51-31.56; P=.01). In the multivariate analysis (controlling for the effect of parental history of atopy, maternal smoking, socioeconomic status, and presence of older siblings), dog ownership remained the only significant associate of sensitization to dog (skin test, OR, 6.02; 95% CI, 1.30-27.96; P=.02; IgE, OR, 6.76; 95% CI, 1.44-31.64; P=.01). Can f 1 level did not reach the level suggested as a threshold level for sensitization (10 μg/g) in any of the homes. We defined high exposure as a detectable Can f 1 in the lounge floor dust. Dog sensitization (IgE) was significantly associated with exposure to Can f 1 (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.17-5.58; P=.018). There was no association between cat or dog ownership and sensitization to other allergens.

Cockroach sensitization (IgE) was significantly associated with exposure to high level of Bla g 2 (>2 U/g in lounge floor; OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.06-9.94; P=.04). Too few samples had detectable mite allergen to perform any exposure-sensitization analysis.

Risk factors for asthma 

The significant associates of asthma group in the univariate analysis are presented in Table III. Asthma was associated with specific sensitization to a range of indoor and outdoor allergens, current cat ownership, regular contact with cats during the first year of life, family history of asthma, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, and a history of whooping cough. Significant protective factors in the univariate analysis were breast-feeding >2months, day-care attendance, and sharing a bed with other family members. There was no significant difference between children with and without asthma in the levels of mite, cat, dog, and cockroach allergens. Type of heating, floor covering, air conditioning, and other housing characteristics did not differ between the groups.

Table III. Univariate analysis of the risk factors for asthma
AsthmaControlOR (95% CI)Significance
Maternal asthma27 (17%)19 (6%)3.13 (1.70-5.74)<.001
Paternal asthma20 (13%)17 (6%)2.37 (1.27-4.40).006
Asthma in other family member107 (63%)106 (35%)3.82 (2.55-5.74)<.001
>20 Cigarettes smoked at home26 (17%)26 (9%)1.92 (1.05-3.51).033
History of whooping cough10 (6%)3 (1%)6.60 (1.79-24.34).005
Current cat ownership14 (9%)5 (2%)5.82 (2.05-16.46).001
Contact with cats at least once a week22 (14%)19 (6%)2.36 (1.23-4.50).009
Contact with cats during first year of life14 (9%)12 (4%)2.30 (1.04-5.10).04
Breast feeding >2 mo109 (69%)238 (79%)0.57 (0.37-0.89).009
Attending day care16 (10%)50 (17%)0.56 (0.30-1.00).05
Bed sharing with other family member8 (5%)38 (13%)0.37 (0.17-0.81).012

Skin prick tests

N=158N=303
Cat73 (46%)46 (15%)4.80 (3.08-7.47)<.001
Grass mix58 (37%)56 (19%)2.60 (1.66-3.95)<.001
Dog55 (35%)31 (10%)4.69 (2.86-7.69)<.001
Aspergillus37 (24%)12 (4%)7.42 (3.74-14.71)<.001
Cockroach34 (22%)35 (12%)2.10 (1.25-3.52).005
House dust mite31 (20%)13 (4%)5.45 (2.76-10.75)<.001
Trees mix30 (19%)15 (5%)4.50 (2.34-8.65)<.001
Cladosporium28 (18%)7 (2%)9.11 (3.88-21.38)<.001
Alternaria alternata29 (18%)6 (2%)11.13 (4.50-27.45)<.001
At least 1118 (75%)114 (38%)4.89 (3.19-7.50)<.001

Specific serum IgE

N=154N=285
Bermuda grass86 (56%)87 (31%)2.84 (1.89-4.25)<.001
P julifora67 (43%)58 (20%)2.98 (1.94-4.58)<.001
Cat59 (38%)43 (15%)3.46 (2.19-5.47)<.001
A alternata54 (35%)12 (4%)12.16 (6.25-36.70)<.001
House dust mite46 (30%)24 (8%)4.59 (2.67-7.89)<.001
Dog44 (28%)30 (11%)3.37 (2.01-5.64)<.001
Cockroach44 (28%)50 (18%)1.86 (1.17-2.96).009
Ascaris26 (17%)22 (7%)2.41 (1.32-4.42).004
At least 1124 (80%)133 (47%)4.69 (2.96-7.45)<.001

Multivariate analyses 

Significant factors from the univariate analysis were considered in the multivariate regression analysis. Separate analyses were performed for sensitization status determined by using skin tests (Table IV) and specific serum IgE (Table V). In both models family history of asthma, history of whooping cough and current cat ownership remained significant and independent risk factors for asthma, whereas breast-feeding >2 months was protective. For both skin tests and IgE measurement, sensitization to Alternaria was the strongest independent risk factor associated with patient group. Other sensitizations significantly associated with asthma group were Cladosporium, tree mix, cat, and dust mite (skin tests; Table IV) and P juliflora (IgE; Table V).

Table IV. Multivariate analysis of the risk factors for asthma∗
Adjusted OR (95% CI)Significance
Asthma in other family member3.03 (1.81-5.07)<.001
History of whooping cough5.96 (1.39-25.58).02
Current cat ownership3.67 (1.00-3.74).05
Breast-feeding >2 mo0.54 (0.30-0.96).04
Sensitization to
A alternata7.36 (2.50-21.65)<.001
Cladosporium4.70 (1.77-12.23).002
Trees mix3.31 (1.38-7.95).007
Cat3.11 (1.75-5.53)<.001
House dust mite3.20 (1.30-7.90).012

∗Sensitization defined by skin prick testing (weal diameter 3 mm greater than negative control).

Table V. Multivariate analysis of the risk factors for asthma∗
Adjusted OR (95% CI)Significance
Asthma in other family member3.33 (1.98-5.60)<.001
History of whooping cough5.62 (1.35-23.33).018
Current cat ownership5.29 (1.51-18.55).009
Breast-feeding >2 months0.45 (0.26-0.80).006
Sensitization to
A alternata15.35 (7.18-32.83).001
P julifora2.39 (1.39-4.12).013

∗Sensitization defined as a concentration of allergen-specific IgE >0.35 kU/L.

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

The results of the current study suggest that the pattern of childhood asthma in Kuwait follows that already been described in Western communities, ie, that it is strongly associated with sensitization to allergens. However, the striking characteristic of this area is very low domestic exposure to allergens commonly associated with asthma, namely mite, cockroach, cat, and dog. The frequency of pet ownership was also very low. In this population, the risk of sensitization to cat increased among current cat owners, children who reported contact with cats during the first year of life, and those currently exposed to a high level of cat allergen. Current dog ownership and high exposure to dog allergen increased the risk of sensitization to dog. Sensitization to allergens, family history of asthma, history of whooping cough, and current cat ownership increased the risk for asthma, whereas breast-feeding was protective.

A high sensitization rate to cat in the current study is consistent with previous studies from Kuwait.21., 22. The frequency of cat sensitization is similar to the data reported in some European23., 24. and North American studies,25., 26. but considerably higher compared with several other studies from Europe27 and North and South America.28., 29. In comparison with these communities, both the cat-keeping frequency and cat allergen levels in homes in Kuwait were markedly lower.23., 25., 27., 30. Similarly, dog ownership was much less common, and dog allergen level in homes in Kuwait were considerably lower than in the United Kingdom and northern Sweden (eg, we estimate that Can f 1 in homes with dogs in Kuwait is ∼30-fold lower compared with the homes of dog owners in the United Kingdom and/or Sweden),23., 30. and only marginally higher than the very low level found in Ghana.30 Can f 1 concentration in the current study did not reach the level usually defined as the threshold for sensitization (10 μg/g) in any of the homes. Despite the fact very few families kept dogs at home and very low allergen levels, sensitization to dogs was common both in children with asthma (>30%) and in controls without asthma (∼10%). Indeed, the dog sensitization rate in Kuwait is higher than that reported in most of the studies from Europe23., 27. and the United States.26., 28.

It was long assumed that pet ownership was a risk factor for sensitization. However, epidemiologic studies performed in areas with high prevalence of cat ownership failed to confirm this.9., 11., 31., 32. There is now a body of evidence to suggest that in areas with a high proportion of cat ownership, the risk of sensitization to cats (and to other allergens) and of asthma decreases among cat owners.11., 31., 33. It has been hypothesized that high exposure to cat allergen may induce tolerance in some individuals.34

All of the work suggesting a protective effect of pet ownership and pet allergen exposure comes from areas with a high proportion of pet ownership.9., 11., 31., 32., 33., 34. Pet allergens are passively transferred from the homes of pet owners to homes without pets and to public places,20 and this passive exposure is likely to be higher in areas where pet ownership is more common. In such areas, it is likely that the passive exposure is sufficient for nonpet owners to become sensitized, and it is certainly true that sensitization cannot be prevented by banning pets from the home.34 However, the results of studies conducted in areas with a high proportion of pet ownership may not apply to other areas with fewer cats and dogs. Indeed, we have previously demonstrated that the levels of pet allergens in Kuwait are very low in public places.35 This, coupled with the findings of the current study of very low levels of pet allergens in homes of nonpet owners, suggests that individuals not owning a pet are probably not exposed to pet allergens, or that the level of exposure is very low. In an area like this, pet ownership markedly increases the risk of sensitization to pets. In addition, pet allergen levels in homes of pet owners in Kuwait appeared much lower in comparison with European and US studies, with levels arguably insufficiently high to induce tolerance. To a certain degree, this may be a consequence of lifestyle and housing (absence of carpets, frequent vacuum cleaning, air conditioning, and so forth).

Our data are consistent with the recent report from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey suggesting that cat ownership in childhood is associated with an increased risk in adult asthma among subjects who grew up in the area with relatively low public exposure to cats, but a cat at home was not associated with increased asthma risk in participants from areas with a high proportion of cat ownership.36 Clearly, the effect of pet ownership may differ markedly between different areas and is related to the prevalence of pet ownership and the community exposure to pet allergens. This may at least in part explain the discrepancies between different studies. In areas with low pet ownership frequency, it is likely that pet ownership increases the risk of sensitization (and perhaps asthma).

However, it remains difficult to explain the high sensitization rate to pet allergens in the current study, in the area where allergen exposure is so low. In this study, we used measurement of current allergen exposure as a surrogate for the cumulative exposure, raising the question whether the allergen level in a single dust sample can be considered an appropriate index of exposure. It has been argued that early-life allergen exposure is critical in the development of sensitization. However, because domestic allergen levels are very low, it is unlikely that the timing of dust collection has influenced the results.

Many Kuwaiti families spend their summer holidays in Europe and North America. Short exposure to pet allergens during the overseas visits may be one of the factors responsible for the high rates of sensitization to cats and dogs. This raises the real possibility that transient exposure can induce sensitization. It is also possible that factors other than allergen exposure are responsible for very high sensitization rates to cats and dogs in Kuwait.

Not surprisingly, we found that dust mite allergen levels in homes in Kuwait were very low. Der p 1 levels in all but 2 samples from homes were below the limit of detection. Der f 1 was detected at very low levels in only 2 samples from living rooms and 7 samples from bedding. Very low levels of Der p 1, below the limit of detection, were also observed in a neighboring desert country, Saudi Arabia.37 Previous studies among children with asthma in Kuwait have also shown a broadly similar sensitization rate to dust mite compared with the current study.22., 38. Interestingly, a study conducted in Kuwait 2 decades ago reported a much lower rate of sensitization to dust mite (1.5%).39 Thus, comparing our data with those available from Kuwait 20 to 25 years ago, it would appear that the prevalence of both asthma and sensitization rates have increased dramatically. However, we must be cautious when comparing these data, because of the possibility that the differing methodology and extracts used to assess sensitization rates in these studies are responsible for at least a part of the observed differences cannot be discounted. Nevertheless, the data would suggest that there has been a real and substantial increase in the prevalence of sensitization in Kuwait over the period of the last 2 decades. Very low levels of indoor allergens found in dust in the presence of high rates of sensitization (80% among children with asthma) suggest that increase in indoor allergen exposure cannot be the major contributing factor to the apparent increase in sensitization, asthma prevalence, and asthma severity in Kuwait. Clearly, factors other than allergen exposure are responsible for the perceived dramatic increase in asthma and atopic sensitization in this part of the world. This factor (or factors) could increase the susceptibility of the population to atopic sensitization and/or asthma, so that even very low levels of exposure could have induced sensitization.

Back to Article Outline

 

The authors thank Charles Ezeamuzie, PhD, for performing the IgE analysis; Adel Kheder, MD, and Abdul-Rahman Al-Dowaisan, MD, for facilitating the conduct of this study; Julie Morris, MSc, for help with the statistical design and analysis; and Mark Craven, MSc, for help with the allergen assays.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Aberg N, Hesselmar B, Aberg B, Rikson B. Increase of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema in Swedish school children between 1979 and 1991. Clin Exp Allergy. 1995;25:815–819
  2. Burr ML, Butland BK, King S, Vaughan-Williams E. Changes in asthma prevalence: two surveys 15 years apart. Arch Dis Child. 1989;64:1452–1456
  3. Ronchetti R, Villa MP, Barreto M, Rota R, Pagani J, Martella S, et al. Is the increase in childhood asthma coming to an end? findings from three surveys of schoolchildren in Rome, Italy. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:881–886
  4. Simpson BM, Custovic A, Simpson A, Hallam CL, Walsh D, Marolia H, et al. NAC Manchester Asthma and Allergy Study (NACMAAS): risk factors for asthma and allergic disorders in adults. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31:391–399
  5. Wahn U, Lau S, Bergmann R, Kulig M, Forster J, Bergmann K, et al. Indoor allergen exposure is a risk factor for sensitisation during the first three years of life. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99:763–769
  6. Sporik R, Squillace SP, Ingram JM, Rakes G, Honsinger RW, Platts Mills TAE. Mite, cat and cockroach exposure, allergen sensitisation and asthma in children: a case-control study of three schools. Thorax. 1999;54:675–680
  7. Lau S, Illi S, Sommerfeld C, Niggemann B, Bergmann R, von Mutius E, et al. Early exposure to house dust mite and cat allergens and development of childhood asthma: a cohort study. Lancet. 2000;356:1392–1397
  8. Melen E, Wickman M, Nordvall SL, van Hage-Hamsten M, Lindfors A. Influence of early and current environmental exposure factors on sensitization and outcome of asthma in pre-school children. Allergy. 2001;56:646–652
  9. Remes ST, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Holberg CJ, Martinez FD, Wright AL. Dog exposure in infancy decreases the subsequent risk of frequent wheeze but not of atopy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:509–515
  10. Rhodes HL, Sporik R, Thomas P, Holgate ST, Cogswell JJ. Early life risk factors for adult asthma: a birth cohort study of subjects at risk. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:720–725
  11. Hesselmar B, Aberg N, Aberg B, Eriksson B, Bjorksten B. Does early exposure to cat or dog protect against later allergy development?. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:611–617
  12. Wilkinson WM. Development of allergy in the desert. J Trop Med Hyg. 1964;67:16–18
  13. Strannegard IL, Strannegard O. Childhood bronchial asthma in a desert country. Allergy. 1990;45:327–333
  14. Behbehani NA, Abal A, Syabbalo NC, Abd AA, Shareef E, Al Momen J. Prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema in 13- to 14-year-old children in Kuwait: an ISAAC study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000;85:58–63
  15. ISAAC Steering Committee . Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and atopic eczema. Lancet. 1998;351:1225–1232
  16. Epidemiology Standardisation Project II. Recommended respiratory disease questionnaires for use with adults and children in epidemiological research. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978;118(suppl):7–53
  17. Luczynska CM, Arruda LK, Platts-Mills TAE, Miller JD, Lopez M, Chapman MD. A two site monoclonal antibody ELISA for the quantification of the major Dermatophagoides spp. allergens, Der p I and Der f I. J Immunol Methods. 1989;118:227–235
  18. Chapman MD, Aalberse RC, Brown MJ, Platts-Mills TAE. Monoclonal antibodies to the major feline allergen Fel d I, II: single step affinity purification of Fel d I, N terminal sequence analysis and development of a sensitive two site immunoassay to assess Fel d I exposure. J Immunol. 1988;140:812–818
  19. Pollart SM, Smith TF, Morris EC, Platts-Mills TAE, Chapman MD. Environmental exposure to cockroach allergens: analysis using a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;87:505–510
  20. Custovic A, Green R, Fletcher A, Smith A, Pickering CAC, Chapman MD, et al. Aerodynamic properties of major dog allergen Can f 1: distribution in homes, concentration and particle size of allergen in the air. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:94–98
  21. Hijazi N, Ezeamuzie CI, Khan M, Dowaisan A. Characteristics of asthmatic children in Kuwait. J Asthma. 2002;39:603–609
  22. Ezeamuzie CI, Thomson MS, Al Ali S, Dowaisan A, Khan M, Hijazi Z. Asthma in the desert: spectrum of the sensitizing aeroallergens. Allergy. 2000;55:157–162
  23. Perzanowski MS, Ronmark E, Nold B, Lundback B, Platts-Mills TAE. Relevance of allergens from cats and dogs to asthma in the northernmost province of Sweden: schools as a major site of exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:1018–1024
  24. Warner JA, Little SA, Pollock I, Longbottom JL, Warner JO. The influence of exposure to house dust mite, cat, pollen and fungal allergens in the home on primary sensitisation in asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1991;1:76–86
  25. Sporik R, Ingram JM, Price W, Sussman JH, Honsinger RW, Platt-Mills TAE. Association of asthma with serum IgE and skin test reactivity to allergens among children living at high altitude: tickling the dragon's breath. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:1388–1392
  26. Nelson HS, Szefler SJ, Jacobs J, Huss K, Shapiro G, Sternberg AL. The relationships among environmental allergen sensitization, allergen exposure, pulmonary function and bronchial hyper-responsiveness in the Childhood Asthma Management Program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104:775–785
  27. Lindfors A, van Hage-Hamsten M, Rietz H, Wickman M, Nordvall SL. Influence of interaction of environmental risk factors and sensitisation in young asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104:755–762
  28. Eggleston PA, Rosenstreich DL, Lynn H, Gergen P, Baker D, Kattan M, et al. Relationship of indoor allergen exposure to skin test sensitivity in inner-city children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102:563–570
  29. Santos AB, Chapman MD, Aalberse RC, Vailes L, Ferriani VP, Oliver C, et al. Cockroach allergens and asthma in Brazil: identification of tropomyosin as a major allergen with potential cross-reactivity with mite and shrimp allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104:329–337
  30. Woodcock A, Addo-Yobo EOD, Taggart SCO, Craven M, Custovic A. Pet allergen levels in homes in Ghana and the U.K. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:463–465
  31. Custovic A, Hallam CL, Simpson BM, Craven M, Simpson A, Woodcock A. Decreased prevalence of sensitization to cats with high exposure to cat allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:537–539
  32. Custovic A, Simpson BM, Simpson A, Hallam CL, Marolia H, Walsh D, et al. Current mite, cat and dog allergen exposure, pet ownership and sensitization to inhalant allergens in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:402–407
  33. Perzanowski MS, Ronmark E, Platts-Mills TAE, Lundback B. Effect of cat and dog ownership on sensitization and development of asthma among preteenage children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:696–702
  34. Platts-Mills T, Vaughan J, Squillace S, Woodfolk J, Sporik R. Sensitisation, asthma, and a modified Th2 response in children exposed to cat allergen: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2001;357:752–756
  35. Al Mousawi M, Behbehani N, Arifhodzic N, Lovel H, Woodcock A, Custovic A. Community exposure to environmental allergens in Kuwait: the levels of allergens in public places. Allergy. 2001;12:1237–1238
  36. Svanes C, Heinrich J, Jarvis D, Chinn S, Omenaas E, Gulsvik A, et al. Pet-keeping in childhood and adult asthma and hay fever: European Community Respiratory Health Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112:289–300
  37. Sorensen H, Gravesen S, Lind P, Schwartz B, Ashoor AA, Maglad S. The occurrence of indoor allergens in Saudi Arabia. Ann Allergy. 1985;54:530–533
  38. Khadadah M, Onadeko BO, Ezeamuzie CI, Mustafa HT, Marouf R, Sugathan TN. The association of skin test reactivity, total serum IgE levels, and peripheral blood eosinophilia with asthma in Kuwait. J Asthma. 2000;37:481–488
  39. Ellul-Micallef R, al Ali S. The spectrum of bronchial asthma in Kuwait. Clin Allergy. 1984;14:509–517

 Supported by the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Science.

PII: S0091-6749(04)02396-6

doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.09.005

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 114, Issue 6 , Pages 1389-1394, December 2004

Article Tools