The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 114, Issue 5 , Pages 1138-1145 , November 2004

Perception of risk associated with asthma research procedures among adolescents, parents, and pediatricians

  • Robert D. Annett, PhD

      Affiliations

    • From the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Robert D. Annett, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, MSC-10-5590, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001.
  • ,
  • Janet L. Brody, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Research Institute, Eugene
  • ,
  • David G. Scherer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of New Mexico College of Education
  • ,
  • Elizabeth A. Perkett, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque

Received 26 May 2004 ,Revised 11 July 2004 ,Accepted 28 July 2004.

  • Image Result

    Study I: Mean risk ratings associated with asthma research procedures. Repeated-measures MANOVA: Adolescents: F (9, 27)=14.56, P < .001 Parents: F (9, 27)=53.69, P<.001 Pediatricians: F (9, 32)=52.88,

    Study I: Mean risk ratings associated with asthma research procedures. Repeated-measures MANOVA: Adolescents: F (9, 27)=14.56, P < .001 Parents: F (9, 27)=53.69, P<.001 Pediatricians: F (9, 32)=52.88, P < .001 P values for pairwise comparisons of risk of venipuncture with research procedures by group (adolescents, parents, and pediatricians). A, Adolescent: rating is significantly different from venipuncture (P < .005); B, Parent: rating is significantly different from venipuncture (P < .005); C, Pediatrician: rating is significantly different from venipuncture (P < .005).

  • Image Result
    Study II: Mean benefit ratings associated with asthma research procedures. P values for 1-way ANOVA for each benefit rating among groups (adolescents, parents, and pediatricians). A, P < .001. Multipl

    Study II: Mean benefit ratings associated with asthma research procedures. P values for 1-way ANOVA for each benefit rating among groups (adolescents, parents, and pediatricians). A, P < .001. Multiple comparisons for each asthma research procedure with the Tukey HSD test for post-hoc comparisons: B, Venipuncture: Parents>adolescents-pediatricians Parents>adolescents, P < .05 Parents>pediatricians, P < .001 C, Spirometry: Parents>adolescents-pediatricians Parents>adolescents, P < .001 Parents>pediatricians, P < .001 D, Exhaled nitric oxide (NO): Parents>adolescents-pediatricians Parents>adolescents, P < .01 Parents>pediatricians, P < .01 E, Placebo: Adolescents-parents>pediatricians Adolescents>pediatricians, P<.001 Parents>pediatricians, P < .01 F, Psychological tests: Parents>adolescents Parents>adolescents, P < .01 Parents=pediatricians and adolescents=pediatricians.

 Supported by the Department of Health and Human Services, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI-RO1-HL64677).

PII: S0091-6749(04)02219-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.058

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 114, Issue 5 , Pages 1138-1145 , November 2004