The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 112, Issue 4 , Pages 747-754, October 2003

Four-year incidence of allergic sensitization among schoolchildren in a community where allergy to cat and dog dominates sensitization:

Report from the obstructive lung disease in northern sweden study group

  • Eva Rönmark, PhD

      Affiliations

    • OLIN Study Group, Department of Medicine, Sunderby Central Hospital of Norrbotten, Luleå, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Lung and Allergy Research, National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Luleå, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, University of Umeå, Stockholm, Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Eva Rönmark, PhD, The OLIN study group, Luleå Health Care Centre, Repslagaregatan 4-6, SE-972 39 Luleå, Sweden
  • ,
  • Matthew Perzanowski, MPH

      Affiliations

    • OLIN Study Group, Department of Medicine, Sunderby Central Hospital of Norrbotten, Luleå, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, University of Umeå, Stockholm, Umeå, Sweden
    • Asthma and Allergy Diseases Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas Platts-Mills, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Asthma and Allergy Diseases Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va, USA
  • ,
  • Bo Lundbäck, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • OLIN Study Group, Department of Medicine, Sunderby Central Hospital of Norrbotten, Luleå, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Lung and Allergy Research, National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Luleå, Stockholm, Sweden

Received 20 December 2002; received in revised form 7 June 2003; accepted 10 June 2003.

Article Outline

Abstract 

Background

Exposure to high levels of cat allergen might prevent sensitization.

Objective

We sought to measure the incidence of allergic sensitization among schoolchildren living in a dust mite– and cockroach-free environment and the associated risk factors.

Methods

In 1996, a longitudinal cohort was established in northern Sweden, including 2454 children aged 7 to 8 years. Children were skin tested, and the testing was repeated 4 years later. Questionnaires were completed yearly. Participation was 88% both in 1996 and 2000.

Results

The prevalence of positive skin test results increased from 20.6% at age 7 and 8 years to 30.4% at age 11 and 12 years, a cumulative incidence of 13.8%, and was significantly higher among boys. The incidence was highest for cat (6.0%), timothy grass (5.9%), dog (4.9%), and birch (3.6%). A family history of allergy was the major risk factor for both a positive skin test response at age 7 and 8 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% CI, 1.36-2.10) and for development of a positive skin test response over the next 4 years (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.23-2.28). A significant inverse association between cat and dog ownership and the prevalence of type 1 allergy was found, particularly for those children who had lived with a cat both before age 7 and 8 years and during the next 4 years (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.61). A similar pattern, although not significant, was found for incident cases.

Conclusion

The high incidence of type 1 allergy at this age was similar to reports from communities with mite and cockroach allergen. Despite cat and dog being the most common allergens of sensitization, keeping these animals at home was not associated with an increased risk for sensitization.

Keywords:  Allergic sensitization, prevalence, incidence, risk factors, schoolchildren

Abbreviations:  OR, Odds ratio, RR, Relative risk, SPT, Skin prick test

 

Quantifying the hypothesized increase in the prevalence of type 1 allergy has been difficult because both the methods and the allergen extracts used for assessing immediate hypersensitivity have altered. Nevertheless, several studies point to a recent increase in the prevalence of allergy.1, 2

The prevalence of type 1 allergy increases with increasing age and becomes highest among young adults.3, 4 The preteenage years are thought to be an important time for the onset of allergy, and a report from Australia showed a 4-year cumulative incidence of a positive skin test response of 15% from age 8 to 12 years.5 However, studies have examined the incidence of allergic diseases mostly among young children.6

Much of the current literature concerning risk factors for allergic sensitization has been derived from cross-sectional studies, which are less informative than prospective studies. The strongest identified risk factor is a history of allergy in the family.7, 8 Urban living has been reported to be a risk factor,7, 9 even though a lower prevalence of positive skin test responses was found in a more polluted area.10 The number of older siblings11, 12 has been reported to be inversely related to having a positive skin test response. The hygiene hypothesis has been extended to include other lifestyle factors that have been associated with a decreased prevalence of allergy: living on a farm,13, 14 an anthroposophical lifestyle,15 and exposure to bacteria.16

Recent studies have suggested that living in a home with cats or dogs might protect against the development of type 1 allergy.6, 17, 18, 19, 20 Studies from the current cohort in Northern Sweden found an inverse association between pet ownership and type 1 allergy at age 7 and 8 years.7 Prospective follow-up over the next 3 years showed a decreased risk for incidence of asthma among cat owners.20

The cold, dry climate in the northernmost province of Sweden offers a unique allergen environment. Despite the lack of mite and cockroach allergen,21 the prevalence of asthma is similar to that in other areas in Europe and higher than that in southern Sweden.2, 17 In 1996, the prevalence of allergic sensitization was 21% in the cohort of 7- and 8-year-old children.7, 17 The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of type 1 sensitization over 4 years and to examine the risk factors for sensitization, including cat and dog ownership.

Back to Article Outline

Methods 

We used questionnaires and skin prick tests (SPTs). SPTs were performed at the beginning of the study and 4 years later. A questionnaire was completed yearly. Consent for SPTs was obtained from parents. The ethical committee at the University Hospital of Northern Sweden in Umeå approved the study.

Study population 

In 1996, all children enrolled in the first and second grades (n = 2454) in schools in the municipalities of Kiruna and Luleå, Sweden, were invited to participate (ages 7 and 8 years). Four years later, all children, now in the fifth and sixth grades, were invited. The participation rate was 88% in both 1996 (n = 2149) and 2000 (n = 2155) and did not differ by sex and area. Studies of incidence were performed among the 1870 children who were tested both times.

SPTs 

SPTs were carried out between February and April. The same nurse tested the children in Kiruna both times, whereas 2 nurses performed the tests in Luleå in 1996 and 2000, respectively. The nurses were trained together before the studies. SPTs were performed on the volar aspects of one forearm by using lancets. The allergens were birch, timothy grass, mugwort, dog, cat, horse, Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Cladosporium species, and Alternaria species (Soluprick; ALK, HØrsholm, Denmark). The potency of the extracts was 10 HEP, except for the 2 molds, which were 1:20 wt/vol. Histamine, 10 mg/mL, and glycerol were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. A positive reaction was recorded if the wheal was 3 mm or larger after 15 minutes.22

Serum collection 

The SPT results from the children at age 7 and 8 years have been validated previously.21 In 2000-2001, sera were collected from a total of 923 children, all of the children in Kiruna and a random sample in Luleå. Specific IgE antibodies to cat, dog, birch, and timothy grass were measured by using the CAP system (Pharmacia Upjohn) at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Questionnaire 

The parental questionnaire included questions for screening of possible risk factors and was completed yearly. In 1996, we asked about current or earlier cat or dog ownership. After 1996, data about keeping cats or dogs were collected annually.

Definitions 

A positive SPT response was defined as a wheal of 3 mm or larger to any of the tested allergens. Any positive SPT response was defined as a positive SPT response to at least one of the tested allergens. Incidence of sensitization was defined as a negative SPT response in 1996 but a positive SPT response in 2000. A respiratory infection was defined as a report of whooping cough, croup, pneumonia, or severe respiratory infection, including respiratory syncytial virus. Rural living was defined as living in the countryside or in villages with fewer than 500 inhabitants. A family history of allergy was defined as a report of allergy in the mother, father, or any sibling. Cat and dog ownership at different periods is shown in Fig 1

  • View full-size image.
  • FIG 1. 

    Prospective incidence study of positive skin test responses over 4 years beginning at age 7 to 8 years. Data on furred pets at home during the first 2 years of life were obtained by recall when the child was 7 to 8 years old. Ever cat in 1996: rural 41%, urban 35%; Luleå 39%, Kiruna 27%. Ever dog in 1996: rural 60%, urban 47%; Luleå 43%, Kiruna 62%.

Analysis 

The incidence of any positive SPT response was expressed as the proportion of children with no positive SPT responses in 1996 but any positive SPT responses in 2000. The incidence of sensitization to a specific allergen was evaluated separately for each allergen.

Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS and Epi-info. χ2 tests were used for bivariate comparisons. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for determinants of positive SPT responses. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed by using the independent variables that were significantly associated with positive SPT responses in the bivariate analyses. The effect of having a cat or dog was compared with results in those who never had a cat or dog at home. In the analysis of the effect of cat or dog ownership, the children who had answered the specific questions about having a cat or dog at home every year were included. Nonresponse to specific questions was 0% to 7%. The dependent variables were prevalent and incident cases of positive SPT responses.

Back to Article Outline

Results 

Prevalence and incidence 

The prevalence of a positive SPT response to any of the tested allergens was 20.6% at age 7 and 8 years and had increased to 30.4% by age 11 and 12 years. At both ages, the most common allergen was cat, followed by dog, birch, and timothy grass (Fig 2). The prevalence of any positive SPT response at age 11 and 12 years among the 1870 children who were tested twice was 30.8%.

  • View full-size image.
  • FIG 2. 

    Prevalence (percentage) of positive skin test responses in 1996 (age 7-8 years) and in 2000 (age 11-12 years): difference by sex and study year. Significant differences: P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001.

The cumulative incidence of any positive SPT response during the 4-year period was 13.8% among the 1478 children with a negative SPT response to all tested allergens in 1996. Examining the specific allergens, the incidence was highest for cat (6.0%) and timothy grass (5.9%), followed by dog (4.9%) and birch (3.6%; Table I).

TABLE I. Four-year cumulative incidence and number of positive SPT responses from age 7 and 8 to age 11 and 12 years
Incidence with the population at risk: children with no positive SPT responses at age 7-8 yIncidence with the population at risk: children with a negative SPT response to the specific allergen at age 7-8 y
AllergenBoys, % (n)Girls, % (n)All, % (n)Difference by sex, P valueBoys, % (n)Girls, % (n)All, % (n)Difference by sex, P value
Cat7.5 (55)4.6 (34)6.0 (89).01810.7 (86)7.0 (56)8.8 (142).009
Dog6.1 (45)3.6 (27)4.9 (72).05112.9 (111)8.6 (73)10.4 (184).011
Horse2.0 (15)1.3 (10)1.7 (25).2975.8 (51)5.0 (44)5.4 (95).471
Any animal9.8 (72)6.2 (46)8.0 (118).01012.5 (98)7.5 (58)10.0 (156).001
Birch3.8 (28)3.4 (25)3.6 (53).6388.2 (71)6.8 (58)7.5 (129).251
Timothy7.2 (53)4.6 (34)5.9 (87).03011.1 (96)8.4 (73)9.7 (169).056
Mugwort1.0 (7)0.7 (5)0.8 (12).5463.0 (28)2.4 (22)2.7 (50).441
Any pollen10.1 (74)7.1 (53)8.6 (127).04213.8 (112)10.1 (83)11.9 (195).021
Any allergen16.2 (119)11.4 (85)13.8 (204).00816.211.413.8.008

The incidence was calculated both with children who had negative SPT responses to all allergens tested at age 7 and 8 years as the population at risk and with the children who had negative SPT responses to the specific allergen as the population at risk.

The incidence of sensitization to specific allergens was higher when calculated independently of the child's status to other allergens at age 7 and 8 years and was highest for dog (10.4%), followed by timothy grass (9.7%), cat (8.8%), and birch (7.5%), whereas it was low for mite and mold (Table II).

TABLE II. Risk factors for prevalent cases of positive SPT responses at age 7 and 8 years, incident cases over the next 4 years of life, and prevalent cases at age 11 and 12 years
Any positive skin test response
Risk factorsChildren with risk (%)Prevalent cases at age 7-8 y, RR (95% CI)Prevalent cases at age 11-12 y, RR (95%)4-y incident cases, RR (95% CI)
Male sex50.01.17 (0.99-1.39)1.28 (1.12-1.46)1.42 (1.10-1.84)
Family history of allergy45.41.57 (1.33-1.86)1.61 (1.41-1.84)1.53 (1.18-1.97)
Birth order
No. 235.60.89 (0.73-1.08)0.92 (0.79-1.07)0.99 (0.73-1.34)
No. 3 or more26.10.86 (0.69-1.07)0.92 (0.78-1.10)1.01 (0.72-1.39)
Breast-fed <3 mo22.50.87 (0.70-1.07)0.94 (0.80-1.11)1.02 (0.75-1.39)
Mother smokes31.80.91 (0.76-1.08)0.92 (0.80-1.06)1.03 (0.79-1.34)
House dampness22.71.10 (0.91-1.33)1.11 (0.96-1.28)0.99 (0.72-1.35)
Rural living12.40.63 (0.46-0.86)0.86 (0.70-1.06)1.17 (0.83-1.64)
Residence in Kiruna (vs Luleå)28.71.02 (0.85-1.22)1.35 (1.18-1.55)1.97 (1.53-2.53)
Any pet ever at home69.40.80 (0.67-0.95)0.74 (0.65-0.85)0.89 (0.68-1.15)
Cat ever at home26.50.65 (0.52-0.80)0.61 (0.52-0.71)0.69 (0.50-0.95)
Dog ever at home33.80.74 (0.66-0.90)0.83 (0.73-0.95)0.94 (0.73-1.22)
Furred pets at home first 2 y of life34.40.81 (0.67-0.97)0.85 (0.73-0.98)1.02 (0.78-1.33)
Ever lived at a farm2.80.33 (0.13-0.85)0.52 (0.28-0.94)0.62 (0.24-1.59)

Validation of the skin tests 

The correlations between positive SPT responses and specific IgE levels were high. By using the serum assay as the true value (positive = >0.35 IU IgE/mL), the sensitivity and specificity of the SPTs for cat were 95.3% and 90.1%, respectively. The corresponding values for dog were 88.9% and 88.3%, values for birch were 84.8% and 96.4%, and values for timothy grass were 90.8% and 92.3%. The prevalence of increased IgE levels to cat, dog, birch, or timothy grass was 30.9% in Kiruna versus 24.6% in Luleå (P = .03).

Risk factors for prevalent and incident SPT response positivity 

The strongest risk factor for a positive SPT response to any allergen in all bivariate analyses was a family history of allergy (RR, 1.5-1.6). Male sex was a significant risk factor for the prevalent cases at age 11 and 12 years and the incident cases as well. Rural living decreased the risk significantly at age 7 and 8 years but not at age 11 and 12 years or the incident cases. Of the children tested, 2.8% had lived on a farm, and they were at significantly lower risk of having a positive SPT response to any allergen both at age 7 and 8 years (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.85) and 4 years later (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.94; Table II).

The variables of having a cat or dog ever at home and having furred pets at home during the first 2 years of life were both significantly associated with a decreased risk for prevalent cases of any positive SPT response both at age 7 and 8 years and age 11 and 12 years. Furthermore, ever having a cat at home was significantly associated with a decreased risk for incident cases (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95; Table II) and most pronounced among those children who persistently had a cat at home, both for prevalent cases at age 11 and 12 years (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.60) and for incident cases (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.94). The pattern was similar for persistently having had a dog at home (Table III).

TABLE III. Frequency of positive SPT responses in 1996 (age 7-8 years) and 2000 (age 11-12 years) and the incident cases between 1996 and 2000 in relationship to cat and dog ownership
Prevalent cases at age 7-8 y (n), RR (95% CI)Prevalent cases at age 11-12 y (n), RR (95% CI)4-y incident cases (n), RR (95% CI)
Any positive SPT responsePositive response to cat-dogAny positive SPT responsePositive response to cat-dogAny positive SPT responsePositive response to cat-dog
Never cat22.8% (357), reference15.1% (237), reference35.4% (454), reference23.7% (303), reference15.7% (141), reference9.8% (98), reference
Cat earlier18.4% (61), 0.81 (0.63-1.03)11.5% (38), 0.76 (0.55-1.05)26.2% (50), 0.74 (0.55-0.95)17.8% (34), 0.75 (0.55-1.04)11.2% (16), 0.71 (0.44-1.16)6.5% (10), 0.66 (0.35-1.24)
Cat later23.3% (35), 0.66 (0.49-0.89)15.3% (23), 0.65 (0.44-0.96)12.2% (14), 0.78 (0.46-1.30)9.9% (12), 1.01 (0.57-1.78)
Cat persistent-current in 19969.4% (22), 0.41 (0.27-0.62)5.1% (12), 0.34 (0.19-0.60)16.4% (50), 0.46 (0.36-0.60)8.9% (27), 0.38 (0.26-0.55)9.9% (25), 0.63 (0.42-0.94)6.4% (17), 0.65 (0.40-1.07)
Never dog22.6% (319), reference9.3% (131), reference33.1% (345), reference19.8% (206), reference14.3% (105), reference12.5% (108), reference
Dog earlier21.5% (78), 0.95 (0.77-1.19)11.1% (40), 1.19 (0.85-1.66)35.0% (64), 1.06 (0.85-1.31)21.9% (40), 1.11 (0.82-1.49)13.1% (16), 0.92 (0.56-1.50)10.6% (15), 0.85 (0.51-1.41)
Dog later26.2% (64), 0.79 (0.63-0.99)13.9% (34), 0.70 (0.50-0.99)11.2% (21), 0.79 (0.51-1.22)9.4% (20), 0.76 (0.48-1.19)
Dog persistent-current in 199611.9% (43), 0.53 (0.39-0.71)3.9% (14), 0.42 (0.24-0.72)25.2% (121), 0.76 (0.64-0.91)12.1% (58), 0.61 (0.47-0.80)15.1% (58), 1.05 (0.78-1.42)8.6% (36), 0.69 (0.48-0.98)

Positive STP response to cat in relation to cat exposure and positive STP to dog in relation to dog exposure.

Having cat, respectively dog, currently at home at the start of the study in 1996, when the children were 7-8 years old.

Having furred pets at home during the child's first 2 years of life was more prevalent among those without a history of allergy in the family compared with those with a family history of allergy (62.4% vs 37.6%, P < .001). The prevalence of any positive SPT response in 1996 among the children with a family history of allergy was 20.3% among those who had furred pets during the first 2 years of life, whereas it was 28.2% among those who did not have a pet (P = .011). Among the children without a history of allergy in the family, the corresponding prevalence was 17% both among the children who had a furred pet at home in the first 2 years of life and those who did not.

Multivariate analysis 

The pattern remained similar in the multiple logistic regression analyses, and the highest risks for any positive SPT response at age 11 and 12 years were a family history of allergic disease (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.54-2.30), male sex (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.23-1.84), and living in Kiruna versus Luleå (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.21-1.88). Living in a rural area significantly decreased the risk for sensitization to cat (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.87) and to dog (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). When the variable of ever having lived on a farm was used in the analyses instead of the variables about cat or dog ownership, a significantly decreased risk for any positive SPT response was found (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.92). However, it did not reach significance if cat or dog ownership was included in the model.

The inverse associations between living in a house with a cat or dog and sensitization remained significant in the multivariate analyses. A decreased risk for any positive SPT response at age 11 and 12 years was found among all 3 pet ownership temporal groups and was most pronounced among the children who persistently had lived in a house with a cat. The effect of dog ownership showed a similar but less distinct pattern (Table IV). Separate analyses among boys and girls showed persistent exposure to cat to be significantly associated with a decreased risk of sensitization both among boys (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.19-0.51) and girls (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94).

TABLE IV. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) of the association between pet ownership at different times in a child's life and positive SPT responses to any allergen at age 7 to 8 and 11 to 12 years, cat or dog at age 11 to 12 years, and incident cases of any allergen in the 4 years before age 11 to 12 years
Dependent variable
Independent variablesAny positive SPT response at age 7-8 y, OR (95% CI)Any positive SPT response at age 11- 12 y, OR (95% CI)Cat-dog positive SPT response at age 11-12 y, OR (95% CI)4-y incidence of any positive SPT response, OR (95% CI)
Cat earlier0.83 (0.61-1.13)0.70 (0.50-0.99)0.77 (0.51-1.14)0.73 (0.42-1.27)
Cat later0.62 (0.41-0.92)0.65 (0.41-1.04)0.88 (0.48-1.61)
Cat persistent-current in 19960.41 (0.26-0.65)0.44 (0.31-0.61)0.39 (0.26-0.60)0.72 (0.45-1.14)
Dog earlier0.99 (0.75-1.32)1.15 (0.82-1.62)0.70 (0.46-1.08)0.94 (0.53-1.66)
Dog later0.72 (0.52-0.99)0.58 (0.35-0.97)0.74 (0.44-1.23)
Dog persistent-current in 19960.50 (0.35-0.71)0.66 (0.51-0.85)0.37 (0.23-0.59)0.91 (0.63-1.31)

Other variables included in the models were sex, family history of allergy, rural living, and area of domicile.

Positive STP response to cat in relation to cat exposure and positive STP to dog in relation to dog exposure.

Having cat, respectively dog, currently at home at the start of the study in 1996, when the children were 7-8 years old.

Significant risk factors for incident cases of any positive SPT response were a family history of allergy (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.23-2.28), male sex (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.24-2.31), and living in Kiruna (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.58-2.99). Cat or dog ownership at any time period indicated a decreased risk for sensitization; however, these associations were not significant (Table IV).

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

The incidence of sensitization to inhalant allergens over 4 years was high (13.8%) and resulted in an increase in prevalence from 20.6% at age 7 and 8 years to 30.4% 4 years later. The high incidence combined with the prospective nature of the study design and the size of the cohort allowed for an in-depth analysis of the risk factors for the onset of sensitization. The high participation rate, standardized methods, and close correlation between SPT results and in vitro IgE assays at age 7 and 8 years21 and at age 11 and 12 years support the validity of the results.

The results are in keeping with 2 previous cross-sectional studies conducted in northern Sweden, one2 in which 27% of 7- to 9-year-old children and another8 in which 43% of 14-year-old children were allergic. In a prospective study of similar age groups conducted in Australia, where dust mites are common, the 4-year cumulative incidence of positive SPT responses was 15%.5 In the absence of both dust mites and cockroaches, development of allergic sensitization in the preteenage years was surprisingly similar in northern Sweden to that found in a mite-endemic environment.

The risk factors for incident cases of positive SPT responses were similar to those of subjects who already had immediate hypersensitivity by age 7 and 8 years.7 The strongest risk factor was a family history of allergy. Although no sex difference in the prevalence of allergy was found at age 7 and 8 years, the incidence of allergic sensitization was higher among boys. This sex difference had been previously observed.2, 4 The higher prevalence of allergy in Kiruna compared with that in the rest of Sweden has also been reported previously.2 In contrast to previous reports,11, 12 no association between the number of siblings or birth order was found for allergic sensitization in this population.

The absence of a cat at home does not mean that a child is not exposed to cat allergens. Cat allergen is transferred on clothing to schools and public buildings, and significant levels of cat and dog allergens have been measured in the schools that these children attend, although the levels of cat allergen in homes with a cat are approximately 100 times higher.21, 23, 24, 25 The relationship between allergy and high exposure of allergens is not consistent. High exposure to pollen might increase the risk for allergy,26 although our study did not find any association between sensitization and having been born during the pollen season.

Recently, several studies have shown a protective effect of having a cat or dog at home on development of sensitization and asthma.6, 17, 18, 19, 27 In our cohort, cat ownership was not only associated with a lower prevalence of sensitization but was also associated with a lower prevalence of asthma, as well as a lower incidence of asthma during the same lifetime period examined in this study.7, 20 Secondary prevention (ie, cats being removed when children become allergic) has been suggested as the cause of the pet protective effect.28 However, this type of selection bias has been corrected for in our studies by using the pet ownership variable of ever having had a cat in the home, thereby including any children who became allergic with a cat in the cat ownership group.7, 20 Primary prevention has also been suggested, and children of allergic parents are less likely to live in a house with a cat in this community. However, when the data are stratified into those children who have a family history of allergy or asthma, the protective effect against sensitization and asthma is more pronounced among those children with a hereditary risk for allergic disease.20 In addition, an inverse association between pet ownership and allergy has been observed in communities in which there is equal pet ownership between children with and without an allergic parent.6

Several steps were taken in our study to avoid the potential bias of pet ownership selection. First, the results have been corrected for a history of allergy in the family. Furthermore, in the longitudinal study cat and dog ownership were known before sensitization had occurred. Those children who owned a cat had a lower incidence of allergic sensitization. The relationship was not significant for new cat owners (cat later) or children who had only been exposed earlier in life (cat earlier), although the trend was still toward a negative association. In addition, exposure to furred pets at home during the first 2 years of life was associated with a decreased risk of sensitization, particularly among those with a history of allergy in the family. Therefore we have not identified any period in preteenage life when exposure to a cat in the home was associated with increased allergy. In fact, persistent exposure to high levels of cat allergen appears to be protective against the development of sensitization among both boys and girls.

As seen with other studies, the children at age 7 and 8 years were less likely to be allergic if they were living in a rural area7, 9 or living on a farm.13, 14 Interestingly, however, there was no protective effect of rural living seen for the incident cases. A similar protective effect in early life, but not later, has been reported.29 Understanding the protective effect seen with rural living is difficult because it could encompass several factors, such as lifestyle, diet, housing, bacterial exposure, and animal exposure. There is some evidence for a role of increased bacterial exposure in reductions in the risk of allergy.16, 30, 31 However, our preliminary results do not indicate higher levels of airborne endotoxin in homes with animals. A modified immune response has been proposed, whereby exposure to high quantities of cat allergen causes a specific switch from IgE to IgG production.19

In conclusion, the incidence of allergic sensitization between ages 7 to 8 and 11 to 12 years was high in this community, despite a lack of dust mites or cockroaches. The major risk factor for incident and prevalent cases of positive skin test response was a history of allergy in the family. Even though cat was the most common allergen of sensitization, keeping a cat or dog at home was not related to an increased risk for development of sensitization to allergens from these animals. Thus, in contrast to traditional thinking, avoiding cats and dogs at home does not protect against sensitization.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

We thank Kerstin Kemi-Björnström, Lena Gustafsson, and Aina Johnsson for collection of the data. ALK and Pharmacia-Upjohn are acknowledged for help with providing test material and GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca for additional support.

Back to Article Outline

References 

    References
  1. Sibbald B, Rink E, D'Souza M. Is the prevalence of atopy increasing?. Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40:338–340
  2. Åberg N, Hesselmar B, Åberg B, Eriksson B. Increase of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema in Swedish schoolchildren between 1979 and 1991. Clin Exp Allergy. 1995;25:815–819
  3. Baldacci S, Modena P, Carrozzi L, Pedreschi M, Vellutini M, Biavati P, et al.  Skin prick test reactivity to common aeroallergens in relation to total IgE, respiratory symptoms, and smoking in a general population sample of northern Italy. Allergy. 1996;51:149–156
  4. Plaschke P, Janson C, Norrman E, Björnsson E, Lundbäck B, Lindholm N, et al.  Skin prick tests and specific IgE in adults from three different areas of Sweden. Allergy. 1996;51:461–472
  5. Peat JK, Salome CM, Woolcock AJ. Longitudinal changes in atopy during a 4-year period: relation to bronchial hyperresponsiveness and respiratory symptoms in a population sample of Australian schoolchildren. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990;85:65–74
  6. Ownby D, Johnson CC, Peterson EL. Exposure to dogs and cats in the first year of life and risk of allergic sensitization at 6 and 7 years of age. JAMA. 2002;288:963–972
  7. Rönmark E, Lundbäck B, Jönsson E, Platts-Mills T. Asthma, type-1 allergy and related conditions in 7- and 8-year-old children in northern Sweden: prevalence rates and risk factor pattern. Respir Med. 1998;92:316–324
  8. Norrman E, Rosenhall L, Nyström L, Jaönsson E, Stjernberg N. Prevalence of positive skin prick tests, allergic asthma, and rhinoconjunctivitis in teenagers in northern Sweden. Allergy. 1994;49:808–815
  9. Turner KJ, Dowse GK, Stewart GA, Alpers MP. Studies on bronchial hyperreactivity, allergic responsiveness, and asthma in rural and urban children of the highlands of Papua New Guinea. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;77:558–566
  10. von Mutius E, Martinez FD, Fritzsch C, Nicolai T, Roell G, Thiemann HH. Prevalence of asthma and atopy in two areas of West and East Germany. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:358–364
  11. Strachan DP. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ. 1989;299:1259–1260
  12. von Mutius E, Martinez FD, Fritzsch C, Nicolai T, Reitmeir P, Thiemann HH. Skin test reactivity and number of siblings. BMJ. 1994;308:692–695
  13. Downs SH, Marks GB, Mitakakis TZ, Leuppi JD, Car NG, Peat JK. Having lived on a farm and protection against allergic diseases in Australia. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31:570–575
  14. Riedler J, Braun-Fahrlander C, Eder W, Schreuer M, Waser M, Maisch S, et al.  Exposure to farming in early life and development of asthma and allergy: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001;358:1129–1133
  15. Alm JS, Swartz J, Lilja G, Scheynius A, Pershagen G. Atopy in children of families with an anthroposophic lifestyle. Lancet. 1999;353:1485–1488
  16. Braun-Fahrlander C, Riedler J, Herz U, Eder W, Waser M, Grize L, et al.  Environmental exposure to endotoxin and its relation to asthma in school-age children. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:869–877
  17. Rönmark E, Jönsson E, Platts-Mills T, Lundbäck B. Different pattern of risk factors for atopic and nonatopic asthma among childrenreport from the Obstructive Lung Disease in Northern Sweden Study. Allergy. 1999;54:926–935
  18. Hesselmar B, Åberg N, Åberg B, Eriksson B, Björksten B. Does early exposure to cat or dog protect against later allergy development?. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:611–617
  19. Platts-Mills T, Vaughan J, Squillace S, Woodfolk J, Sporik R. Sensitisation, asthma, and a modified Th2 response in children exposed to cat allergen: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2001;357:752–756
  20. Perzanowski MS, Rönmark E, Platts-Mills TA, Lundbäck B. Effect of cat and dog ownership on sensitization and development of asthma among preteenage children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:696–702
  21. Perzanowski MS, Rönmark E, Nold B, Lundbäck B, Platts-Mills TA. Relevance of allergens from cats and dogs to asthma in the northernmost province of Sweden: schools as a major site of exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:1018–1024
  22. Sub-Committee on Skin Tests of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology . Skin tests used in type I allergy testing position paper. Allergy. 1989;44(suppl 10):1–59
  23. Custovic A, Green R, Taggart SC, Smith A, Pickering CA, Chapman MD, et al.  Domestic allergens in public places. II: Dog (Can f1) and cockroach (Bla g 2) allergens in dust and mite, cat, dog and cockroach allergens in the air in public buildings. Clin Exp Allergy. 1996;26:1246–1252
  24. Patchett K, Lewis S, Crane J, Fitzharris P. Cat allergen (Fel d 1) levels on school children's clothing and in primary school classrooms in Wellington, New Zealand. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100:755–759
  25. Almqvist C, Larsson PH, Egmar AC, Hedren M, Malmberg P, Wickman M. School as a risk environment for children allergic to cats and a site for transfer of cat allergen to homes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:1012–1017
  26. Kihlstrom A, Lilja G, Pershagen G, Hedlin G. Exposure to birch pollen in infancy and development of atopic disease in childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:78–84
  27. Celedon JC, Litonjua AA, Ryan L, Platts-Mills T, Weiss ST, Gold DR. Exposure to cat allergen, maternal history of asthma, and wheezing in the first 5 years of life. Lancet. 2002;360:781–782
  28. Anyo G, Brunekreef B, de Meer G, Aarts F, Janssen NA, van Vliet P. Early, current and past pet ownership: associations with sensitization, bronchial responsiveness and allergic symptoms in school children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32:361–366
  29. Nilsson L, Castor O, Löfman O, Magnusson A, Kjellman NI. Allergic disease in teenagers in relation to urban or rural residence at various stages of childhood. Allergy. 1999;54:716–721
  30. von Mutius E, Braun-Fahrlander C, Schierl R, Riedler J, Ehlermann S, Maisch S, et al.  Exposure to endotoxin or other bacterial components might protect against the development of atopy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:1230–1234
  31. Lauener RP, Birchler T, Adamski J, Braun-Fahrlander C, Bufe A, Herz U, et al.  Expression of CD14 and Toll-like receptor 2 in farmers' and non-farmers' children. Lancet. 2002;360:465–466

 Supported by the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Foundation for Health Care Science and Allergy Research (Vårdal), the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-20565 and AI-34607), the Swedish Asthma-Allergy Foundation, and Norrbotten's local health authorities.

PII: S0091-6749(03)01866-9

doi:10.1016/S0091-6749(03)01866-9

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume 112, Issue 4 , Pages 747-754, October 2003